Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

NZ Citizen, Living in UK - Credit Corp Debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2635 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good Evening Guys,

 

I've posted here previously and received some fantastic help so I am hoping the same can be done again.

 

My partner has got herself into an interesting situation.

She is an NZ citizen who lived in Australia for three years (where we met), before moving to Scotland with me when my Australian VISA expired - 12/14.

 

 

When she left Australia, she left behind approx. $1500 worth of debt split between a credit card and a mobile contract.

At the time we didn't have the finances to worry about it as the move to Scotland was priority.

 

Since 12/14 she has had no communication from the credit card company,

and only one email from the mobile provider asking/seeking payment which was early last year.

 

 

However today we received a message from a family friend of ours in Australia advising that they had been contacted by a company looking to speak with my partner,

they claimed they needed to speak with her or her family about a personal matter

and wouldn't give any other details (apart from her fathers first name - which was weird).

 

 

From checking the forums and contact number I now understand this to be Credit Corp.

 

My questions to you brilliant people is

- they clearly have limited info on her whereabouts,

should we make contact with them and try and rectify the debt, or let it go away?

 

 

Her main concern is that she is on a 5 year VISA here in the UK,

after which she will apply for residency and we're not sure if that would affect it.

 

 

Can they pursue it in the UK?

 

I've read some of the previous threads on here however her case is a bit specific

and I'm looking for a clear answer.

 

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated. I

 

 

'm off to bed now (23:20, 3/5/16) however will be available to answer any questions tomorrow morning.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok its debt avoidance in 'a' form

but my personal view is stuff 'em...

 

 

prob find most of the debts are interest and penalty charges

or exit fees or resulting contract monthlies that in all truth are not owed anyway.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should not affect any UK visa. UK credit records only relate to the UK. I guess that they only look at how well she us managing to live in the UK.

 

I suspect that they have no clue where she is resident. For such a small debt, i would think it is not worth any debt collector like Credit Corp pursuing this outside of Australia. If the credit card terms allow any debt to be enforced outside of Australia, then a UK court would look at the debt. But i doubt any UK Solicitors would want to handle such a small debt, as it would not be worth it.

 

Tell the family friends that if Credit Corp call again that the person they are seeking is a Kiwi and is not a resident of Australia. That they do not currently have any way of contacting her. Credit Corp should stop phoning.

 

The debts will become statute barred under relevant limitations law at some point. Credit Corp appear to have a reputation of being an unprofessional bunch, who will even try to annoy third parties, to see if they can gain contact from a debtor. They will have checked public records to try to trace, which is probably why they knew her Fathers first name. Once the trail runs dry they will give up.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

A UK credit reference check can be undertaken in the UK but ... The company making the request must have a registered address in the UK. For example ... HSBC Philippines can ask HSBC in the UK to credit check. Confirmed by the ICO

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys - apologies for the delayed response. Thank you so much for your help - unclebulgaria67 she is managing fine in the UK, near perfect score so I am happy that if we just let it lie and make no formal contact we should be OK. From reading some other forums on here today I understand Credit Corp's reputation for harassment.

 

Once again guys thanks for putting my mind at ease.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

you need to start a new thread

of your own please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...