Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Paragraph 18 – you are still talking about Boston stolen items. About time this was fixed??? Paragraph 19  In any event, the claimant's PS5 gaming device was correctly declared and correctly valued. The defendant accepted it for carriage and was even prepared to earn extra money by selling sell insurance in case of its loss or damage. New paragraph 20 – this the defendant routinely sells insurance in respect of "no compensation" items (a secondary contract contrary to section 72 CRA 2015) new paragraph above paragraph 20 – the defendant purports to limit its liability in respect of lost or damaged items. This is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015. The defendant offers to extend their liability if their customer purchases an insurance cover for an extra sum of money. This insurance is a secondary contract calculated to exclude or limit their liability for the defendants contractual breaches and is contrary to section 72 of the consumer rights act 2015. New paragraph below paragraph 42 – the defendant merely relies on "standard industry practice" You haven't pointed to the place in your bundle of the Telegraph newspaper extract. You have to jiggle the paragraphs around. Even though I have suggested new paragraph numbers, the order I have suggested is on your existing version 5. You will have to work it out for your next version. Good luck!   Let's see version 6 Separately, would you be kind enough to send me an unredacted to me at our admin email address.
    • UK travellers have been turned away at airports because their passports are not valid for EU travel.View the full article
    • i think theres been MORE than amble evidence of that and am astonished that criminal proceedings haven't begun.
    • Yep, those 'requirements' not met to shareholders satisfaction seem to me to be: 1. Not being allowed to increase customer bills by 40% (of which well over 50% of the new total would NOT be investment) 2. 1 plus regulators not agreeing to letting them do 'things in their own time (ie carry on regardless)
    • As already mentioned freely available "credit scores" are fairly useless. All lenders have their own "credit scoring" system, that for obvious reasons they don't divulge. And they're "scored" differently to the freely available ones. As soon as they could, we've always encouraged our two children to use credit cards responsibly... Pay off in full, etc, to generate good history. It's paid off. At quite young ages, they have both obtained loans for cars, mortgage and their credit card limits are through the roof. Personally, I have shifted debt around a lot on credit cards (even financed a house purchase once at 0% 😉) and I've only ever been refused a credit card once, sorry twice by the same company, over many years. They must have something very different in their lending criteria. You're a tight one, Mr Branson.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2869 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello I am looking for a little advice please in relation to a Statutory Demand - this has been sent to me and I am unsure who i respond to, do I print off the 6.4 and 6.5 forms for setting the stat demand aside which is what I wish to try and do and sensd it to the creditor or do i send it to the courts? The statutory demand received is not stamped by the court so i don't know if I am meant to send it to the court or the creditor or both?

 

Thank you in advance for your help

 

(Name removed)

Edited by Andyorch
name removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

And for what type of debt...amount ...petitioner?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

it is actually my dad who received it and it was sent by a tenant who trades as Worldwide Confidential Services (WCS)

- he has been living in our property rent free since April 2014

in exchange for help with financial / property and other issues my parents have.

 

 

It is very complicated but he claims my dad owes £30+k for hours he worked when in actual fact he got free rent for helping.....

 

 

The problem is he states he has some agreement which apparently my dad signed

stating that he would pay him so much per hour

- my dad doe not believe he has signed anything and looking through everything I can't see this either...

 

 

This tenant has recently fraudulently signed an agreement for selling a property of ours

- he forced my dad to sell then on his signature as a witness he signed it in a fake name..

 

 

. The stat demand shows his wife's name claiming under WCS as I guess that way

we can't say anything as she has not been involved....

 

This is all very complicated

but right now i just have no idea who to send the 6.4 & 6.5 forms to and if we are to respond WCS who sent it...

 

 

. The stat demand has not been stamped by the courts

i assume they have just printed it but then i do not have a clue if they are to get it stamped before sending it to my dad.

 

I hope all of this makes sense. Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stat demands do not see the inside of a court until you dispute it (set a side ) or the petitioner proceeds to and files for Bankruptcy.

 

Forms 6.4 and 6.5 in the link below.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?406102-LEGAL-Form-6.4-amp-6.5-Application-to-set-a-side-a-Statutory-Demand

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy, so send the set aside to the named court? should we also write back to the petitioner in the meantime to dispute or wait for our day in Court?

 

No requirement to talk to the petitioner yet...simply submit your set a side and attach your affidavit stating the grounds of the dispute and why you feel the SD has no merit.

 

You are aware of the timelines I assume in making the set a side?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy, I believe its 18 days?

 

My parents were going to drop it off at the court in person yesterday but they received some odd advice when they rang the court about it not having a court stamp on it hence all the confusion, from my reading anyone can fill in a stat demand form and send it without any involvement from the court.

 

The SD refers to an agreement my father has supposedly signed which they have not produced when I requested a copy of it, they actually suggested we pay the solicitor who drew this up £800 to get a copy!

 

It's a complex mess sadly as my Father is not a well man in his 70's with heart trouble, diabetes and tinnitus, it looks like they have been taken advantage of by someone who was supposed to help them... the company in question also is holding a further 22k of my parents money on account and refuse to release it or vacate the property they are in due to this agreement which can't be produced! the agreement supposedly also gives them a 3 year option on the property and full refund of any money they spend on it so they claim a section 21 isn't valid here.

 

Worse is that the company are supposed legal specialists, the owners are not actually solicitors or barristers they offer advice but always use a certain solicitor when it comes to court matters, however their solicitor has also been acting for my parents, what a mess :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...