Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If Labour are elected I hope they go after everyone who made huge amounts of money out of this, by loading the company with debt. The sad thing is that some pension schemes, including the universities one, USS, will lose money along with customers.
    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

To tip or not to tip...your views wanted


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2881 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Restaurants could be stopped from adding a discretionary service charge to bills under Government plans to remind consumers that they do not have to tip when eating out.

 

Sajid Javid, the Business Secretary, is today launching a consultation on tipping amid concerns that restaurants are confusing customers by not being transparent about the charges and who actually receives any tips.

 

One option under consideration is to prevent restaurants “from suggesting any specific discretionary payments” to make it an “opt-in decision” for customers.

 

Under the proposals in the consultation, restaurants could be forced to make it clear that customers do not have to pay the discretionary service charge.

 

However, one plan being considered is abolishing the service charge entirely.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/01/restaurants-to-be-banned-from-adding-discretionary-charge-to-bil/

 

 

Give Your Views Here:

 

Online Survey

Link to post
Share on other sites

Restaurants could be stopped from adding a discretionary service charge to bills under Government plans to remind consumers that they do not have to tip when eating out.

 

Sajid Javid, the Business Secretary, is today launching a consultation on tipping amid concerns that restaurants are confusing customers by not being transparent about the charges and who actually receives any tips.

 

One option under consideration is to prevent restaurants “from suggesting any specific discretionary payments” to make it an “opt-in decision” for customers.

 

Under the proposals in the consultation, restaurants could be forced to make it clear that customers do not have to pay the discretionary service charge.

 

However, one plan being considered is abolishing the service charge entirely.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/01/restaurants-to-be-banned-from-adding-discretionary-charge-to-bil/

 

 

Give Your Views Here:

 

Online Survey

 

I tip 15% as a matter of routine, unless

A) They add a tip of 15% or less, where they get only what they have added, (so, if they decide for me it is 10%, that is reason enough for me to agree!) or

B) The service didn't deserve a tip, where I won't add one (or, if they have added it I'll ask for it to be removed, explaining why).

 

I ask the wait staff if they get the tip or if it goes to the company if I pay by card. If it all goes to the company (

Link to post
Share on other sites

A tip should never be a mandatory charge at all, it's a discretionary amount offered by the customer for good service. I was given a bill once that contained a "service charge". As the service I was given was absolutely appalling, I refused to pay that portion of the bill. They made a big fuss about it but I told them it was either that or nothing at all and they caved in because they knew it was really unenforceable.

 

If any establishment makes a service charge, the customer should be told how much BEFORE ordering, that gives them the opportunity to leave. Most places don't because they know the customer would leave straight away. However, unless you have been told there is a service charge before you order, you are not legally obliged to pay it as far as I'm aware.

 

Most places have a kitty that all the days tips are put into and is shared out amongst the staff working for that day. Some cafes I've been to, I have tipped well because their service was excellent and I knew all of the staff would benefit from it. Majority of places now have a tips pot near the till so you can put your tip in it when you pay the bill instead of leaving it on the table.

 

When it boils down to it, it's not for me to make up your employees wages if you refuse to pay them a decent wage, they can earn tips with good service AT MY DISCRETION.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I, personally, do not believe that a "service charge" should automatically be added to your bill.

 

Tips or gratuities are a purely voluntary payment and should not be expected or coerced.

 

The paying customer should not be put in a position where the feel that these charges are legitimate and need to be paid.

They should also not be put in the potentially awkward position of having to ask for them be removed if they disagree with it.

 

Why tip at all ?

These people do a job of work for which they receive a wage.

This wage is already included in the price you are paying.

 

In what other industry is there such an expectation to receive such a payment for job that you are already paid for ? Why is it so prevalent in the catering industry ?

 

The checkout assistants in my local supermarkets perform and provide a good service, do they expect and receive tips for doing their job ?

Do you tip the bus driver, postman (or woman), refuse collector, child's school teacher, call center operator ?

Probably not.

Why not, they all provide you with a service ?

 

Like those who work in catering, they all receive a wage which is collected from you via some form of billing.

 

All in all, I do not think tips should be expected or added.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am more than happy to tip for "excellent" service, because good service is the minimum I would expect.

 

 

When I was in Canada a few years ago, I felt very embarrassed at the hotel. Every half hour or so, staff would tap on the room door asking if you wanted bottled water, beds turned down, any thing else.. and I got the impression that they actually expected to be tipped for this "non" service !

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am more than happy to tip for "excellent" service, because good service is the minimum I would expect.

 

 

When I was in Canada a few years ago, I felt very embarrassed at the hotel. Every half hour or so, staff would tap on the room door asking if you wanted bottled water, beds turned down, any thing else.. and I got the impression that they actually expected to be tipped for this "non" service !

 

 

Exactly !

 

It is this expectation to receive these gratuitous payments that lead to these people who are only carrying out their job role often acting in a manor in attempt to extort such payments.

 

As you say, it is the standard expectation that can lead to the awkward moments or feeling pressured into making them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Hanc.

 

I think that the very idea of tipping is outdated and degrading. People should be paid a decent wage for doing their job, and should always do it to the best of their ability. It is often because the management know waiting staff and some others get tips that they often don't pay their staff properly. I was once a coach driver, when coach drivers got tips, and that was the excuse used by my boss for not paying me a decent wage.

 

Tipping is degrading because it harks back to the "master and servant" era, and I don't expect anyone to be my "servant", I just expect them to do their job and get paid properly for doing it.

 

Tips or a service charge should definitely not be added automatically to bills.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have mixed feelings on that. On the one hand, I do object when a restaurant adds the tip themselves: if the menu says £10, the bill should say £10 too, anything else would be dishonest advertising on their part. (I ate in one a few months ago which did this - something like 15% added at the end of the bill with a message like "if you don't want to pay this bit you can take it up with the manager". Not acceptable IMO.)

 

On the other, I feel waiting staff do generally make an effort to provide a good service; the possibility of a tip encourages this, and I like the ability to tip as a way to reward that. Take that away and we have no way to reward good service.

 

My take? Ban automatic "tips", since those aren't really tips at all - if they want a service charge, it should be included in the listed price. Require any sum paid in tips - whether cash, card or bartered in livestock - to go to the waiting staff, not the company or anything else. Don't ban the practice, though, it's a valuable feedback mechanism.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I prefer the american system. 18% is about average and 25% for exceptional service is the top end.

 

Service is not built into the price, the tip goes to the server, and you get much better service in my experience.

 

Tips should be an incentive for top service. I dislike our 'system' of adding service automatically to bills.

CAG has helped me so much since I joined. Based on what I have learnt from others on here and my own experiences, I try to chip in and help others from time to time. I am not an expert and give my opinion only. Always check with the more experienced CAG members before making important decisions.

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. I think employees' contracts should explain tipping arrangements.

2. Tipping arrangements should be printed on menus.

 

Pricing should be for consumables & nothing further should be added (e.g. service charge).

 

I rarely tip. If I do, it's usually in the form of not accepting my change.

 

My most significant 'tip' was to the lifeguards at a pool - having witnessed them pull a man out of the pool and revive him.

 

Mike.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A tip should never be a mandatory charge at all, it's a discretionary amount offered by the customer for good service. I was given a bill once that contained a "service charge". As the service I was given was absolutely appalling, I refused to pay that portion of the bill. They made a big fuss about it but I told them it was either that or nothing at all and they caved in because they knew it was really unenforceable.

 

Who's a big softie ;)

 

Service charge (that you didn't get) on the bill ? So the bill's wrong - and in such cases, you don't have to pay it - until they've sorted it out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have mixed feelings on that. On the one hand, I do object when a restaurant adds the tip themselves: if the menu says £10, the bill should say £10 too, anything else would be dishonest advertising on their part. (I ate in one a few months ago which did this - something like 15% added at the end of the bill with a message like "if you don't want to pay this bit you can take it up with the manager". Not acceptable IMO.)

Tear the bottom off the bill, write on your address and tell them to post you a correct bill.

 

On the other, I feel waiting staff do generally make an effort to provide a good service; the possibility of a tip encourages this, and I like the ability to tip as a way to reward that. Take that away and we have no way to reward good service.

I've known places where staff refuse tips cos it's not company policy.

 

My take? Ban automatic "tips", since those aren't really tips at all - if they want a service charge, it should be included in the listed price. Require any sum paid in tips - whether cash, card or bartered in livestock - to go to the waiting staff, not the company or anything else. Don't ban the practice, though, it's a valuable feedback mechanism.

 

And there's the other problem - why give it the waiting staff when the cook should get it ? I'm more likely to tip for the fantastickness of the food than how swishly it was delivered to the table.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And there's the other problem - why give it the waiting staff when the cook should get it ? I'm more likely to tip for the fantastickness of the food than how swishly it was delivered to the table.

 

This is yet more reason why I say let's do away with this archaic practice all together. People should do their job and get a reasonable wage for doing it. We don't tip most of the people who give us service, so why do we tip any? They are just doing their job.

 

I also don't like the idea that bosses can use tips as an argument against paying decent wages. Good service from someone in a service industry should be expected, poor service should be complained about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I only tip if I received good service.

Many times I waited to get a couple of pound change just to make a point of not leaving a tip.

Chefs are paid more than waiting staff because most times they don't get tips.

There's a local pub in old Windsor where they love me because of the good tips, but they only get it because they're good and food is excellent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And there's the other problem - why give it the waiting staff when the cook should get it ? I'm more likely to tip for the fantastickness of the food than how swishly it was delivered to the table.

 

This is another dimension of the discriminatory and inequitable tipping process.

Why should the chef get it ?

Why not the dishwasher ? What about the potato peeler ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, if the toilets were mind-blowingly impressive, it wouldn't go to the cook but the cleaner. We have the choice of who to award/reward if they've exceeded expectations. If everything is top notch then why not the management ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...