Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I spoke to a pro-bono entity this afternoon.  They advise I must initiate a claim in the court v the receiver if I want to then file an application for an order for sale.  I must have a claim/ proceedings to be able to force a sale. The judge in the current proceedings  has told me that I cannot force the lender to sell and the lender cannot interfere either.   If the receiver isn't acting correctly and isn't selling - this means I must make a claim against the receiver
    • Thanks Dave It's not too far away, about 8 or 9 miles, so I will probably venture over on my bike if I can't think of a good reason to drive there again! I'll have a chat with Mrs GB_Joe tomorrow and see which shops they visited, I know M&S was on the list (had to try on multiple sets of trousers!) and they are actually in that bit of retail park. The uniform shop is across the way in the Meridian Centre, so probably not helpful to get them involved.
    • As they have failed to deliver their original PCN you will need to send them an SAR where they should provide that PCN. It should show the address they used . If it is not your current one that would explain the non delivery. If it was correct then perhaps the Post office messed up. A more cynical view would be that UKPC didn't send it so that you couldn't claim the reduction. It appears that UKPC have been there for some time  but I have been unable to find any pictures of their Notices.The leisure park itself is pretty big so while some parts maybe give 5 hours free parking other parts may have restrictions like permits. I haven't been there for years -I went  to Nandos and the bowling centre . I am surprised that they are now infested with UKPC as the place is plenty big enough not to require their dubious services. If you live not to far away it would help if you could get some legible pictures of their signs. Be carful to park in an area that doesn't require a permit and take photos of the entrance signs, the five hour sign and the permit only sign as well as any other signs that are different from the previous signs. Also if their is a payment machine could you please photograph that.
    • This other entity doesn't know what's going on.  To be clear I had huge equity.  No-one would ever expect a lender to erode all my equity.  The question is - if anyone knows the legal answer - on the basis they have a charging order - could they make an application for an order for sale?  
    • Is this place near to you? I ask for two reasons. If you can easily go back, then get photos of the signs.  On GM and Parkopedia there are various comments about the signs being pants. Also go back to the school uniform shop and ask the manager there for contact details for the retail park (which I've Googled & Googled and got nowhere).  The school uniform shop will just be tenants of the retail park, they won't be able to do anything.  It will be the retail park that called EPC in, and we've seen loads of cases where the organ grinder has intervened and called off the monkey.  As for EPC, aye, ignore them until LoC stage.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Opened box product & full manufacturers warranty


irlgeez
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2904 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, I've purchased this product

https://www.scan.co.uk/products/audeze-el-8-closed-back-planar-magnetic-headphones-(open-box)

 

 

after receiving it one of the first things I found was that one of the drivers does not work

and there were scratches on the product.

 

I've contacted them straight away and they've told me that they want to replace the product with another opened box,

but I believe this will not be in accordance to the "full manufacturers warranty"

and a reasonable outcome would be a repaired product or a new replacement product.

 

I've written them a fairly big email explaining that there should be separation of concern regarding this and asked what would be the case if they simply didn't have any open boxes left in stock.

 

What is the right procedure for such an issue?

 

Thanks

 

EDIT: I've got a response:

 

Hi,

 

Under no legal document does it state you are entitled to a full retail product after purchasing a refurbished/open box product as a replacement.

 

 

you are bound to the product you purchased which is an opened box high b grade product.

This is clearly reflected on the price that you paid.

 

We have discussed this over the phone and there is no way we can process your request in getting a full retail product which worked out at 100+ pounds.

 

We have already offered to collect your item and replace from stock.

If we no longer have any open box products in stock we would be left with no choice but to refund the product in full.

 

Please follow up on my colleagues email to arrange the collection.

 

regards,

https://www.scan.co.uk/products/audeze-el-8-closed-back-planar-magnetic-headphones-(open-box)

Edited by Andyorch
Correct link added
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, I've purchased this product - scan.co.uk/products/audeze-el-8-closed-back-planar-magnetic-headphones-(open-box) - and after receiving it one of the first things I found was that one of the drivers does not work and there were scratches on the product.

 

I've contacted them straight away and they've told me that they want to replace the product with another opened box, but I believe this will not be in accordance to the "full manufacturers warranty" and a reasonable outcome would be a repaired product or a new replacement product.

 

I've written them a fairly big email explaining that there should be separation of concern regarding this and asked what would be the case if they simply didn't have any open boxes left in stock.

 

 

What is the right procedure for such an issue?

 

Thanks

 

EDIT: I've got a response:

 

 

 

 

https://www.scan.co.uk/products/audeze-el-8-closed-back-planar-magnetic-headphones-(open-box)

 

I think they are correct. You bought a discounted item which was in an opened box and they can replace with the same. If the replacement does not work properly, you can then claim a refund of what you have paid.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've asked for a legal document that states the opposite and I've got this:

 

Hi,

 

Yes you have paid for a product which should be in good condition and working order, which is why we have offered to collect your item and replace with another product from stock as mentioned earlier.

 

But mentioned earlier you will be replaced like for like. Under no circumstance you will not be replaced with an item that holds a higher value/quality rating as that is not what you paid for originally.

 

This is our only offer.

 

Regards,

 

Not sure if I'm stupid or they are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that if you bought an item which was described as – "open box" and was not described as being in new condition, and if you got a reduced price as a result, then I think you would have to expect to accept some blemishes.

 

On the other hand, you are entitled to have it in fully working condition. You say that one of the drivers was not working. I'm not too sure what you mean by this. Are you relating to the software?

 

Anyway, I think that they are quite right in expecting you to accept like-for-like. I'm sorry to say that I don't think you're entitled to expect a new replacement.

 

From the email which you have published here, it seems to me that they have reacted fairly promptly and correctly.

 

Because this contract was made after October 2015, and because you bought the fault to their notice within 30 days of having the item, you would be entitled to a full refund – but that means a full refund of the money you paid, not a full refund of the price of a brand-new one.

 

So I think the situation is that either you accept a refund of the money paid or you accept a replacement in working condition – and hopefully without the blemish – but that would be a matter of potluck

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that if you bought an item which was described as – "open box" and was not described as being in new condition, and if you got a reduced price as a result, then I think you would have to expect to accept some blemishes.

 

On the other hand, you are entitled to have it in fully working condition. You say that one of the drivers was not working. I'm not too sure what you mean by this. Are you relating to the software?

 

Anyway, I think that they are quite right in expecting you to accept like-for-like. I'm sorry to say that I don't think you're entitled to expect a new replacement.

 

From the email which you have published here, it seems to me that they have reacted fairly promptly and correctly.

 

Because this contract was made after October 2015, and because you bought the fault to their notice within 30 days of having the item, you would be entitled to a full refund – but that means a full refund of the money you paid, not a full refund of the price of a brand-new one.

 

So I think the situation is that either you accept a refund of the money paid or you accept a replacement in working condition – and hopefully without the blemish – but that would be a matter of potluck

 

Drivers will refer to some of the internal components of a headset I believe.

 

But the retailer are correct in saying that they'll replace the Open Box product for another Open Box product. I think you're being very unreasonable expecting them to replace it with a brand new sealed product that would have cost more. Why do you feel that you're entitled to this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Driver = headphone speaker.

 

I understood all and I do not expect to get a refund bigger than the amount I've paid, but the product states that it's covered by full manufacturers warranty - I interpret this as following the official manufacturer's warranty terms & conditions, which are pretty much this - audeze.zendesk.com/entries/21334962-How-long-is-my-Warranty-for-What-does-it-cover-

 

So, my concern is that this issue would have been treated differently if this was the last open box that they've sold. They would not have any other open boxes to replace with - they would follow the manufacturers warranty => repair or replacement product. And after asking them what would happen if that was the last open box they've told me that they were going to refund me, but in the same time they state a 6 month warranty on the product page, and "FULL manufacturers warranty" (which is 3 years) in the product description. What?

Edited by irlgeez
Link to post
Share on other sites

Driver = headphone speaker.

 

I understood all and I do not expect to get a refund bigger than the amount I've paid, but the product states that it's covered by full manufacturers warranty - I interpret this as following the official manufacturer's warranty terms & conditions, which are pretty much this - audeze.zendesk.com/entries/21334962-How-long-is-my-Warranty-for-What-does-it-cover-

 

So, my concern is that this issue would have been treated differently if this was the last open box that they've sold. They would not have any other open boxes to replace with - they would follow the manufacturers warranty => repair or replacement product. And after asking them what would happen if that was the last open box they've told me that they were going to refund me, but in the same time they state a 6 month warranty on the product page, and "FULL manufacturers warranty" (which is 3 years) in the product description. What?

 

That is always a choice. I.e go back to retailer using consumer rights or approach the manufacturers to claim under the warranty.

 

You don't seem to want to deal with the retailer on the basis of getting another open box replacement and therefore you might choose the manfacturers warranty route.

 

I doubt for this type of product that the retailer is going to organise a repair.

 

I had a similar situation years ago and it would seem a shop had lots of opened boxes, because the product was getting a lot of returns for different faults. So i asked for the replacement to be tested and confirmed as in full working order. Thankfully it was.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately they are the official distributor for the UK.

I wonder if it's worth contacting Audeze directly so they could hopefully authorize Scan to do a repair/replacement.

Or I could ask for an open box replacement that could be tested before they ship it out, but then I do not know if the product has 6 months of warranty instead of 36...

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could contact the manufacturers about this situation and decide what to do.

 

Some online companies are not proper retail outlets as you might think. They may just be a big warehouse operation, where these open box products are not tested before sale. They buy the products in a large quantity for a fraction of their retail price and they don't want to get involved in repairs. They take products back from customers and may try to resell them, if at first glance they don't see anything wrong with them. I doubt they are properly tested before being sold.

 

Ask about the warranty situation.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

thye buy all of the returns from catalogues and stores like Argos so when someone sends something back it may be because it was faulty rather than they didnt want it. This means that you get an untested item which they should replace. Cosmetic damage is acceptable and if you dont want a replacement then you should have insisted on a refund. Manufacturers warranty nothing to do with anything, they sold it and they are responsible. Now you have to be clear that you want a working replacement or your money back, you cant be demanding something you have no rights to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...