Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PCN Code 12 - Unclear Signs - Parking on wrong side of road.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2938 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everybody,

 

I am after some advice with regards to appealing a Penalty Charge Notice.

 

I was doing some work for a client at one of their rental properties in Battersea (Cupar Road).

I turned into Cupar Road from Battersea Park Road and drove to the end

where I saw a parking space on the left (and coincidently right by the house I was working on).

 

 

As I got out of the car I saw the sign saying “Permit Holders or Pay at machine”.

Underneath there was an arrow directing you to the nearest ticket machine.

 

 

In that direction, was another sign stating the same thing; Permit holders or pay at machine.

I went to the machine and got the parkmobile location number and started my parking via the phone app.

 

About 30 minutes into my parking, I see a traffic warden putting a ticket on my car with a Code 12

and for a cost of £130!!!

 

 

I said I had parked via parkmobile and showed him the running app on the phone.

He responded that I have parked on the wrong side of the road!

Permit holders only on one side and a mixture on the other!

 

 

I pointed at the sign when I pulled up (which is right opposite the end space where I had parked.

He said, I need to check the other sign (which was about 10 – 15 yards back down the road,

in the opposite direction of the ticket machine and the arrows on the other signs).

I saw the sign as I got out of the car and another one just over the road both saying pay at machine.

 

The warden noted it was a genuine error and I had paid to park.

He also recognised that I am not a resident and just doing some work there.

 

 

He advised me to appeal and he would write a note saying I was working,

so not familiar with the area and parking restrictions.

 

 

He took photos of the car and the black bags I had lined up to show that we had chatted

and that I was working on the house and not a resident.

He said in all likelihood, the PCN would be overturned.

 

I also took photos of the car with the sign right opposite the car, which would be the first signage you saw from the car,

then backed up with a second sign a little toward the ticket machine which is directly in front of the car.

 

 

It never occurred to me that there would be a third sign lurking a bit further down the road

saying permit holders only or that parking on one side of the road or the other made a difference.

I hadn’t come across this parking arrangement before (Live in a small village in Sussex).

 

 

In my mind, the signage doesn’t make it particularly clear that you have to park on one side of the road or the other.

Plus, the positioning of the signs;

One right at the end saying pay at machine with arrows toward the machine

and another in the opposite direction saying permit holders only.

 

 

As the machine was at the top of the road and that another sign was there inviting you to pay,

I had no reason to walk down the road.

 

 

In my mind, I saw two signs saying pay at machine and that I could pay and park.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you use Google maps to view your parking location the signs are clear enough to read.

 

From what I can see the odd side of the road is residents only. On the opposite side evens is a mix. There are plenty of signs and readable and clear in where and whom can park where.

 

Without giving the house number away where you were visiting where you parked was it on the odd or even side of the road. The pcn should have noted this. If you wish to view these signs the use Google maps they are clear to read and understand...

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's an easy mistake to make, but signs for parking restrictions only apply to that side of the street.

 

You must make an informal appeal within 14 days, explain the circumstances and ask they use their discretion this one time.

 

TBH, it's unlikely they will allow your appeal, but the discount will be re-offered if they reject.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply,

 

Once the signs were pointed out, it became clear.

 

 

On the first street view link below I parked on the right-hand-side at the very end of the bay

(behind the Volvo that is parked there).

 

 

I drove in from the opposite end of the road and saw the free space at the end.

As you can see from street view, there is a sign on the opposite side of the road (2nd link)

which states ‘permit holders or pay at machine’.

 

 

I saw this sign and another one near the machine stating the same thing.

I did not see the sign on the side I parked as it is a good couple of car lengths from the end of the bay,

whereas the pay at machine sign is right at the end of the bay.

 

 

Plus, as I said, the pay at machine sign has arrows directing you to the machine which is in Lurline Gardens.

I also saw the sign there saying pay at machine.

It never occurred to me to walk back down the road to read each and every sign.

 

https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.4762281,-0.1513734,3a,75y,180h,90t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s1Cce6b6c1ejac9LSCgAtjQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

 

https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.4760971,-0.1513271,3a,37.5y,50.54h,88.56t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sDB4B1BfUUY41791U9LSm9w!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's an easy mistake to make, but signs for parking restrictions only apply to that side of the street.

 

You must make an informal appeal within 14 days, explain the circumstances and ask they use their discretion this one time.

 

TBH, it's unlikely they will allow your appeal, but the discount will be re-offered if they reject.

 

 

I only work in London every now and then and hadn't realised that parking signage is for one side only.

I haven't seen it before in other locations, so was news to me (no excuse I know).

 

The warden who gave me the ticket (who was friendly and helpful) did hint that they do get quite a few people

who park in the last two or three spaces of that road as people see the sign opposite first

and then the other sign I over the road. Sneaky positioning I think...

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no payment machine on the street - I would definitely mention that in any appeal letter. Although it's not enough on its own to get the PCN cancelled, it is a factor - if the machine was on the other side of the road, then they could assume you had stood there and looked over to where your car is, thereby seeing the correct signs. The fact that you have to exit the road to pay for your parking does add some weight to your case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no payment machine on the street - I would definitely mention that in any appeal letter. Although it's not enough on its own to get the PCN cancelled, it is a factor - if the machine was on the other side of the road, then they could assume you had stood there and looked over to where your car is, thereby seeing the correct signs. The fact that you have to exit the road to pay for your parking does add some weight to your case.

 

That's correct, the machine is on the other road and the arrows on the signage that I mention all point toward that machine and away from the correct signage. Even looking back at the car, the angle, distance and general amount of vehicles, trees, hedges, houses etc make the sign blend into the background clutter.

I know after it was pointed out that I had parked on the wrong side of the road and I freely admit that. But as said the signs I saw all indicated pay and display. The sign saying not to park here is a sneaky ways back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...