Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

ppi from J D Williams


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2436 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HI a friend of mine is trying to claim PPI from JD Williams (N Brown Group plc).

 

That received this back from them , I have never come across this.

 

 

You contacted

on 14th March 2016 in connection with the payment protection cover associated with your catalogue account.

 

You are a customer of J D Williams, which offers mail order goods and services for sale via a catalogue and other distance selling methods. The credit account has been open since 4th August 2002. Our records show that you opted to take out our Personal Account Protection (PAP formerly known as Peace of Mind Plan) on 20th November 2003 some 1 year 3 months after the account was opened. Please note, PAP is charged via a monthly premium.

 

It should be noted that prior to 2005 the sale of PPI was not regulated by the financial services authority (FSA now FCA) and JD Williams were not a member of the General Insurance Standards Council and therefore this complaint is not covered by the DISP complaint handling rules, nor does it fall under the jurisdiction of the Financial Ombudsman Service.

 

We have as part of the review considered whether you were eligible for payment protection insurance and find no evidence held here nor detailed in your initial complaint which indicates that you were not eligible for this insurance. If you have any supporting evidence that this is not the case then please contact me, to provide this, so that I may review my final decision.

 

You have received full insurance cover under PAP and you have received statements from us, which have shown the premium charges as a separate entry over the time you have operated your credit account with us. We do not consider that this policy was miss-sold and therefore, your allegations of miss-sale are refuted.

 

Please note the insurance was cancelled on 29th March 2016.

 

This will be our final response in this matter. If you are not satisfied with our response, you have the right to refer your complaint to The Financial Ombudsman Service, free of charge, but you must do so within 6 months of the date of this e-mail.

 

If you do not refer your complaint in time, the Ombudsman will not have our permission to consider your complaint and so will only be able to do so in very limited circumstances. For example, if the Ombudsman believes that the delay was a result of exceptional circumstances.

 

As previously stated we do not consider this sale to fall under the jurisdiction of the Financial Ombudsman Service as the sale took place prior to January 2005, however I have included their contact details below, in case you wish to verify this with them.

 

Financial Ombudsman Service

 

Exchange Tower

 

Harbour Exchange Square

 

London

 

E14 9GE

 

 

Any advise

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I've had the same reply for a few claims, issuing court claims was the only way I was going to get any refund, I did and was paid in full before my court due dates.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...