Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

April 2015 PCN from Excel Parking Services - Now BW Legal writing


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2923 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi!

 

Firstly i am new here and just looking for a bit of advice, my issue is as follows:

 

Last April (2015) I parked in an Excel car park in Nottingham and bought a ticket and returned within the stated time

- not a problem.

 

 

However, i was sent a PCN by Excel for being parked slightly outside the white line of the bay..

At the time in question there were building works going on in the car park

and a lot of builders dust everywhere obscuring things,

as well as the ground being very uneven in the bay and tricky to park in.

 

I took the old advice of ignoring this charge as the car park was not full when my car was there

and it was not really obstructing another bay and i therefore considered the charge unreasonable.

 

 

I was passed through the usual debt recovery agencies (Zenith etc..) and the amount owed fluctuated until about October last year when everything went silent.

 

 

About 3 weeks ago now i have received a new letter from BW Legal stating that the debt has been passed to them

and the amount is now £154 including £54 costs.

 

 

I have continued to ignore but they have somehow now got a hold of my mobile number and keep calling me

- i have yet to speak to them though.

 

Obviously it is too late to appeal the charge through the usual avenues but i just wonder what the best course of action is now,

i still think the £154 is incredibly disproportionate for what actually occurred

and so i do not wish to pay it,

however it is a bit of a nuisance having these people chasing me.

 

Any advice welcomed!

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

safe to ignore still

unless/until a claimform arrives

and we've not seen any for these historic speculative invoices thru BW

its just willy waving

hoping people will panic and pay

in this instance

they are solely a DCA

and not solicitors

though they have NO LEGAL POWERS anyway

as with any DCA.

THEY ARE NOT BAILIFFS

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

BW are acting as an dca so ignore them.

Any claim Excel make will have to have to have some substance

and this wouldnt be enough to show a cause of action.

 

You can put their number on a barred list or better still,

answer without saying anything and let them waste their money.

 

 

Dont hang up until well after they have,

it will block their line.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for your response! I will continue to ignore

 

Do not ignore real court papers though...

 

In your case they would have to rely on keeper liability under Schedule 4 of the POFA 2012,

which Excel do not claim to use.

But it seems that does not bother BW Legal;

 

http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2016/05/bw-legalgo-legal.html

 

Do not speak to BW Legal on the phone - block the number.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply,

 

No i will not of course ignore real court papers, if it comes to that then i will have to work out what to do next.

 

I have blocked their number on my phone as advised,

 

Many thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi guys,

 

today i have received another letter from BW Legal entitled Final Notice.

It states that further to the previous letter where payment was advised it has still not been received.

 

 

It then states: "Excel now requires full payment of the balance within 10 days from the date of this letter (19/05/2016),

failing which Excel has instructed us to commence County Court proceedings against you for recovery of the balance.

 

 

For the avoidance of doubt the balance relates to the £100.00 parking charge

and the £54 for Excel's initial legal fees, which were detailed in the car park terms and conditions."

 

It then goes on to outline the events of county court proceedings etc and also references PE vs Beavis

 

Should this be treated as a letter before action? Or should it still be ignored?

 

If court claim papers do arrive, is the amount escalated?

Or would the amount still be £154 on the claim papers?

 

Do i need to start fighting this at all now?

Up until now i have given absolutely no response or acknowledgement to anybody.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a lba, just another threatogram dressed up a bit.

 

 

The detail about £54 legal fees- utter cobblers as they are claiming for a breach of contrac

t so how can you also agree to pay something not part of that contract.

BW just add that amount for themselves.

 

I would respond to BW and say that there was no breach of contract at the time

and that any claim will be vigourously defended as being vexatious and a full costs order sought.

 

they will then know that you are not shy,

just treating them witht he contempt they deserve.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply,

I have never responded to something like this in a formal fashion so how do i go about it?

 

 

Do i email or post?

 

 

And how exactly do i word it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

type in excel BW

in the search CAG of the top red toolbar

lots of examples to the letter

if you go read a few like threads.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay thank you i will do that today.

 

 

Do i need to make any reference to the fact that the driver has not been identified?

or is that irrelevant now that they are pursuing me as the registered keeper?

 

Also i have been reviewing the original NTK again.

It does not state a period of parking, only a date and a contravention time.

Is this enough to count as a breach of the PoFA and thus render the NTK useless?

 

Edit ^^ The NTK specifies a time,

but then goes on to say

"The period of parking to which this notice relates is the period immediately preceding the contravention time referred to above"

- Is this enough to satisfy PoFA?

 

Would it be easier to upload a redacted copy of front and back to check compliance?

 

Thanks once again

Link to post
Share on other sites

all too late to worry about,

 

keep it in mind though if they are dumb enough to want to try their luck at court.

 

As already said, they dont rely on PoFA so unless you intend making a complaint about them getting your details by fraud to the DVLA

it will mean little as they cant now claim it for their causus belli.

 

Fire off the osd off letter to BW and I suspect that will be the end of the matter.

 

keep that to the one line I suggested so you dont drop yourself in it my mentioning irrelevant things

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for the guidance, posted first class today:

 

To whom it may concern,

 

There was no such breach of contract at the time and any claim will be vigorously defended as being vexatious and a full costs order sought.

 

Sincerely,

 

Thanks again guys

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Update: after sending the advised letter, i have now received a further letter entitled: Letter of claim, it reads as follows:

 

Further to our letter dated....

where we requested that you either pay the balance in full or provide your detailed grounds for disputing the PCN, by .....,

we are yet to receive payment and/or a response to our letter.

 

Please pay the Balance by ...... to prevent legal action from being taken

 

. For the avoidance of doubt the balance relates to the £xx parking charge and the £xx for our clients initial legal fees, which were detailed in the car park terms and conditions.

 

It then goes on to give a paragraph entitled: County Court Proceedings with a breakdown of costs totalling £245.36

 

The total amount that they want me to pay now has risen from £154 to £162.18

 

What does this mean and what should i do about it?

 

Redacted full letter can be scanned if necessary,

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

then respond by saying that there is no debt and any claim will be met with a counterclaim for harassment as your client knows fill well it has no cause for action.

 

All of the costs are made up and designed to scare you into paying more than any contractual amount that could be ordered.

 

BW will always say they are only acting on their clients instructions but they actually add these extra amounts on for themselves as basically a no win no fee contingency, which is unlawful (tort of maintenance)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your response ericsbrother, I shall do that.

 

Out of interest, if it goes to court is it possible that i could be asked directly if i was the driver? As that would surely put a large hole in my main defence.. seeing as the driver has never been identified

Link to post
Share on other sites

the law doesnt allow it,

you could decline anyway and cite possible incrimination and self-incrimination,

a topic that has stretched many a judge's mind.

 

 

The Road Traffic ACt has parts where when you are obliged to name the driver but this isnt one of those cases.

 

 

The PoFA offers protection if the company get things wrong they are just wrong

and cant go after anyone else nor ask you to identify the driver.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...