Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • His financial situation isn’t great, and the landlord has made lots of things up. The things he’s put isn’t true at all. My friend did tell the full truth with incoming and outgoing, I helped him fill in his form and he checked bills etc. to make sure it was right. His wage is ok, but not as good as the landlord thinks it is,  and he doesn’t have anything spare. How much are they likely to take from him? Should he send any reply?  the letter just says to take the court letter with him. 
    • Hi welcome to the Forum.  If a PCN is sent out late ie after the 12th day of the alleged offence, the charge cannot then be transferred from the driver to the keeper.T he PCN is deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch so in your case, unless you can prove that Nexus sent the PCN several days after they claim you have very little chance of winning that argument. All is not lost since the majority of PCNs sent out are very poorly worded so that yet again the keeper is not liable to pay the charge, only the driver is now liable. If you post up the PCN, front and back we will be able to confirm whether it is compliant or not. Even if it is ok, there are lots of other reasons why it is not necessary to pay those rogues. 
    • Hi 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No  7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice' I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof?
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

3rd party stored car, garage withholding my car until I pay storage fees


Rich44
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2938 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok not getting replies on other thread guessing length & protracted look putting people off & situation changed so....

 

1. June bought new car

2. July car broke, rejected & returned to vendor

3. Various arguments etc no refund.

4. Vendor moves car to 3rd party garage tells me (no fees mentioned) but not bothered as rejected car already.

5. Ltd Co goes under, director goes bankrupt

6. Go to claim car to minimise losses garage wants £7/day storage fees backdated to November 2015, they admit they're pursuing director already for other bills but say I am liable for storage fees.

 

How do I deal with this? I'm already £2000 down I'm not paying storage fees when I didn't agree or even know about them. They're refusing access to MY car.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds very complicated – but I'm not entirely sure who is who in your story.

 

Which is the limited company which goes under and whose director goes bankrupt? Is this the vendor?

 

Who sold you the car? Is it a company or a private seller?

 

Is the garage anyone of these parties that you have mentioned above? Or are they completely independent and simply not being paid by somebody?

 

It will be helpful if you would simply re-present your story but being more careful to identify all of the parties and it will then be easier to give you some advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok sorry

 

1. Bought a car from limited company in June

2. Spectacularly failed in July was returned & rejected

3. Lots of arguments I was blamed for damage by Ltd company etc

4. Issued court papers after director resigned from company & said "eventually will be struck off" basically walked away from his limited company & he moved car to the local garage he paid to do his repairs - no mention of fees & assumed car was his at this point tbh

5. In Nov 15 only director filed for bankruptcy

6. Am now attempting to recover car from the 3rd party garage where it is stored but they are claiming that I owe them £7/day storage fees.

 

Does that make it any clearer?

 

To be honest at this point I'm just trying to retrieve the car from the garage where the limited company decided to store it but am being refused access and car is being held hostage racking up more & more fees on top.

 

Not trying to elicit sympathy just fill in the financial situation but I'm extremely ill & my income is ESA & the car is worth no more than £1000 as it probably needs a new autobox.

 

I've had a quote of £100 to bring it back here & am prepared to do so at a moments notice but am being blocked.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No he refused to accept the rejection (in writing) & we never got our £3000 back so seeing as the only way of recovering a tiny fraction is to get the car back that's what we're trying to do.

 

I know the storage charges are the Ltd Co's as they arranged it (at least that's the logic I had in my head lol), but I'm trying to explain it to the garage who are claiming I need to pay & have refused me access (again in writing).

 

I don't really know how to deal with them, what laws to quote, who to go to etc

 

No one is contesting my ownership of the vehicle

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've been a member of this forum since 2006. What a shame you didn't come to us in July.

 

Technically speaking I think that it is quite correct that you are no longer the owner of the car because you rejected the contract. The refusal to accept your rejection has absolutely no effect at all and it's a shame that you accepted it. You should certainly have come to see a spike lease that moment.

 

The situation now is certainly that if you carry on with the story about rejecting the contract, then you effectively hand ownership of the car over to the administrators of the bankrupt company and because the garage has in their possession, they may well be in a position to sell it.

 

I suppose that you will be best off not referring to the business of your rejection in case someone realises the legal significance of this.

 

Frankly I'm not entirely sure whether the garage might or might not have a valid lien over the car – even if it is yours.

 

However, your position may as well be that they have a contract with the company and therefore their argument is with the administrators.

 

Meanwhile, they have a duty to mitigate their losses and so therefore they should release the car to you and stop accruing any further storage charges – and you should put this to them in writing.

 

If you have any kind of legal action against and then it would be in the tort of conversion which means that they are usurping your rights of owner. Have a look at the Torts (Wrongful Interference with Goods) Act.

 

You would have to bring a small claim for the recovery of the car. It's not going to be straightforward – and if they manage to argue that they have a legitimate reason to hang onto the car then you could lose the case.

 

I'm sorry to say that I am not completely clear on this aspect of the law.

 

It sounds to me as if, given the condition of the car, given the cost of having to transport it to you, given the cost of putting into some reasonable condition – and you don't really even know if that is the end of the story – given the costs of the legal action and the risk of losing, that you might be best off letting it go and writing it down to experience – and if there is next time come to us a bit earlier.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A thought occurs to me.

 

I think also that there is a high chance of the garage is bluffing. They can't possibly have any interest in retaining and repairing the vehicle and selling it on. They really won't make their money back at all – especially as if they sell it on they will have to offer guarantees et cetera for a car which is in poor condition.

 

This means that if their bluff is called, they are faced with the risk of being in possession of a motorcar that is of no value to them and of losing all of the storage money which they believe they are owed.

 

The more I think about it, the more I think that the garage is in a very bad place will stop

 

If you really want the car back – and frankly I think you are a bit crazy – then I think that you could talk to the owner and explain to him what is going to happen if he insists on full payment – that you will simply walk away and leaving with the car and unpaid bills and not only that, that he will be unable to sell the car because he will not have ownership documents and also he will not be authorised to do so. You should also remind him that while the car is in his possession and he is refusing to let it go, he is responsible for the storage and for the condition of it and making sure that it does not deteriorate and that it is properly looked after. All of this adds up to quite a liability.

 

There you are, and gives you a bit of leverage if you really want it.

 

Also, please would you name the garage and also the directors who have been involved in it. These people sometimes fold up they companies and go on to start new companies and I think that it will help people to understand who they might be dealing with in the future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did come to the forum sooner I said this was a simplification of the long running thread because no one was replying anymore.

 

 

 

I did start dealing with everything then and I followed as suggested unfortunately the trader has made life really hard, lied on numerous occasions I won't go into it all again.

 

 

 

The bankruptcy only cane to light when he filed his defence, he lied repeatedly about that, he said he was resigning for personal reasons on top of that as I said I am extremely ill so I've been dealing with it as best I could.

 

 

 

Tbh I don't think speaking to me like a child is very fair at all, going back to my profile to look up my membership length then tell me off tbh feels rather ott no?

 

 

 

So the fact that I have it in writing that my reasons for rejection are not accepted, not to mention it's the director that's bankrupt the company isn't he's just effectively walked away from it.

 

 

 

I can't walk away from it as it stands the car is worth over a grand as spares when your income is ESA I'm sure you can imagine that's a LOT of money & why should the garage be able to take it to recover any money they claim they're owed.

 

 

 

I'm sorry if you didn't mean to come across that way & I've taken it the wrong way but I don't post on forums lightly as I don't like social interaction much and I don't like being accused of things & defending myself. I just wanted some advice without the attitude

 

 

 

Also I suffer from 2 neurological conditions so calling someone you don't know crazy whilst not deliberately malicious as you don't know me that's the situation that can occur & is rather hurtful nonetheless.

 

 

 

I'm not naming anyone until it's sorted as I don't want anyone to know what is going on given how awkward the OR, the director & the garage are being

 

Thank you for the helpful suggestion I will write to him tonight & see what happens

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...