Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I wouldn’t want to live under a repressive government that had a centrally controlled economy and actively suppressed dissent. Yet such an economy could bring massive resources (financial and manpower) into play.   Coronavirus: How can China build a hospital so quickly? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-51245156   It isn’t just that it is being built so quickly, but also that it is being built with infection control in mind, and means other healthcare facilities can transfer suspected cases there, retaining their capacity to treat non-respiratory illness patients.
    • I cannot see how they can issue a Court claim, if they have not issued a default notice.   You might owe a debt, but if the terms of the account require the Bank to take certain actions before they could enforce the debt in a Court, then I would suggest you study the account terms/conditions very carefully.  If you can become expert in understanding the account terms, this might come in handy, if you ever did have to defend a Court claim.
    • The key determinant to UB’s scenario is : at what point in relation to when they develop symptoms are those people infectious.   Chickenpox, for example, is infectious (by airborne droplet spread) 2 days before the rash appears. So, the patient might feel a “bit unwell / virally ill” without any specific signs, and not have sufficient symptoms / signs to allow action to be taken.   There isn’t enough data (yet!) to know when 2019-nCoV becomes infectious.   https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/about/transmission.html   “Best guess” is when they start having symptoms of coughing and sneezing, at least that will be peak infectivity.   If they are soon to become symptomatic, how infectious is a single cough or sneeze? Nobody yet knows. Edit: hot off the press: China coronavirus 'spreads before symptoms show' https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-51254523   As for “Do the Government/NHS have sufficient contingency measures in place to deal with any such crisis ?“   The Agency leading (at least for England, each of the other 3 nations of the UK has a similar body) is Public Health England. It isn’t part of the NHS per se, (but works with the NHS). It is “government”, but quasi-autonomous.  It describes itself as “We are an executive agency of the Department of Health and Social Care, and a distinct organisation with operational autonomy”.   PHE has issued guidance, both for primary care and secondary care, for (amongst other things): a) who gets tested, b) case management, and c) infection prevention measures.   Whilst more information specific to 2019-nCoV is being learnt, these are pretty much based on what we know from SARS and MERS, but I’d expect them to get “fine-tuned” as we know more.   So, there are plans.   2 factors spring to mind immediately, though.   A) Can the plans be fully implemented? Hospitals are already facing bed pressures. If demand for resources (such as FFP3 masks) soars: will supplies match demand? (Both for “total number of units available overall, over the total period of demand”, but equally importantly  “supplies deliverable on demand: what would be the equivalent of ‘cashflow’ for a bank“)   B) Availability of testing. With a small number of cases meeting the case definition, each can be tested. If 2019-nCoV becomes widespread, will the availability of testing match demand? What will the turnaround time for testing be?   Will testing matter if it becomes widespread? At the moment, there is widespread availability of testing for Flu and the most common respiratory viruses. This is useful so that they can prioritise the isolation of Flu A patients in hospital, and offer them treatment for FluA, and Mrs Bloggs who looks like they might have flu, but actually has picornavirus on a background of chronic bronchitis doesn’t get isolated and doesn’t get flu treatment once her results are back.   Will testing matter as much for 2019-nCoV? Not for treatment (as there is no specific antiviral at the moment). How about for decision on isolation? That’ll depend on how many cases there are (there may not be enough side rooms), and if testing supply can match demand.   (not quite “worst case” but “not great case”) scenario is : A) Hospital wards: not enough side rooms. “Cohort nursing” in bays (or even “cohort wards”), so Mrs Bloggs with her rhinovirus and chronic bronchitis gets put in the bed next door to Mrs Bull who has 2019-nCoV (or, even: next door to Mr Bull, if things get bad enough the ‘same sex’ rules get suspended). B) Split Emergency Departments. Non “?flu, ?2019-nCoV” go to one side, those with compatible respiratory symptoms go to another waiting area. All the respiratory symptom patients lumped in, waiting, together. I’d expect once people realised where they would be waiting they would only go if they really had no other choice ...... On the plus side, much was learnt from the SARS outbreak, so they are better informed than when they first faced SARS
    • You don't get a good deal from the USA, look at all the tech we gave them during and after World War II, then they tried to stop us using the tech we invented and provided to them.
    • Millions (literally) of people commit speeding offences every year. If every one of them lost their job as a result those millions would be unemployed. I know of few jobs where a single speeding conviction would result in dismissal.   Should you be unfortunate enough to be in this position again simply follow the process as laid out in the paperwork. Don't get smart and start prattling on about your (mistaken) rights under GDPR or whatever. As you have seen, by the time you've established your rights correctly you will face a court hearing. You can ask for "photographs to help identify the driver" before you return your driver nomination form (though that does not stop the 28 day clock measuring the period in which you have to respond). Don't ask for "evidence" as it may be taken that you are disputing the matter and out-of-court disposals (far and away the most favourable option) may not be offered. You have no entitlement to evidence unless the matter goes to court. Most forces will provide such photos (though they don't have to) by giving you a link to follow. They rarely help in identifying the driver because their purpose is to identify the vehicle. Identifying the driver is your responsibility and if you fail to do so without a valid defence you commit a more serious offence which carries a hefty fine, six points and an endorsement code that will see your insurance premiums rocket.
  • Our picks

reef2005

LPS excess charge notice at great western hospital, swindon car park

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1087 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi and thank you in advance for your help,

 

I need advice on the following parking issue:

 

I arrived at a hospital car park and after waiting along time in the queue I got in but found no space.

As my appointment was now past I could not wait any longer and decided to park the car in a non-designated space

but made sure there was no obstruction to car park traffic.

 

 

After my appointment (40min) I paid for my parking ticket (£1)

when i returned to the car i found an EXCESS CHARGE NOTICE attached to the wind screen.

 

 

The reason for the ticket is obstructive parking.

Clearly this was not the case as there was ample space for cars to pass from all sides.

I find the charge of £85 draconian and predatory.

 

 

I am thinking of ignoring it until it reaches the court stage where I can defend my case

as I feel that my circumstances (as a patient in a hospital) have not been taken into account

by the ticket issuer (LOCAL PARKING SECURITY LTD).

 

 

If the fee was going to the hospital funds it would be more than worth it

but am finding it difficult to accept to pay this large amount to a private parking predator.

 

Any advice would be much appreciated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG. I will move this thread for you to the correct forum.

 

Can you have a look at this and give the needed responses.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?462118-Have-you-received-a-Parking-Ticket-%281-Viewing%29-nbsp


If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thnks.

 

This is not an NTD ticket but EXCESS CHARGE NOTICE on the windscreen.

 

1 The date of infringement? 28/4/2016

 

2 Did you appeal to the parking company? NO

 

5 Who is the parking company? LOCAL SECURITY PARKING LTD

 

the rest of the questions are not relevant as the 28 day payment period is still applicable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest you do nothing and wait for the Notice to Keeper which should arrive between 29 and 56 days after the event. Never identify the driver. Always say 'The Driver'

 

Once you have the NTK, you can then appeal as the keeper if you want but as this is a relatively small company, they haven't taken anyone to court in the last two years.

 

The reason to appeal is so that they will reject you and then you can appeal to POLPLA. This costs them, not you and even if you lost that appeal, they would still have to take court action to get a penny out of you.

 

There is nothing stopping you complaining to the hospital. (be good to know which hospital this is) They may just instruct LPS to cancel the ticket.

 

If you are going anywhere near the hospital again, take some pictures of the signs. This helps us help you.


If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just one other question, was this a barrier controlled car park?


If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes it is. It's a hospital car park so you get in with a ticket and can't get out until you have paid. I stayed 40min and paid £1.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice. I will write to the hospital (great western hospital, swindon) and update the thread when they respond.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting! A barrier controls entry/exit yet they don't monitor how many cars enter or exit the car park. That is an inducement to fail! If the car park was full, the barrier should not have risen for you so I suggest you find out whether LPS or the hospital maintains the system as it seems not fit for purpose.

 

When you complain to the hospital, raise that.


If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I thought the same as there were several cars waiting for other cars to vacate their parking spaces.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

can you photograph the signage at the car park next time you are there, the claim is in law for a breach of the contractual conditions offered at the time so 2 can play at that game, you may well have the grounds for suing them for breach of contract for charging you to park and not providing a space to aprk in. The silly thing is there is no legal regulation for what is and isnt a parking space so if they dont agree that will undo their claim.

However, that is for the future, in the meanwhile complain to the hospital and wait for the NTK through the post. DO NOT contact the parking co until the NTK arrives as this creates a liability on your part that doesnt as yet exist.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
can you photograph the signage at the car park next time you are there, the claim is in law for a breach of the contractual conditions offered at the time so 2 can play at that game, you may well have the grounds for suing them for breach of contract for charging you to park and not providing a space to aprk in. The silly thing is there is no legal regulation for what is and isnt a parking space so if they dont agree that will undo their claim.

However, that is for the future, in the meanwhile complain to the hospital and wait for the NTK through the post. DO NOT contact the parking co until the NTK arrives as this creates a liability on your part that doesnt as yet exist.

 

Many thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While i was out of the country, the LPS passed my details to a debt recovery company (DRP) who sent me a letter DATED 19JUL claiming double the PCN charge i.e. £160.

I emailed the hospital complaining that the gate opened while there were no spaces in the car park but they directed me to contact LPS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK that's normal. Do not contact or enter any dialogue with the Debt Collector, they have no powers over you and can only send scary looking letters and do nothing else. The windscreen ticket is the NTD - Notice To Driver, you never respond to that, you only respond to the NTK - Notice To Keeper. The NTK response should have been made after you received the first NTK and you shoudl have received an appeal code for POPLA if this lot are POPLA members or IPC if they are members of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The hospital are passing the buck. They own the site (or lease it) and they are ultimately responsible for the car parking so I would suggest a formal complaint to the trust.

 

As this is a barrier controlled car park, some allow 30 minutes free parking where you just insert your ticket into the pay station and this validates the ticket so you can exit the car park. All well and good but if there are no spaces, you would still need to park and leave the vehicle to get the ticket validated. Even in that short a time you were at risk of getting a ticket.

 

Did you receive a NTK? If so, are you out of time to appeal? As for DR+, they are a pet debt collector who the parking industry use and they have zero influence over you not forgetting to mention the extra charges levied would never stand.

 

If you haven't appealed and you are still within the time, appeal as the keeper


If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The hospital reply (by email) was that there must have been spaces in the car park to let you in which is a point of evidence on their side and mine.

On my return to the car I found a ticket attached to the wind screen - EXCESS CHARGE NOTICE. The only other contact was a recent letter from the debt recovery company.

I did not appeal at the time as I wanted to see if the LPS gets in touch. They did not and then I was out of the country for a month.

The incident happened 3 months ago.

 

It seems my only option is to ignore the DR+ letters unless they opt for the court in which case the control barrier issue might play in my favour.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well, LPS havent sent a NTK in time so no keeper liability. I hiope you didnt tell the hospital you were driving as they may well pass on this information to their lackeys, even though it is a breach of the DPA.

I would just wait and see what LPS decide to do, threatograms from the poodles at DR+ are nothing to concern you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

today, i received a letter from DRP with a title NOTICE OF INTENDED COURT ACTION. It says the follwoing:

 

"in light of the court ruling Beavis-v-ParkingEye Ltd we urge you to make contact with us without delay. if you are liable for this charge and do not pay by 17/8 we will pass your file to the creditor with a recommendation to commence court action against you."

 

has anyone heard of this court ruling and is it the right course of action to respond to them?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Yes, the Beavis case was hears at the Supreme Court where Parking Eye won the case. As was mentioned by the judges at the time, the judgement only applied to the once car park that PE managed.

 

Your case is different. PE's case was based on a free car park. yours is a pay on exit car park. The fact that there were no parking spaces available at the hospital says to me that the barrier systm is flawed. My local hospital is the same (except they don't use money grubbing companies) in that the barriers let anyone in irrespective of whether there are any parking spaces available and the exit is electronically controlled by a member of staff in the office who will raise the barrier as the driver couldn't find a parking space.

 

Personally, I would go back to this car park on a busy day and count how many cars there are in the car park in relation to how many spaces.

 

As to DRP, they cannot do anything. They can recommend I come and take your first born but that is all it is, a recommendation. they cannot force the issue.

 

The only time to be concerned is if a Letter Before Action/Claim or court documents turn up. Until that time, continue to ignore is what I would do.


If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the advice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Send an FOI to the Hospital Trust asking for the number of vehicles allowed to enter the barrier to the car park and the number of parking places available. It will make someone have to do some work and if they can't come up with an answer then use this in your evidence. While you're doing the FOI ask for the names and dates of the parking company contract and the terms and conditions that specify the parking company can take action on behalf of the Trust.

 

FOI's have a limited time for response so you should get this in enough time to use it, should LPS fancy their chances in court.

 

Go to the Hospital Trust website, there will be a link there for you to submit your FOI or an email address - if you don't get an answer complain to the PALs Dept and email the CEO directly, usually his.name@hospitaltrustname.nhs.uk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

many thanks for the suggestions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I work at the GWH and I received an excess charge notice 2 days ago in the staff car park! The hospital won't do anything about it as its a private company. Did you have any other comeback for ignoring it, and should I also just ignore it?

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

read a few dozen of the posts on this forum and then tell us what we will need to know to answer your questions. There is a simple box filling questionnaire pinned to the top of the section that if you fill out will help is start on things

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi, I work at the GWH and I received an excess charge notice 2 days ago in the staff car park! The hospital won't do anything about it as its a private company. Did you have any other comeback for ignoring it, and should I also just ignore it?

Thanks

 

You need to start a new thread of your own please, nb29. Welcome to CAG. :)

 

My best, HB


Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...