Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Apologies if this rambles slightly I feel a little brain dead after yesterday    I just want to know if I'm being unreasonable in one of my points (holding them responsible for costs to possibly damaged engine if I can get an engineer report)    Basically broke down in a layby on the a43, steam from bonnet high engine temps   RAC arrives declares it a minor leak and tops up then says OK to continue (4 miles to services) then recheck and says fine to drive home   30 miles later large amount of steam from engine and lose power, get it to hard shoulder   Next rac chap arrives and says it blowing like that may have damaged engine as it now doesn't start, says it will need a crane truck as 4wd and auto says priority job as 3 children on hardshoulder in the rain (1 in wheelchair)    3 hours later, I've chased rac twice and been rung by highways agency twice (who have also complained to rac)    Tow truck arrives (flat bed) advise them we were told it needs crane and drive says its OK it will run, after cranking engine for over 5 mins drives it onto truck pouring fluid out the bottom   I can't help but feel that him cranking engine that much when pouring fluid is likely to have done alot of damage as well as being told to continue on a leaking engine    
    • Thank you. I’ll sit on my hands, for now! 
    • 29 Farage Garages? or Just the latest of many Johnsons Follies?     "New photos show how the county nicknamed the Garden of England may soon be more accurately described as the nation’s lorry park – thanks to Brexit preparations. The images show the full jaw-dropping magnitude of a scheme (one of 29 such) which will see 27 acres of Kent’s green fields ripped up and concreted over to create a sprawling 2,000-vehicle holding facility for trucks crossing the Channel."   https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/brexit-news-uk-kent-lorry-park-channel-crossing-b1278893.html   From comments: They promised us the easiest deal in history. Frictionless trade. And better jobs for the "forgotten". This is what we get. ... lorry dumps and portaloos that come to symbolize this incompetent callous government.
    • Top paediatricians have written an open letter to government about children going hungry and supporting Marcus Rashford's campaign.   https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/oct/24/open-letter-from-uk-paediatricians-about-free-school-meals
    • It's not worth appealing because ECP won't listen, unfortunately, plus you can give the impression that if they lean on you, you'll pay them money when you don't need to. The only time we normally advise writing to them is if you get a Letter Before Claim/Action.   Best to say nothing for now and if you do get a LBC, we'll help you to draft something. Have a read around some other parking threads and you'll get an idea of how these people operate.
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
       
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
       
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
       
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
       
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
       
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
       
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
       
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
       
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
       
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
       
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
       
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
       
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
       
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
       
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
       
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
       
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

lukeyboy1 vs Clydesdale PPI: Ombudsman upheld complaint ***Success ***


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1250 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi.

 

I recently submitted a complaint to Clydesdale Bank Plc regarding a credit card I had dating from early 1997. The complaint was declined, and I subsequently complained to the Financial Ombudsman.

 

The good news is that the Ombudsman wrote saying that the Clydesdale were going to make me an "offer".

 

Of course, I'm still waiting, and so to pass the time, I've put together a spreadsheet based on a previous one that I've seen used that calculates the PPI amount plus paid CC interest and then adds on statutory simple 8% interest to both.

 

I guess I wanted to know if my assumptions are correct.

 

Depending on the APR that I used, my calculations indicate that I could be due a compensation payment of anywhere from around 8K to > 40K even as high as 76K potentially (depends on how the calc is done).

 

(As background, for a long time before my current job, I was stuck in the proverbial hole, card maxed out, paying interest by the bucketload and also paying late charges and the like - couldn't get out of it - mostly paid the minumum, or ran behind, it was a nightmare!).

 

Potential Claim : 76,484.31

PPI Paid: 4,328.45

CC Interest Paid : 31,759.29

8% Simple on Principle Plus Int : 40,396.57

 

Two questions:

 

1. Have I got the calcs right?

2. Can I claim 8% on the credit card interest that I've calculated to have paid as well (i.e. 8% on the 31K as per my calls, or just 8% on the PPI figure of 4.3K?)

 

Interested in your thoughts people!

 

interestcalcs_pub.xls

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

That doesn't look right.

 

What you'll get back is all the premiums you paid, plus the interest (at the card rate) paid on those premiums. You won't get a refund of all the interest you paid on the card overall.

 

The 8% will only apply where your card account would've been in credit had it not been for PPI. What Clydesdale ought to do is reconstruct your account to get a picture of what it would have looked like had you not taken out PPI. If there are any occasions where your account would've been in credit, you'll get 8% interest on that amount. You will not get 8% on the total amount - and it may be the case that you'll not be entitled to any interest at 8% at all.

Warning: Freemen of the Land Operate here. Think twice before accepting 'legal advice'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that.

 

So since my card had a balance all the time would the interest at the CC rate be calculated back (18.9%) Apr in simple terms since it was incurred (ie is my calculation of interest on say PPI paid 24 pounds subject to CC interest until 2012 or so in theory, given that I never managed to pay my CC off until 2011?)

 

Note: CC interest paid is NOT interest on the whole balance - it's a calculation of interest at the CC rate on each PPI amount from the date of the charge until now) - the assumption is that the card always had a balance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you should ideally use the fosrunning

but you can use the cifos sheet too

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?330996-Latest-Spreadsheets-PPI-Claims-and-Charges-Claims-Dec-2011

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

FosRunningPPI v102.xls

 

Well - okay - embarrassingly, here's a picture of my finances at that time.

 

 

I was so stupid with my money and it took me a long time to

(a) realise my issues, and

(b) make sure I paid things off!

 

Sheesh.

 

However, the figures indicate around 57K owing: wow!

 

Not sure how accurate it is, I don't have all my statements, but it's close enough to give an indication I'd say!

Link to post
Share on other sites

wow looks ok as

why not try the fos ci one too

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the feedback.

 

My prediction - total lowball offer of like 3.7k (the average) but I've still to wait 6 weeks or so at least.......

Link to post
Share on other sites

FosCISheet v101-lukeyboy1.xls

 

Here's the FOS sheet. It shows a total of :-

 

PPI Paid :- 3497.12

Compound Interest: £34,869.34

Total : £38,366.46

 

Seems like it's in the ball park, I guess? I don't have exact figures to hand, but I think it's fairly accurate as I hang my head in shame in terms of how I ran the account.....lesson learned!

Link to post
Share on other sites

lots of years with lots of months

where the PPI is the same value

cant be if you made a payment in that month.

 

 

is the card still active?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
lots of years with lots of months

where the PPI is the same value

cant be if you made a payment in that month.

 

 

is the card still active?

 

 

These are estimated values for right now, and yeah the card is active still!

Link to post
Share on other sites

you cant simply nor blindly make up an estimate for a year..

then have a diff estimate in another year

shows you hold no data.

 

 

I take it you simply went in blind without sending an sar first?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

should have been the first thing you did

rather than the last.

no matter

you should have enough time before you get to being in a time limit to accept the offer.

 

my only worry is they'll faff you around

as Clydesdale data got moved around lots of times .

 

although[and use this to your advantage:madgrin:]

 

if they are making an offer

they must have the info......

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
should have been the first thing you did

rather than the last.

no matter

you should have enough time before you get to being in a time limit to accept the offer.

 

my only worry is they'll faff you around

as Clydesdale data got moved around lots of times .

 

although[and use this to your advantage:madgrin:]

 

if they are making an offer

they must have the info......

 

dx

 

Thanks! Yeah - the fact that the ombudsman is involved gives me a little confidence though......

Link to post
Share on other sites
You said you paid off the card in 2011 but you have lots of entries right up to april this year??

 

I still use it and sometimes I will have a balance on it - not at the same level of ten years ago though!

Link to post
Share on other sites
You said you paid off the card in 2011 but you have lots of entries right up to april this year??

 

Update : SAR request sent off, that should arrive just before the 8 week deadline, I don't expect Clydesdale to offer before then, from what I have seen!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Update: sucess : offer of 14.6k minus tax, ends up around 13.7 after tax! Woo! Need to decide if that offer is roughly right, though......

Link to post
Share on other sites

gonna have to await the sar statements me thinks

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah. Wish I'd sent them before......

 

The offer is:

 

3751.19 total premiums

1418.12 charges which would not have applied to my account

5183.25 - interest in respect of those premiums and charges

4512.22 - interest at 8 pc monthly credit interest in reconstructed balances

 

It all seems about right - I guess my only real question is the 5k figure - could well be way way higher?

 

What's anyone's throughts on this offer?

Link to post
Share on other sites

its very diff to do with PPI+charges

you'd have to do the fosrunning one. spreadsheet

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you'd be getting extra run of the 8% stat int anyway or should do till the day the y settle

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Does anyone think I should be asking for compensation in addition, considering I've been mucked around for 3 (nearly 4) years?

I would, FOS have told Canada Square to pay me extra compensation for them mucking me about for 4 and a half years.

REMEMBER! Hunger is the enemy - NOT the hungry!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...