Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Paper needs a little help-investigating alleged Tory election fraud.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2887 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Mirror Online wants to publish the electoral spending returns of every one of this Government's 330 MPs - so you can hold them to account on their spending

We aim to publish online the electoral spending returns of every one of this Government's 330 MPs for the country to judge whether they were entirely truthful about their spending.

 

The Mirror was the first to break the story in March that more than two dozen Tory MPs benefited from battlebuses packed with Tory activists but failed to declare any of the costs.

Much more on the link.:shock:

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/part-daily-mirror-peoples-electoral-8041095#ICID=sharebar_twitter

Link to post
Share on other sites

how about them publishing the spending of ALL the mp's not the conservative one or is this what they called balanced reporting . and btw i dont support any of the three main parties they are all the same

Link to post
Share on other sites

how about them publishing the spending of ALL the mp's not the conservative one or is this what they called balanced reporting . and btw i dont support any of the three main parties they are all the same

 

Presumably they intend to publish the spending by the Tories since a specific allegation has been made about them and not about anyone else. That seems reasonable enough.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, it's not just the EU bureaucrats who are unaccounted, it's also our born and bred ones. Interesting.

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for Poundland"

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, it's not just the EU bureaucrats who are unaccounted, it's also our born and bred ones. Interesting.

 

Indeed.

They should all be declared and published,

as should the way they vote in parliament as they are voting on behalf of their voters, and should be accountable.

 

This is very different to national voting where there is far more reason for them to have a private and personal vote just as everyone else does, no matter how much we would rather see if their actions meet their rhetoric.

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just been looking for the latest on this story.

Where Tory election fraud claims are being investigated, in one map

http://indy100.independent.co.uk/article/where-tory-election-fraud-claims-are-being-investigated-in-one-map--bylZ35tQIXb

 

ICYMI, the Conservative general election expenses scandal is growing

http://indy100.independent.co.uk/article/icymi-the-conservative-general-election-expenses-scandal-is-growing--WJg3Ui2eHzW

 

David Cameron admits Tories may have 'misdeclared' election spending - but denies they broke the law

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/david-cameron-admits-tories-misdeclared-8024843

 

Unprecedented: Electoral Commision threaten Tory party with court over election fraud Michael Crick

 

David Cameron admits Tories may have 'misdeclared' election spending - but denies they broke the law

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kr59eMx2ck

 

Oh well,David Cameron says the Conservatives are gripping this.

That is a relief.

It will be interesting to see how this pans out.

Unbiased as always,

Tawnyowl.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well when i first came across this story i thought,mmm, a storm in a tea cup.Quick post in the Bear Garden,see what others think.

Now i am beginning to think this is a storm in a teapot,a huge one at that.

 

Some more links.

The 4 vital developments in last 48 hours in the Tory election fraud scandal

http://www.thecanary.co/2016/05/27/4-vital-developments-last-48-hours-tory-election-fraud-scandal/

 

Grant Shapps goes to pieces on live television over the Tory election fraud scandal (VIDEO)

http://www.thecanary.co/2016/05/04/grant-shapps-goes-pieces-live-television-tory-election-fraud-scandal-video/

 

Grant Shapps is this the chap who flip flopped in the Payday Loan fiasco promising one thing in a written article. then when in power doing the exact opposite.

 

Is the BBC going big time on this,just wondering.

 

If you feel so inclined this Mirror Article tells you what you can do to help a little.

Up to you.

Be part of the Daily Mirror People's Electoral Commission and help us investigate alleged Tory election fraud

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/part-daily-mirror-peoples-electoral-8041095

 

Many must be in shock at these allegations.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am convinced that the Tories bought the last election and it will be interesting whether anything comes from the various investigations. I told my local Lib Dem MP who lost out to a Tory, that he had been beaten by the Tories spending hundreds of thousands. The Tories spent two years issuing huge amounts of campaign material and in the week of the election i have never seen so much activity.

 

And look at the legislation being passed. A bill to prevent charities campaigning on issues which are deemed political. The Trade Union bill looking at how Labour are financed. Meanwhile no limits on donations to parties by rich individuals.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am convinced that the Tories bought the last election and it will be interesting whether anything comes from the various investigations..

 

Despite my firm belief that the current Tory rulers are liars who drive their own agendas, I dont think they bought the election victory, although what you suggest may be a small part of it.

 

Labour were completely incompetent bafoons who completely failed to address the voting publics issues, and still do.

I watched Harriet Harmond just a week ago still saying 'we did not get our message across to the public' completely avoiding the simple fact that they did get their message across, and the public didn't like what they were hearing.

 

I'm reasonably certain that even without the EU referendum bribe, The tories didn't really win the vote - Labour threw it away by making themselves unelectable.

 

The Tories seemed to be the lessor evil, and remained such until all the lies really started to become clear. Even now Labour is utterly incompetently NOT highlighting these Tory lies effectively.

 

it seems to me that even to those minority who are aware of the utterly blatant misleading from the Tories (a minority thanks to Labours incompetence0 there isnt much to choose between them.

 

Incompetence vs legalspeak (lies to mere mortals)

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...