Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Doc 04-19-2024 11-01-51-merged-compressed.pdf good morning.    9 pages attached.    thank you  UCM
    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
    • Thanks for the reply dubai 50 - if the statute is 10 years it has long passed - if it is 15 years i havea few months left. i shall ignore until it gets serious  An update - - I sent the letter to the bank in Dubai ( I did get delivery confirmation from Royal Mail)   - I have moved to a new address ( this is the address i gave to the bank in dubai)  - IDR are continuing to send Letters to the old address, which leads me to believe they are not in contact with the bank at all. - i have not replied to any correspondence digital or hard as they are non threatening ( as of yet).        
    • Your topic title was altered last June 23 by the owner of this forum in the interests of the forum Anyway well done on your result and thank you for concluding your topic, title updated.   Andy   .
    • So what    Why ? Consent Order/ Confidentiality ? This would be be invaluable to followers of your topic.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council tax bailiff clamped and took a car on Monday


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2919 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good morning All,

 

Birmingham city council bailiff came to my door on Monday morning after clamping a car outside. AS of the end of March this year I owe £35 council tax balance from last year and have not even received the bill the new financial year yet. I pay my council tax on monthly basis by internet transfer. I have had contact with Equitax for a few years now and have spoken to them on number of occasions and explained that I really don’t owe the council anything. They usually stop contacting me for months and then start again.

 

Basically, the bailiff said that the count was handed over to them ones in 2014 and 2015 and that I should have being paying them and not the council so now he want over £700 in their charges.

 

I have lived in this house since 2000 and have always paid my council tax be it with some straggle but I do pay it, so I don't understand how the council can hand my account over to equitax when I have being paying.

 

I went to the citizen advice service yesterday and they told me to write a complaint to the council. I have also read few forums posts to figure out what to do but I am at lost at the moment. I'll be calling the council this morning to try to find out how this happened.

 

Any advice will be much appreciated.

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to ask the council for details of liability orders and what tax they think is still owed.

 

The council should only instruct Enforcement agents ( were called bailiffs), if they think there are outstanding lliability orders, you have not been paying.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good morning All,

 

Birmingham city council bailiff came to my door on Monday morning after clamping a car outside. AS of the end of March this year I owe £35 council tax balance from last year and have not even received the bill the new financial year yet. I pay my council tax on monthly basis by internet transfer. I have had contact with Equitax for a few years now and have spoken to them on number of occasions and explained that I really don’t owe the council anything. They usually stop contacting me for months and then start again.

 

Basically, the bailiff said that the count was handed over to them ones in 2014 and 2015 and that I should have being paying them and not the council so now he want over £700 in their charges.

 

From what you have written I suspect that accounts for arrears of council tax were passed to Equita to enforce, and instead of paying the enforcement company, you instead have been making payments direct to Birmingham City Council.

 

If this is the case then Birmingham council would have deducted the Compliance fee of £75 from each account and split the balance on a pro rata basis in line with legislation. The bottom line being that you have not cleared your debt to the council at all.

 

Can you please call the council and ask them to confirm the amount of each account that had been sent to Equita and the date that the accounts were forwarded.

 

You say that your car was clamped and has been removed.

 

How much was the car worth?

 

Is the car on finance?

 

What fees have bee charged by Equita?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have now spoken to the council and this is the situation. In May 2015 I received an arrears reminder from the council of £192.67. As of then I have not received my statement for that year so I have not paid for April and May. I immediately made this payment in May and another payment in June of £120.00, not knowing exactly what I owed, I calculated based on what I have paid in the previous year.

 

They said again in June they sent another arrears reminder of £264.00. I didn’t do anything about that and carried on paying the £120 every month. In September they handed the account over to equita. Equita wrote to me and I called them and explained that I have being paying my council tax so they need to check their records with the council.

 

It appears the exact same pattern was repeated from the year in 2014. This year 2016, I still have not received my bill for this year yet and my account is £25 in arrears and that is why the bailiff cam asking for £755 which will increase now that they have taken the car.

 

The bailiff said the car is worth £1400 but they might only get £400 for it in auction and it is not on finance.

 

Equita is charging £235 each for both cases plus the cost of the clumping the car and taking it away.

 

 

I think it’s completely unfair for the council to seek a liability order for an account that is in regular payment. What are my options now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to be honest here by saying that this case is very confusing indeed and I am at a loss to understand the reason for a debt of £25 and even more confused that such a small debt can now have reached £755. Please ask the council for an explanation.

 

What you needed to ask the council was the amount of each Liability Order and when these were passed to Equita.

 

For the avoidance of doubt, if the enforcement agent is enforcing more than one account at the same time he may only charge ONE enforcement fee of £235

 

It

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't forget that BCC is infested by Capita so Arnye has probably never spoken to or dealt with an actual BCC employee.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like Equita are over charging, so nothing has changed

This is the second post today, where they have allegedly charged the £235 more than once

As Ba has said only allowed to charge £235 once.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like Equita are over charging, so nothing has changed

This is the second post today, where they have allegedly charged the £235 more than once

As Ba has said only allowed to charge £235 once.

 

 

I have been charged 3 times £235 for 2 bills so will look into that

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been charged 3 times £235 for 2 bills so will look into that

BCC are infested by Capita, so you have never probably spoken to an actual BCC employee, Capita own Equita, see where this is going?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Appears to be a common trait by Equita. Notice of Enforcement delivered by hand giving only a couple of days notice, followed quickly by an Enforcement Visit and seemingly using multiple Enforcement hoping the debtor doesn't notice. Very similar to what they used to do previously over their "potential fees". Seems to me they think the TCGR do not apply to them. About time their licence to enforce was removed until such time they train their employees properly - better still remove all their Bailiffs certificates until such time each can prove they know what they are doing. A note should also be circularised via trade papers informing each "client" of their nefarious practices.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree PT, looks like they are trying to go back to the halcyon days of yore where they shamelessly indulged in "Upfront Fee Fraud"

 

Arnye should challenge the "Extra" £235s. In this case it should be the subject of a Formal Complaint to CEO, Elected Leader, and MP. Capita and Equita are corrosive to the public good, and need to be reigned in, even to the removal of certificates suggested by PT.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have now spoken to the council and this is the situation. In May 2015 I received an arrears reminder from the council of £192.67. As of then I have not received my statement for that year so I have not paid for April and May. I immediately made this payment in May and another payment in June of £120.00, not knowing exactly what I owed, I calculated based on what I have paid in the previous year.

 

They said again in June they sent another arrears reminder of £264.00. I didn't do anything about that and carried on paying the £120 every month. In September they handed the account over to equita. Equita wrote to me and I called them and explained that I have being paying my council tax so they need to check their records with the council.

 

It appears the exact same pattern was repeated from the year in 2014. This year 2016, I still have not received my bill for this year yet and my account is £25 in arrears and that is why the bailiff cam asking for £755 which will increase now that they have taken the car.

 

Equita is charging £235 each for both cases plus the cost of the clumping the car and taking it away.

 

I am sorry to say but I am none the wiser after reading your reply and you really must find out the following from the council:

 

What date were Liability Orders issued.

 

What period are they for.

 

What was the amount outstanding under each Liability Order when they were passed to Equita to enforce.

 

What date were they passed over to Equita and lastly

 

The exact amount of fees charged for EACH account and the date that the fees had been charged.

 

Unless the above is obtained it will be difficult to unravel this situation.

 

PS: There is a possibility that Equita may have charged 'multiple' fees of £235 but we cannot know for certain until we have the above information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am working today and won't be home till later tonight so I'll update you now and try to answer some of you questions.

 

I am unsure of when the liability orders were issued. the council officer told me yesterday that it was passed onto equita in September 2014 and again in September 2015 the amount outstanding at the time was about £800 or £900 each.

 

The fees according to the bailiff are £235 for each order plus another £75 each and the cost of the clamping and car and taking it away, which I don't know yet.

 

After being on to phone to the council for about an hour yesterday, the officer told me she will contact equita and speak to them about the car. she has no authority to cancel the orders, I must make a formal complain to their back office (didn't know what that meant). She gave an email and a postal address to write to.

 

She also said I need to contact the bailiff to negotiate for the release of the car. Since yesterday we've call the bailiff's number several times. Cannot even leave a message because his inbox is full and he is not answering the phone. On Monday Equita will not speak to me because, they said I can only negotiate with the bailiff at this stage.

 

I don't know what to do to get the car back, have to take 3 buses to get my son to school and I need to leave work now to start the pick up journey.

 

Thank you All

 

I did the formal complain yesterday and sent it via email. I have an acknowledgement response saying they have already began investigations and will get back t me in how many days (i con't remember at the moment).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Multiple £75, and multiple £235 charged on same visit.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes BN

 

Equita have not change and think themselves above the Law,

why because if we complain to the correct bodies it will be ignored and us out of pocket.

 

I thought the most of the new regs were better than before as you have a clear insight as to what can be charged.

 

At the end of the day this is trying to obtain Money by deception, or Fraud

 

If it can be proved this is what has happened, they should have the book thrown at them.

not just accept it was a mistake.

 

As we all know the latter will be the result.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Leakie, unfortunately Capita regard themselves as part of the Establishment, so are untouchable. There is an ongoing issue in BCC with their Crapita infestation, so Arnye should get their MP and Council Elected Leader involved as they should be aware of the fraudulent actions of their Contractor.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry BA

the OP has stated several times Equita have charged Multiple £235 charges

 

There is a lot of confusion about 'multiple' charging and accordingly, I started a new thread on the subject this morning. The OP needs to have a read to ascertain whether or not 'multiple fees' have been charged.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?463622-Can-enforcement-agents-charge-multiple-bailiff-fees-(7-Viewing)-nbsp

Link to post
Share on other sites

Arnye, everything else aside, every day that passes the pound where they have taken the car to will add charges on top. When this has happened to me at the beginning of the month, I was told that I would have to pay £48 per each day that the car has been in the pound. The bailiff letter only said that I will be liable to pay extra charges for the car being held at a secure location, but they never said how much that would be. By the time my Out of Time declaration had been rejected, 15 days had passed. Time is of essence now, if you are considering taking the car back. In my case, it was no longer worth it, so I said 'good riddance'. You need to ask the bailiff company where the car was taken to, they will want you to pay what they say you owe them, then they will pass you onto their fellow in crime, the pound, so they can skin you alive yet again. I am afraid you will find you have to agree to get raped twice. So act fast. Or let them keep the car and move on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have ten minutes to edit a post, and if you wish to delete it, there is an option via the Edit Post button. After the ten minute window has expired, you would need to report the post to the site team using the little triangle to the left of the Edit Post button.

 

If you want to subscribe to a thread, at the top of the page, you should see a Thread Tools button. Click on this to bring up a drop-down menu and then select "Subscribe to this thread...".

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have ten minutes to edit a post, and if you wish to delete it, there is an option via the Edit Post button. After the ten minute window has expired, you would need to report the post to the site team using the little triangle to the left of the Edit Post button.

 

If you want to subscribe to a thread, at the top of the page, you should see a Thread Tools button. Click on this to bring up a drop-down menu and then select "Subscribe to this thread...".

 

Can I PLEASE ask a favour?

 

Can you look towards extending the 'edit' facility to perhaps one hour. That would really assist new and regular posters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...