Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • if i remember rightly, long ago in one of the first drafts of the old proposed gov't overhauls, there was a listing of recommended 'charges' that inc wrong reg = £20. some PPC's implemented such changes in advance. then later as it looked increasing likely the new code was never going to be implemented after it's 1st review and another set of codes was to be debated they all quietly revert back .......... dx
    • Potentially it may not even get sold on? Just the default left for 6 years then gone? but if it is sold on ill get a letter from the DCA which is the notice of assignment? Sorry what is the different between a default notice and a default cal marker? yes, i may try and work arrangements out with the OCs after the breathing space but I'll see my circumstances then thank you again for all your help and patience, I really appreciate it and apologies If i am too fast or repeating myself.
    • receiving a default NOTICE (forget simple default cal markers) does not mean it will get sold on... OC's very very rarely do court themselves.  if it does you would receive a Notice of Assignment from the debt buyer/DCA.  as for reduced payment if it remains with the OC and they issue a DN, no harm in trying but lets get all your ducks inline first. dx  
    • okay thanks do you know how long it will take for it to get to the DCA or could the OC try and issue a CCJ? even though it's unlikely also for example would the OC agree to a reduction and a small payment over a super lengthy period of time if agreed? Rather than go through chasing apologies again for all the questions, just trying to understand all the possible scenarios.  
    • Currently - "the maximum daily price at 100p / kWh for electricity and 30p / kWh for gas – keep in mind that's a lot higher than the Ofgem Energy Price Cap, so if you can't afford prices to increase further, you're probably better off sticking with a protected tariff such as Flexible Octopus." Octopus Tracker is a product of our labs, available now to customers through our beta programme. Octopus Tracker is a beta product. Some things may not work the first time, and installations and processes may take longer than we'd like. Third party tech like In-home Displays won't always work, and on occasion data issues with smart meters can take significant time to fix or prevent things from working at all.   Copied straight from octopus   Feel free to shove it somewhere else    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Private parking charge Notices ParkingDirectUK - help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2885 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We are the owner / occupiers of an apartment in London that, under the lease, includes the right to a car space in the building.

 

The property managers use a permit system which requires all cars parked in the building to display an annually renewable permit.

 

They employ a private parking company to monitor the parking in the building.

 

We recently returned from an overseas holiday to find that we had received five parking chargelink3.gif Notice over a two week period totalling £500 for not displaying a current permit.

 

The permits had expired during our absence and the property manager had not advised us by email, as they have in the past, that we needed to take action to renew the permits by a given date.

 

We have asked the property manager to request the parking company to waive the parking chargelink3.gif Notices but they have refused to do so.

 

We have appealed the fines to POPLA and that process is still in progress.

 

The parking company are now threatening court proceedings or the use of a debt collection agency if we do not pay within 14 days.

 

We now find ourselves in a situation from which we currently see no alternative other than to pay a private parking company £500 in parking chargelink3.gif Notices for parking our car in the building carpark in which we have the legal right to park.

 

It seems absurd and very unfair to us but we do not know where we stand legally and hence this request for help.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you please clarify where on any of the paperwork you have

that they use the word FINE?

 

 

your lease and rights to park

quosh any speculative invoice

any private parking company litter you with

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My terminology may be wrong. They refer to it as a Parking Charge Notice.

 

Within the definitions section of the lease it says "parking space" and then in the schedule there is a paragraph that gives us the exclusive right to park one car in the parking space. Specific parking spaces are not allocated to the individual, just that we have the right to a parking space on a particular level of the building.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lease trumps made up invoice!

 

They wont go near court.

 

The company concerned is a fairly large, London based parking company that deals with several apartment buildings. I'm assuming, maybe incorrectly, that they will carry their threats through.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The company concerned is a fairly large, London based parking company that deals with several apartment buildings. I'm assuming, maybe incorrectly, that they will carry their threats through.

 

I'm willing to bet they won't :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing to do with 'terminology'

 

 

its not a FINE

only council/police/council can fine you for parking.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've moved you to the private parking forum

here you will see 1000's of threads concerning your PPC

please name them

else we cant advise tailored help

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lease trumps made up invoices

they don't own the land

the land owners do..

you have it in your lease so that trumps any invoices they spew out.

 

 

 

 

https://cse.google.co.uk/cse?cx=partner-pub-0964707606882478:652l7hswbgv&ie=UTF-8&q=Parking+Direct+UK+&sa=Search+CAG#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=Parking%20Direct%20UK&gsc.page=1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My concern is that the landowners, through the property managers, refuse to take any action.

 

 

They argue that the 'fines' should be paid as we did not follow the landlord's requirement

to renew our annual permit and there are plenty of signs to indicate that parking without a valid permit

is liable to lead to an infringement notice.

 

I cannot argue against that.

We were aware that an annual permit is required,

despite the fact that our lease provides us with the legal right to a parking space.

 

 

Unfortunately, we were away at the time a rote letter was placed in our mailbox advising us that the permit had to be renewed.

As a result, we were unable to comply with the landlord's requirements to have a valid, up-to-date permit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The company concerned is a fairly large, London based parking company that deals with several apartment buildings. I'm assuming, maybe incorrectly, that they will carry their threats through.

 

As already stated, your lease trumps an invoice from a PPC.

 

Park Direct UK Ltd are not ' a fairly large ' PPC, but are in fact a particularly dodgy one. They changed their name from Park Direct Ltd due to their particularly unsavoury tactics.

 

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/05183949/filing-history

 

http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/a-warning-to-potential-customers-of.html

 

They have now moved tothe IPC since your event, which sums them up really...

 

They issued no court proceedings in 2014, none in 2015, and have yet to in 2016...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...