Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have received a PCN from Euro Car Parks for MFG - Esso Cobham - Gravesend. I was completely unaware that there was any such limit for parking and always considered this to be a service station. I stopped there to use the toilet, have a coffee and made a couple of work calls. I have read the previous topics on this location which suggest I can ignore this and ECP will not take legal action. The one possible complication is that the vehicle is leased by my employer so I do not want to involve them with the associated reminders and threatening letters. The PCN was first issued to the leasing company Arval who have notified ECP of the hiring company. I have attached a copy of the PCN Notice to Hirer with details removed as per instructions. What options do I have or should I just pay the PCN promptly at the reduced rate of £60? img20240424_23142631.pdf
    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HSBC managed loan & Help with Joint and Several agreement


Disco Dave
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2936 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys

Don't know if this is right area but, here we go.....

Firstly thanks for all the helpful posts £60,000 of unsecured debt in default and 6 years down the line a clean credit history......

 

A friend has an issue he needs advice over:-

 

Some time ago his limited company got into trouble.

He was supplying the banking sector and when the banks crashed his customer base disappeared overnight,

he mistakenly paid off his creditors leaving a overdraft of around £20,000.

 

The bank could see he was in trouble and asked for a second charge on his property

when his partner refused HSBC called him in and sold him a managed loan to pay off the overdraft.

 

He maintained payments till last year form his own pocket as the business wasn't trading in any way.

The current balance is around £4,000.

 

His new accountant looking at the situation suggested desolving the company and this was done,

at this time he wrote to the bank explaining the situation and notifying them of financial hardship,

since then all they have done is tried to bully him into payment.

 

He believes the original loan to have been mis-sold as affordability checks would have clearly shown

he had no income (after all this was why he had been called into his branch),

 

 

also the loan wasn't offered it was thrust at his as a no option situation.

We have been through the financial ombudsman route but because the company doesn't exists

as a legal entity they can look at this!!:mad2::mad2::mad2::mad2:

 

What everybody missed was a Joint and several agreement, that he doesn't recall signing let alone having explained.

 

This was signed by another Director and himself,

he doesn't know the whereabouts of the other director having fallen out several years ago.

 

The bank have now placed it to a debt collection agency

who are attempting recovery of this business debt under the terms of the joint and several agreement.

 

We have done a SAR and they do have the J&S

although HSBC have admitted that they can't at this time produce the original loan agreement.

 

My Questions....

 

1/ As this is a business debt, are they able to mark his personal credit file?

 

2/ it is my guess that the J&S although legal is a civil matter

and a court ruling (judgment) is required before his personal credit file can be marked?

 

3/ Is there any useable defence against the J&S?

 

4/ Being that he has personally re-paid 75% of this loan from personal funds

could he tell them to get the rest from the other director who signed the J&S?

 

5/ Can we use the lack of loan agreement to default HSBC

and stop recovery in the same way as we would for a CCA?

 

6/ Could any of his personal assets be at risk, without this going to court?

 

Thanks guys, i know you will come through

 

Regards

 

Dave

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they cant find the signed agreement it will make things better for him yes.

 

 

as for these managed loans.

yes they were forced on lots of people

I've put you in the HSBC forum

lots of threads on managed loans to read here.

 

 

as for the credit file

if its already dropped off

or has never shown

it cant come back. to harm him

unless they try and get a CCJ and win.

 

 

is the loan still owned by HSBC

or have they sold it on to some fleecing DCA?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...