Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Do you think I should send the CCA request now then instead of waiting? I really can do without the stress. Any advice would be appreciated. Thank you for responding.
    • How was the "receiver" appointed and what is their role? Appointed by the lender under the terms of their security on the loan (sometimes referred to as "LPA Receiver")? Or are they acting for you in insolveny? What's the current role of the agent?
    • Wait for more replies, but that letter to me can be interpreted as a letter before action. Ignoring it can have consequences. The court to impose sanctions for failure in responding to a letter of claim.
    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Property Purchase -Solictors communications with the Estate agent.


toys19
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2879 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A recent house purchase left me very surprised when I discovered that our conveyancing solicitor was freely giving info about the progress of the sale to the vendors estate agent, including our mortgage status etc. I wondered if any Caggers could let me know what the legal staus of this is?

 

Does the estate agent have any right to our information?

Should the solicitor be freely giving information to the agent?

Shouldn't the solicitor just stick to discussing things with the vendors solicitor?

Link to post
Share on other sites

A recent house purchase left me very surprised when I discovered that our conveyancing solicitor was freely giving info about the progress of the sale to the vendors estate agent, including our mortgage status etc. I wondered if any Caggers could let me know what the legal staus of this is?

 

Does the estate agent have any right to our information?

Should the solicitor be freely giving information to the agent?

Shouldn't the solicitor just stick to discussing things with the vendors solicitor?

 

What harm / loss have you suffered?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing other than a perceived invasion of privacy. I don't understand your point? Why do you need to know this?

I just wondered if the estate agent has any right to be involved in the process once solicitors details have been exchanged.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will probably find that the estate agent is probably trying to keep everyone in the loop. Also they are probably checking on the progress of your mortgage etc so to try and keep the seller's solicitors in the loop. This happens on every sale/purchase with an estate agent. I cannot see any invasion of privacy. The estate agents are doing their job and for the fees they pay which is sometimes a lot more than the solicitor's fees I think the estate agents should be kept on their toes and be more involved. They also need to know when exchange is and more importantly completion day so keys can be released to the purchaser.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing other than a perceived invasion of privacy. I don't understand your point? Why do you need to know this?

I just wondered if the estate agent has any right to be involved in the process once solicitors details have been exchanged.

 

Why do I need to know this?

Because you have additional ways to pursue this if you have suffered harm.

 

Mind you, you don't have to answer, but if you don't, or answer with "why do you need to know this" : you'll put people off answering.

Good luck: I'm out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ahh I understand now, please accept my apologies, it did seem brusque. In person I would have knotted my eyebrows and asked and I am sure it would have been much more disarming.

I am not seeking remedy against the agent or solicitor. I just wondered if there was any duty of confidentiality or if there are rights to the know about the transaction for any interested party.

My experience with estate agents is that they cannot be trusted, and I don't feel comfortable with them knowing my financial position. Which in this case is what happened, earnings, amount of deposit funds available etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Solicitors owe their clients a strict duty of confidentiality and shouldn't disclose things without their client's consent (https://www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/handbook/code/part2/rule4/content.page).

 

I think a solicitor instructed to complete a house purchase would have implied consent to speak with estate agents and other involved parties to progress the purchase.

 

It isn't clear to me why the solicitor disclosed financial details to the estate agent. There may have been a good reason but I can't think of one. You can complain to the solicitor and then to the Legal Ombudsman if you aren't happy.

  • Confused 1

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much for your reply. The SRA link and your advice are very useful.

I don't think I would be able to prove anything anyway, so I feel making a complaint would be pointless.

I'm more interested in understanding how to ask any future conveyancing solicitor to be a bit more circumspect about what they tell the estate agent.

I am not really convinced, that once the buyer and vendors solicitors are talking to each other, that the estate agent has any further valuable contribution to make. Other than being informed at the end that the process is complete and that they should hand over the keys.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On some occasions it can be useful to keep the EA close and in the loop as they have direct contact and the ear of your purchaser...in a way that your Solicitor does not have...(Solicitor to solicitor)

 

Andy

  • Confused 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have yet to have experience as a vendor, so I value yours, and will remember that in the future.

However in my case as a purchaser of 6 properties I have found EA's to be a royal pain.

Edit - actually I should say on my first purchase the EA was brilliant, transparent and very useful. He did work to get the best price for the client, but there was nothing untoward.

Edited by toys19
update
Link to post
Share on other sites

You are probably right that a complaint might not go anywhere.

 

On future transactions, you can specifically instruct the solicitor/conveyancer that you do not want financial information disclosed without your express consent. You will then have a very clear basis for complaining to the regulator if the solicitor/conveyancer does not follow your instructions.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I ask, what info was passed on?

 

If it was " yes they have a mortgage and just waiting for the paperwork" I can't see what the problem is. If it was something like, "they have defaults and are on a low wage" then that's a different thing entirely.

 

Sellers pay a fortune to EAs and its their job to liaise between all parties and find out if the purchaser can afford the house.. Sellers are entitled to know how the sale is progressing and solicitors known this. The question is whether the solicitor passed the fine like be between assisting the purchase and breaching confidentiality.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sellers pay a fortune to EAs and its their job to liaise between all parties and find out if the purchaser can afford the house..

I do think estate agents overstep the bounds at times and I can therefore understand the OP's irritation. They'll claim they need all sorts of details because of money laundering regs and I've refused point blank to provide them in the past because the EA plays no part in the transfer of money. It didn't impede the sale. My solicitor is entitled to know where the funds come from and I'd be pretty annoyed if they discussed this with anyone who didn't need to know.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I ask, what info was passed on?

 

If it was " yes they have a mortgage and just waiting for the paperwork" I can't see what the problem is. If it was something like, "they have defaults and are on a low wage" then that's a different thing entirely.

Well as I said the estate agent now knows our wage, contents of bank account etc. Too much.

Sellers pay a fortune to EAs and its their job to liaise between all parties and find out if the purchaser can afford the house.. Sellers are entitled to know how the sale is progressing and solicitors known this. The question is whether the solicitor passed the fine like be between assisting the purchase and breaching confidentiality.

Which the vendor can find out from their solicitor. The EA needs to know very little once solicitors details have been exchanged.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which the vendor can find out from their solicitor. The EA needs to know very little once solicitors details have been exchanged.

In my opinion of course...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which the vendor can find out from their solicitor. The EA needs to know very little once solicitors details have been exchanged.

 

In my limited experience of two sales recently, the agents have produced more information than the lawyers. In our case, they have been the main source of information.

 

I agree with you about the financial information though, I wouldn't be happy about that. As goodatresearch said, I would expect it to be generic.

 

HB

Edited by honeybee13
Repetition.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's really what I meant. Put it this way, I sold a house last year and the buyers dragged their feet. I didn't want sensitive financial info, just wanted to know at what the stage they were at. My solicitor just got " it takes as long as it takes" from the buyers solicitor. In the mean time we were losing out on potential interested parties. I told my EA that I wanted an update that day or they were to start remarketing the property and I would leave their offer on the table. Is it worth losing a house you really want because you don't want the seller to know at what stage your at.

 

 

 

Which the vendor can find out from their solicitor. The EA needs to know very little once solicitors details have been exchanged.

 

In my limited experience of two sales recently, the agents have produced more information than the lawyers. In our case, they have been the main source of information.

 

I agree with you about the financial information though, I wouldn't be happy about that. As goodatresearch said, I would expect it to be generic information.

 

HB

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Interesting thread here that covers the same from an agents point of view, although the last post appears to be from a solictor who I think appears to feel the same way I do..

http://www.propertyindustryeye.com/forums/topic/solicitors-dont-you-just-love-them/#post-28610

 

First of all the whinge: employees of agents ringing us wanting to know when their employer’s fee will be paid (so they know when they will get their commission) ie for reasons nothing to do with “keeping the chain informed” and all to do with being paid.

 

There is an ethical issue which Estate Agents either appreciate but wish to ignore or do not appreciate at all.

 

Who is the Solicitor’s client? We are prohibited from discussing our client’s affairs with anyone other than the client unless we have clear instructions from the client (signed, in writing) indicating we can discuss their case with a named third party.

Edited by honeybee13
Cutting down quote from original text.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...