Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Dear Sir/Madam, TFL case number: **** I would like to thank TFL for providing me the opportunity to explain my behaviour. I realised the stupidity of what I have done and wish to seek a resolution to this matter. I have no valid excuse for this action and I am extremely sorry and deeply regret my action. I hope you will accept my sincere apologies. Nothing can justify my action. I am aware that TFL are only able to operate if everyone pays their fare correctly and I feel so guilty about attempting to breach public trust. This has caused me sleepness nights and raised my anxieties. I have history of anxiety. This has been a hard lesson learnt. I have never been in trouble with the law in the past and I ensure that I won’t be in the future. I am and will be using my oyster card (PAYG). I would like to humbly appeal to TFL to allow me to settle this matter out of court and avoid going to prosecution given the adverse consequences it can have on me and my family. I am very concerned that prosecution for the first time and I would like to make restitution for my action. Having a criminal offense on my record will have detrimental consequences on me. I have always been a law abiding person and have no previous offences. I would really appreciate if I can be given the opportunity to pay for any unpaid fares plus any charges and/or administrative cost which have been incurred by TFL due to this incident. I am sincerely remorseful and ashamed of myself, and I fully appreciate the severity and stupidity of my transgressions. Again, I would like to offer my sincerest apologies. Yours Faithfully, My Name
    • the date is 19/04/24, so i have until 29/4/24 to reply? Yes, i will send my draft of my begging letter   
    • use the webform if it allows you to attach your evidential documents then do so but do that later depending upon who your bank is.... - but i suspect you will be referred to Mastercard. who is your bank? dx    
    • If i did it through the bank, they seem to have an online form. I wondered if this is the best way or to do a letter, add supporting documents and send them through the post, recorded delivery  ?
    • the process for attaining a charging order is the same no matter what it results in. interim first then latter they can go for a full charging order. at ICO stage its recorded the same on your deeds until a full CO is applied for and granted. however, as in your case, it resulted in simply a restriction k which cannot be converted into a full charging order so the entry remains stating ICO. smart cookies on your side IMHO now ...hope you succeed. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Benefit Fraud - Under Investigation


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2870 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

I am a new member and so pleased to have found this site, to be able to ask my questions.

 

I will try and keep it brief,

 

 

my h received a letter inviting him to attend an interview under caution,

this has not taken place yet, but it is imminent.

 

 

He does have a medical condition and has proof of it,

he was claiming ESA and the lower rate of PIP,

this is only a relative new claim,

 

 

always told them that I was working full time, no council tax benefit or housing benefit claimed for.

 

 

He was on the benefit for 5 months,

he started to feel a little better and wanted to go back to work,

luckily he did find a job,

tried to phone the benefit agency many times before starting this work to inform them of a change in circumstances,

could never get through,

so he decided to put it in writing to them,

then started work.

 

The job lasted four months,

had to give it up because the medical condition reared it's ugly head again,

but during the time he worked, the benefit kept getting paid,

he had given all his correct details to his employer and had paid tax and NI.

 

 

After a few months, he decided yet again to try and get back to work, this time the job lasted 7 weeks,

during which his employer had said that he had to register as self employed, did this all correctly.

 

 

Now he is not working and has to go and have the interview, we have got all copies the paperwork, thankfully.

 

He has got a solicitor to go with him,

but I am afraid that they are going to try and make out that it is his fault,

if he was trying to do anything deceitful,

then why would he give his employers the Nat Ins number,

 

 

he is not thick, he knows that this would show up and he hoped that at the end of the tax year,

they would realise their mistake and stop the payments,

by the way the money has not been spent, but saved.

 

 

We have always worked all of our lives and paid taxes etc,

never been in trouble before,

 

 

oh I do not know the amount of overpayment they are saying yet,

but it is their fault in our eye's that it even happened,

but I am scared of the DWP,

having heard awful stories about them.

 

Any advice would be much appreciated, thank you.

Edited by pottyprincess
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi PP,

 

Welcome to CAG!

 

 

Did you keep a copy of the letter that was sent to the DWP regarding change of circumstances, I.E new job & wanting to end the claim?

 

If yes, make sure you keep it safe & give it to your solicitor & keep a copy for yourselves.

 

Otherwise just be honest & state what you have here about what happened.

 

Hopefully this will be sorted out quite easily.

 

Good luck!

I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every single minute of it!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and thank you so much for your replies, luckily I did keep a copy of the letter, I also have kept copies of everything to do with the claim in the first place.

 

I am worrying myself sick over this because I have been reading horror stories, I am thinking that they will try and make out that it is my h's fault in some way, it has been going on a long time, a year in total I think, but you can never get through on the phone, holding on for over an hour then still nothing or get cut off, very frustrating!!!

 

I will come back and let you know how the interview went after it has taken place, towards the end of the week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again PP,

That's good to hear that you've kept copies of all the letters, do make a few copies so your Solicitor & the DWP can have them as needed.

 

I know you are worried & being under investigation is very daunting indeed, but please do not fill your head up with the horror stories.

 

Everyone has their own experiences, some good, some bad & others an entire different level, that doesn't mean your case is going to be like them horror stories.

 

I can imagine how frustrating it all is, esp living with it for a year. Your nearly at the end off it now, just make sure all your paperwork is prepared & in order for your interview & do speak to the Solicitor, he is there to help you both.

 

Hopefully this will soon be over.

 

Good luck!!

I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every single minute of it!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again,

 

 

Thank you for replying rainbow tears, I have been trying not to worry, I mean when you have not done anything wrong there is nothing to worry about, but, my h does not do well at any interview, even interviews for jobs, he is like a scared rabbit, so I do not know how he is going to be when questioned, from what I understand they make you feel guilty even when you are not, trying to get you to admit to wrong doing on the tape. What questions will they ask him? and how long will the interview last? can he read out a statement in his own words before the questioning starts, in the hope that it covers all the questions, or most of them.

 

 

I cannot wait for it to be over, again I understand that he will not find out at the interview about what is going to happen, but maybe have to wait weeks or even months.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did his ESA stop after he sent the letter?

 

If he's being interviewed under caution then they are looking at it as a "criminal" investigation. I'm not saying that he will go to court but it's not as simple as just paying the money back and it will go away.

 

Can I ask how many hours he was working and what his weekly pay was?

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Shoelover,

 

 

No the ESA payments kept getting paid into the bank, we thought that as they take an age to sort anything out that was the reason why. We have got letters from them saying that his benefit would stop in Nov as he would have reached the 365 days, then another letter to say they will stop in Dec, but they never did. We then thought that at some stage they would realise their mistake and take the money back, like I said it has never been spent and is there in the bank to pay it back.

He worked 37 hours a week and the weekly pay was around £230 take home pay, this was the first round of employment and lasted 4 months, then he was out of work for 2 months, claiming nothing as he was looking for work, but the payments were still being paid, then he got another job in Jan that lasted 7 weeks, this job he had to register as self employed, which he did, then when he left after 7 weeks, he didn't work again until may, when that job lasted 2 weeks.

So in all of this on off employment, he has always given his Nat Ins number and P45's in, surely they would see that if he was trying to cheat, he would not really give them the correct info, all the jobs were full time, the last one being paid the min wage.

So I could see how this could look, but like I said, we have a copy of the letter that he had written to them telling them of a change in circumstances, as I have copies of all the correspondence from them, how will they treat this?

I feel sick with worry, cannot sleep, or eat, most of the time it has been me on the phone to them as he cannot speak well on the phone, but he has always given them permission to speak to me.

Forgot to say it was contribution based ESA in the support group, don't know if that makes any difference to anything.

Edited by pottyprincess
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well my fears are that they could prosecute, your life is in their hands at the end of the day. I said to h that he just tells them exactly what happened and that's all he can do, they may say that he/we did not do enough to stop them paying the benefit, but you would think that a letter would be enough wouldn't you, we have not used the benefit system before so we don't know of the timescales involved as to how things work, naïve probably, yes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and my sympathies.

 

I had a similar situation not so long ago but I was not as peaceful as you about it.

 

I went to my MP and got him to support me and I then went to the DSW and complained loudly, first at the front desk, then to the 'manager' they offered to talk to me. I recorded the conversation and then went directly to our local newspaper and gave them the tape machine.

 

The newspaper contacted the DSW saying they were thinking of writing an article but it was dropped. Instantly.

 

I told the newspaper my MP was involved and he was. Whether he'd actually do anything I don't kn ow.

 

This shows they knew they were wrong and wanted to hide like quickly.

 

You have done everything in an honest and forthright manner and the government must be made to act correctly and admit fault when wrong. They are supposed to serve us not pressure from above to get convictions, willy nilly. Never forget most of the employees are without good education and almost no worthwhile training.

 

Any help wanted from you, by me = welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Zanderland, thank you so much for your reply, it helps to know that somebody else has been in the same or similar situation.

 

 

Did you get accused of not telling them your circumstances had changed, even when you had sent them a letter.

 

 

How long did all this take you to sort out and did they ask you to an interview under caution.

 

 

What were the figures involved? we do not know anything yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow... "Without good education". Rather sweeping. What's the DSW? Anyway, moving on...

 

Yes they should have acted upon your letter. However your husband is simply being asked to come and give an explanation of what has lead to the overpayment.

 

You are welcome to write to your MP, but I suspect the reply will be that you have just been asked to come in and give an explanation. It would appear that they did not get your letter, so until they ask the question how do they know that you sent it?

 

Have you any idea of the amount of your overpayment?

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Shoelover, I am sorry I do not know the overpayment yet, like I mentioned before, the money is in the bank, never been touched, I work and always have, they know this too.

Believe it or not, I have said to my h, look at it from their point of view, you have been paying tax, giving in your P45, they want to know what has been happening, I can understand that, just go in and give an account of your actions.

I have read these awful stories where they will blame the claimant, and I am freaking out if it goes to court, I don't see why it should, but you never know, and how long after the interview will it take to be told anything? thanks for you insight, much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The money being untouched is an important point.. That in my opinion shows that you didn't intend to keep it. Yes, you should have been more proactive in sorting it but what you have said so far makes it sound to me as if you were not "dishonest". Have you got evidence that it's in the bank? Take it to the interview.

 

It can take a few weeks after interview to get a decision about how much the overpayment is, which will have a bearing on what actin they take. Then a couple more weeks for the manager to make a decision as to what action. Most investigators if you ask them will give you a ring and tell you as soon as they have their managers decision.

 

I can't tell you that it won't go to court because it can't be ruled out. If it does, as a first offence and as it appears there isn't any real intent then a court is likely to not be especially harsh. The cases you read in the news tend to be the more interesting ones with bigger overpayments- I know people worry about being in the press,

 

You are doing your best to put this right. They may well not prosecute your DH.

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Shoelover, you have put my mind at a little more ease, I did not think to take the bank statement with us, how would they calculate the over payment, would they take it from the day he started work till the day he finished, as in 4 months, then he was out of work again for 4 months, then back for 7 weeks, then again another out of work period, until he got his latest job which only lasted 9 days. If they take it from the day he started work as stated in the letter he wrote, then we are looking at a year approx.

I think he has tried so hard to work, but with his medical condition and I do have a letter from one of his consultants to say that he has very high anxiety and depression levels to cope with too, it has all been a big nightmare.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Shoelover,

 

 

I cannot thank you enough, for your replies, they are making me get a grip to be honest, I think if it was only the times he worked then it might be a little over £2000, obviously if it was from the date of the letter asking them to stop any benefit he gets, then it would be a year of overpayment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been reading and it seems the rule of thumb is anything over £2000 and they will prosecute, doesn't matter how I do the figures it comes to over that amount, so he is maybe looking at going to court, panicking again!!!! maybe I should just stop doing all this reading and just wait and see.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well now I am just getting together the medical notes, showing that a consultant said that h suffers with high levels of anxiety and depression, bank statement to show that the money has not been spent, any relevant paperwork really, I have a character reference that I found, done by one of his old employers a few years ago, wondered if that would help, and just hope that h can do the interview, he is not good under pressure, not good at all, I was wondering if it would be possible for him to make a statement and read it out before the questions start, would that be a good idea or not?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take advice from your legal rep about the prepared statement.

 

There is still a threshold of £2k, but lots of people get IUC'd and don't go to court for £2k. I'm not saying it will be any fun BUT the folks with horror stories tend to be the ones to post on line.

 

I think keep reading is just going to make you feel worse - it will change nothing but give you sleepless nights.

 

You really are doing the best thing, when is the appointment?

 

If he is not good under pressure it may be worth him having an appropriate adult - this can be in addition to his legal rep. It may well help him x

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Shoelover

 

 

Thank you so much, I have read about the prepared statement, I think in H's case it would be very good idea, we will take advice from the legal adviser, I am unsure about things like adverse inference, I think that means being pre-warned to the questions so as to have a defence ready, anyway I am sure that I do not need to worry about that.

 

 

How many questions roughly will he have to face?

 

 

Would I be able to be the appropriate adult?

 

 

I slept a little better last night, but it is the last thing on my mind before I go to sleep and the first thing on my mind when I wake up.

 

 

I truly wish that we had not gone on believing that it was just a case of they will sort it out.

 

 

I still do not understand why he received letters saying that his benefit would stop in Nov, then another letter saying Dec because he had got to 365 days, very confusing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello PP.

 

I'm sure shoelover will get here when they can, but please bear with us because it's the weekend.

 

I stand to be corrected, but I think I've seen adverse inference in relation to someone who goes to the interview and answers 'No comment' to all the questions.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...