Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2903 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I suspect that I have been illegaly evicted by my Estate Agent, who let two strangers into my house while I was away. Men claimed to be HCEO and gave me Writ of Possession and Control. But after a week of research I am almost sure that document was manufactured.

 

Can anyone tell me what should be included on the legal Combined Writ of P. And Control (which seals,any signatures?) from HC QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION

 

I would be thankful for any help

Edited by honeybee13
Paras.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I suspect that I have been illegaly evicted by my Estate Agent, who let two strangers into my house while I was away. Men claimed to be HCEO and gave me Writ of Possession and Control. But after a week of research I am almost sure that document was manufactured.

 

Can anyone tell me what should be included on the legal Combined Writ of P. And Control (which seals,any signatures?) from HC QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION

 

I would be thankful for any help

 

The High Court will be able to confirm if it issued the writ.

 

If it did issue it, you'd have to show the writ you were given a copy of had been falsified, and it would be daft to do that if there was a legitimate writ.

If it didn't issue it, they could advise on if the court would want the details or if it should be reported to the police.

 

You've not said it was in a District Registry, so unless it was, try the Enquiries number for the main RCJ building : 020 7947 6000

Quote the case number from the writ.

 

Had there been ongoing eviction proceedings? (For a residential eviction there would have been a possession order from a County Court for it to have been 'transferred up' to the High Court, allowing for a visit (with no new prior notice) from an HCEO).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did not receive any Possession Order from CC. Writ has got only Queen's Bench Action Depart. Seal-seems to be fake. There are grammar mistakes: Queens Bench Division instead "Queen's Bench Division", Right Hon -should be Rt. Hon.,old form and much more. Instead of -so called- 'authorised EO' a woman - Claire Louise Sandbrook (who is not a HCEO), came two men who refused to tell their names

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did not receive any Possession Order from CC. Writ has got only Queen's Bench Action Depart. Seal-seems to be fake. There are grammar mistakes: Queens Bench Division instead "Queen's Bench Division", Right Hon -should be Rt. Hon.,old form and much more. Instead of -so called- 'authorised EO' a woman - Claire Louise Sandbrook (who is not a HCEO), came two men who refused to tell their names

 

Is it supposed to be a copy of the actual writ? Or a notice the writ has been issued??

 

With the seal on it it should be a copy of the writ : so, does it have a case / claim number??.

 

"I did not receive any Possession Order from CC." : had you had ANY notice of CC possession hearing?

Had you received a S21 or other notice that the LL was seeking to end the tenancy?

Giving only part of the story risks poor advice being offered.

 

Reading back : "I suspect that I have been illegaly evicted by my Estate Agent" : do you mean "letting agent"??

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, firstly you need to establish which company evicted you as Claire Sandbrook offers the use of her HCEO authority to several different UK businesses at present. She now lives in the USA.

 

The writ of possession itself will not usually detail the company she has given it to to enforce. However, the paperwork you have is likely a copy and will not be the original.

 

Once you have established which company has evicted you, you can then contact them and ask for a copy of the original writ to ensure it was lawfully obtained. There has been a change in legal process recently and writs of possession must now be obtained using a form PF92 or PF88 and not the previous method which used form N293A. You should ask the company for a copy of the forms used to corroborate this.

 

You should have also been aware of proceedings issued against you and it is a requirement that all parties subject to the possession are notified in advance (usually 7 days). And further to this you should have received a Notice of Enforcement for the monetary aspect of the judgment. It doesn't sound right if nothing was received.

 

It would make sense to get some proper legal advice here as it is a complicated area of law which has been further complicated recently regarding the way in which High Court Enforcement Officers evict tenants. Most lawyers will usually give you a free consultation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This document should be seen by professional HCEO. When I asked in HC about the Writ they wanted to know from which HC QBD IS THIS WRIT. ACTUALLY- I DON'T KNOW. UNKNOWN HC,UNKNOWN DISTRICT. And this should be on the writ. That's what I've been told yesterday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could send it to the HCEOA for verification if you are concerned it is fraudulent.

 

High Court Enforcement Officers Association

Drake House, Gadbrook Park

Northwich

Cheshire

England

CW9 7RA

E-mail: [email protected]

Telephone: 08448 244575

 

As I mentioned previously, it is very likely that you only have a copy of the writ of possession but this copy should detail where the original was sealed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For a residential eviction there would have been a possession order from a County Court for it to have been 'transferred up' to the High Court, allowing for a visit (with no new prior notice) from an HCEO).

 

BazzaS, for info that is not correct anymore, notice must be given when the writ of possession is being applied for. This could be by the landlord or by the HCEO. Whilst this may not give the exact date of the eviction each party subject to it will be aware.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What if I would go back,saying to letting agent that I want to get the rest of my furniture,clothes etc. And refuse to leave? If I didn't get PF92,then it was illegal and High Court did not agree to (even) enter the property. What do you think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What if I would go back,saying to letting agent that I want to get the rest of my furniture,clothes etc. And refuse to leave? If I didn't get PF92,then it was illegal and High Court did not agree to (even) enter the property. What do you think?

 

That is not advisable and the chances are you will be accompanied by the enforcement agents anyway. You could also be arrested.

 

And consider that for them to evict you there must have been an order for possession. You were therefore required to leave the property by order of the court.

 

The first thing you need to do is establish whether the correct procedures have been followed, for the Section 21 Notice, through to the application for an order for possession, if the writ of possession was obtained lawfully and why you never had notice of all of this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone confirm that CLAIRE LOUISE SANDBROOK IS an Enforcement Officer?? And I did not mean Claire Sandbrook.

 

As Ploddertom has quite correctly stated, Claire Sandbrook is an authorised High Court Enforcement Agent. The official Directory is here:

 

http://www.hceoa.org.uk/members/authorised-members-directory.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you tell me please where can I check this?

 

Claire (Louise) Sandbrook HCEO ( former Director of Sherforce Ltd) rents herself out to(among others) dcbl aka Direct Collction Bailffs Ltd as HCEO. She now resides in the USA but remains an appointed HCEO here in the UK

 

http://www.dcbltd.com/about_us/

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have got a riddle for you.

My Writ contains such a statement:

"THIS WRIT was issued by the Central Office of the High Court on 25/04/2016 on the application of The Sheriffs Lodgment Centre being a Division Sherwins Ltd of 1 Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1BR Ref no SLC 266480 as agents for:"

 

Any sugestions? I can give you a tip if you like.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not just scan the documents you have received and post them here (less any identifiable data) which would be far better that drip feeding sections of the Writ.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...