Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Court Enforcement Services Avoidance Notice Received - Help Please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2851 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone - hopefully the good people of this forum can help.

 

Between december 2013 and november 2015 i lived in a 3 bedroom small property with oil central heating.

 

The electric meter for this property is not situated at the property, but some mile away in a field, via another field.

 

When we moved in we werent able to take a meter reading, and subsequently couldnt for the 2 years we were there.

 

Swalec managed an actual reading at the end of 2015 having not done one for many many years,

and came up with a figure of £2900+ for the 2 years useage!

 

I tried arguing this with them, but subsequently had a ccj issued, which was then transfered to the high court.

I was not at the property as I have moved,

and may have missed some of the correspondance.

 

I fully admit that we do owe money for electric, however £3k for 2 years in a small property... impossible!

 

It is now at the stage where at my new property ive received a visit from someone

- i was out so i dont know if a bailiff or court officer (is there a difference)

 

Is the writ that was issued at my previous address still valid for my new address?

 

How can i go about getting this set aside in order for me to put my case in front of a court.

I feel that swalecs negligence is partially to blame in all of this.

 

Hoping someone can help,

I have a pregnant fiance who has lost our last 2

and a lovely little 5yo who could really do without this stress.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

writ with the wrong address I don't think is valid..

however lets deal with the underling problem.

 

 

back to the electric please..

 

 

you say you were there for 2yrs..

did you in that 2yrs get any bills from SW?

 

 

if they did not bill you for 'a' year

they cant back date more than 12mts

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

All the forms you require (set a side and to stay the Warrant) in the following link.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?454644-What-Form-What-For-Where-does-it-go

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have spoken to the officer today who has said unless I pay the full amount this morning he will return, force entry and remove goods while I'm in work.

 

Can a n244 be rushed through?

Any help here hugely appreciated

 

Oh yeah and 1k added for yesterday's visit, was told another would be added today!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can't force entry for a private debt to private premises.

 

start recording any future conversations.

 

You can make an urgent stay application to your nearest County Court. Phone them and see how you can do this. Make sure they know it relates to high court enforcement.

 

And they can't keep adding extra fees which are not written into the law that exists.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thabks for the response.

I'm waiting for my local court to open at 9am at which point I will see about getting an emergency appointment.

 

I'm not too worried about them visiting when I'm at home, I have little to no good of value, and my car is a company vehicle. However there are goods at the address of value which do not belong to me, and if I'm not there to prove that then I do worry they could attempt to seize them

 

To add £2500 to a £2900 debt for 2 visits seems like utter madness

 

Thanks again to the good people on here who help take the stress out of normal peoples lives

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

To add £2500 to a £2900 debt for 2 visits seems like utter madness

 

Thanks again to the good people on here who help take the stress out of normal peoples lives

 

In post number 4 you mentioned that £1,000 in fees has been applied but in your above post number 6 you have said that the fees are £2,500. Do you have a correct breakdown of the fees charged.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for confusion.

The debt was 2900

Yesterday the notice said I owed 4k

Today I was told another visit will add over a grand again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for confusion.

The debt was 2900

Yesterday the notice said I owed 4k

Today I was told another visit will add over a grand again

 

It may assist you to read the response that I gave to another poster with a similar enquiry to yours on another thread:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?465542-Bailiff-help-required&p=4910479&viewfull=1#post4910479

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are doing themselves no favours behaving as they are. I hope you manage to get enforcement activity stayed, and a chance to renegotiate the CCJ.

 

You say little about the issuing of the original CCJ - was the procedure followed correctly? I know I once had one awarded, later resolved, about which I knew absolutely nothing until the judgment landed on my doormat, thus demonstrating there was no confusion over addresses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone

 

Ive been advised to complete an N244 and email to the court tonight, and then pay the £155 fee tomorrow.

 

The court advised me this would stop enforcement action until the judge has seen the n244 which would be next week.

Does anyone know if this is true?

 

Also - is anyone on here in a position to advise on how I should be filling the form out, what I should say etc....

 

Lastly - does anyone know if a swalec debt would fall under the consumer credit act?

Just wondering as obviously if it does then it should never have gone to a high court

 

Thanks Everyone

Link to post
Share on other sites

consumer debt under the CCA with a CCJ CANNOT be enforced by HCEO

 

however

in this case ... gas/elec bills are not credit so are not CCA regulated

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have been advised wrong.

 

Until such time as a Judge makes a ruling the Writ is live and enforceable

- after ll there is no guarantee a Stay will be granted.

 

The only sure fire way is to personally take it and ask for an urgent application.

This debt does not fall under the CCA.

 

Have to be honest & say I think a Stay will fail anyway as you admit you do owe some monies

and have not helped yourself in how this has come about.

 

I appreciate it may not be what you want to hear but think it fair I put my cards down.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

consumer debt under the CCA with a CCJ CANNOT be enforced by HCEO

 

however

in this case ... gas/elec bills are not credit so are not CCA regulated.

 

What do you mean I do not have HCEO's after me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have been advised wrong.

 

Until such time as a Judge makes a ruling the Writ is live and enforceable

- after all there is no guarantee a Stay will be granted.

 

The only sure fire way is to personally take it and ask for an urgent application.

This debt does not fall under the CCA.

 

Have to be honest & say I think a Stay will fail anyway as you admit you do owe some monies

and have not helped yourself in how this has come about.

 

I appreciate it may not be what you want to hear but think it fair I put my cards down.

 

I fully appreciate what you're saying, and im not disputing that I owe money,

but im disputing the fact that I owe whats being requested.

 

 

My argument is that Swalec have not provided me with any proof that I have used this electric they are asking for,

and while I was disputing this with them and asking for advice they registered the CCJ.

 

 

We then moevd properties and the next thing I know I have a letter regarding a high court writ..

 

If a stay is not granted, what can I actually do?

I dont have 4k to pay them.

I cannot get 4k to pay them.

I have no goods of any value.

 

What is the end result of this situation where I have nothing to give them, and nothing they can take?

I tried agreeing a payment plan but they said no

Link to post
Share on other sites

This applies to the vast majority of judgments, the exception being where it is a judgment arising from a regulated agreement under the Consumer Credit Act. Currently, these may not be transferred to the High Court for enforcement by an HCEO. - thesherrifsoffice.com

 

Information:

 

consumer-credit regulated debts

 

Your creditor cannot enforce your judgment in the High Court if the debt is covered by the Consumer Credit Act 1974. - nationaldebtline

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not defending anyone here but the Utility Company will have written a raft of letters over this - did you try and negotiate with them? When they obtained the CCJ did you attend the Hearing or contest the sum they were asking for? Have you made any contact with them since the CCJ was awarded?

 

As for making payment to the HCEO then if he cannot gain access to your home or otherwise take control of goods outside then he is powerless. He will not waste too much time if he realises he is getting nowhere. He cannot gt blood from a stone and as I have said on a previous thread I would ignore him.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

right sorry that's sorted

what I was saying was regarding this:

 

Just wondering as obviously if it does then it should never have gone to a high court

 

your debt has not gone to high court but it could!

 

 

also what is

Court Enforcement Services Avoidance Notice ?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

right sorry that's sorted

what I was saying was regarding this:

 

Just wondering as obviously if it does then it should never have gone to a high court

 

your debt has not gone to high court but it could!

 

How do you know my debt has not gone to the high court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not defending anyone here but the Utility Company will have written a raft of letters over this - did you try and negotiate with them? When they obtained the CCJ did you attend the Hearing or contest the sum they were asking for? Have you made any contact with them since the CCJ was awarded?

 

As for making payment to the HCEO then if he cannot gain access to your home or otherwise take control of goods outside then he is powerless. He will not waste too much time if he realises he is getting nowhere. He cannot gt blood from a stone and as I have said on a previous thread I would ignore him.

 

I appreciate an honest approach much more than I would a cotton wool approach :)

 

Yes - there were letters being sent to us, which I dealt with via phone.

I argued for over a year that the electric meter could not be accessed.

It was a mile away in a field, surrounded by barbed wire and cattle and I didnt know where to look.

I had visits from at least 5 swalec meter readers who complained that they couldnt find or couldnt access the meter

- how was I meant to monitor my useage to see if swalecs costs were right?

 

Swalec said that on my appliances and house size that my average useage should be in the region of £43 a month,

however their actual reading put this amount at over £170 a month.

That just isnt reasonable.

 

During my arguements with Swalec over this it was sent to a ccj.

I cannot ever remember getting this CCJ,

i did not attend court,

and the first I really knew was a letter from HCEOs to my new property.

 

Potentially I missed a hold host of legal letters when i moved home.

 

Does that make sense?

 

Do you think I would be better off not applying for an n244?

And do you have experience with filling in N244s?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

right sorry that's sorted

 

also what is

Court Enforcement Services Avoidance Notice ?

 

And the Avoidance Notice is what was in my letterbox yesterday?

It says nothing else, just the baillifs number and a new figure of £4100 - it doesnt say why the figure has gone up or how.

It doesnt give me a baillifs name or anything, just a signature.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would you have to pay for an application or if on certain benefits or low wage you may be able to claim remission. The application cost is £255.

No im on a decent wage, and wouldnt qualify for the benefit.

I offered to pay a few grand today, but it was 4k or nothing!

The court told me today the figure was £155?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No im on a decent wage, and wouldnt qualify for the benefit.

I offered to pay a few grand today, but it was 4k or nothing!

The court told me today the figure was £155?

 

£155 is the old figure it increased to £255 in April.

 

If you have made a decent offer then they should have consulted with their client to see if it was acceptable. It sounds as if they have been watching too much telly.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

jcdg, there is no such prescribed form or notice as an 'Avoidance Letter'. If you could post a copy on here (deleting your details) then we could advise you further. It could be reported to the MoJ.

 

For your info, Court Enforcement Services is run by the old Marston Group hierarchy and they use the authority of Simon Williamson HCEO to enforce their judgments. Williamson is known for offering his name to many different firms (including the notorious DCBL) and at one point had around 15. That may go some way to explain the tactics being used here and the fees being charged.

 

You should demand details of the fees charged and the reasons they have been charged as at first glance it would appear they have not followed the stages as set out by the Taking Control of Goods (Fees) Regulations 2014.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...