Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you and yes it was a 10k loan in 2007  but the amount outstanding currently is £17k 
    • Sounds like you've done some great detective work there, well done!   So you now have a good timeline; the car was purchased by the dealer who performed an HPI check and found no finance outstanding. They then sold it to someone who took out their own finance in August 2020. That person sold it to you without informing you that there was finance outstanding in October 2020.   I would think that it would be realtively straightforward for a solicitor to write a letter to MB with the pertinent facts (they will obviously know when and by whom the finance was taken out) and request that they issue a good faith title. It should only cost about £150.   I echo what others have said; don't hassle the seller. I know it is really frustrating and annoying, but he has proved himself a liar and only has to tell the Police that you threatened him and you'll be in trouble!
    • click sar just send it  no need to add anything bar their details   is this charge still showing on her deeds?    
    • i am not aware of any refunds being issued retrospectivity for years when you could have attained free road tax but simply didn't.   you will however gain a refund of any road tax already paid this year backdated to the start of the month you submit now. don't forget you will need the certificate of entitlement number when applying now and keep that certificate safe as you will need it each year.
    • thats quite interesting, as they are giving you a greater int rate before 1993, i am unaware of anything special about that date concerning statutory int , but it means more money for you, so i wouldn't worry yes the spreadsheet is correct.   it runs till the day they settle.   have they actually given a fixed figure for the 15% period, if so, add that the the 'current' spreadsheet result and that should equal what they should be refunding.... does it match?   dx  
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
       
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
       
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
       
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
       
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
       
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
       
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
       
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
       
        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
       
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
       
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
       
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
       
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
       
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
       
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
       
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
       
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

SCS bad flooring - dragged out +2yrs - court to get it resolved??


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1671 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

Hope you can give us a little advise.

 

 

We moved into our property December 2013, and went with SCS,

they organised the fitter as seems to generally be the case and all was well.

Or that's what we thought up until fit.

 

The fitter did a very, very poor job, and we've been working with SCS to try and get this resolved for over 2 years.

 

The original fitter came again out once shortly after the original visit,

repaired a few issues and tried to fob us off saying let it lie and it'll sort itself out,

 

 

as time went by more and more flaws became glaringly obvious

and with the fact he'd been quite willing to bluff, lie, SCS and do a bad job

we completely lost faith that'd he'd do the job properly,

as he never seemed to want to fix everything fully,

just fire fight small issues,

 

 

we went back to SCS to try and get this progressed.

SCS dragged its heels and would go quiet,

sometimes for weeks and months when trying to get this all resolved

to which I'd have to chase and actually contact head office a number of times,

 

 

as we stand now,

we've had 2 alternate fitters and something like 9 or so visits trying to get the flooring

into the condition it should have been after the initial fit.

 

 

The first replacement fitter managed to get the carpet into an acceptable state

approximately a year and a quarter/half after original fit,

dubbed the vinyl/silicon a write off.

 

The second fitter managed to remove some of the silicon and make some improvements,

also inevitably reached conclusion the original vinyl fit and silicon job was so poor

he'd not be able to repair it with the materials in place without a refit.

 

 

He has also left it in a state with the silicon partly removed around the property,

as he knew he could not finish the job and it would need to essentially be refitted.

 

Both of these alternate fitters have left after the attempts with the opinion the original fit/finish

was so bad it couldn't be corrected and the original fitter had done a very very bad job overall.

(it has seriously been over 2 years and 9 visits, so that should give you some idea...)

 

After over two years of me fighting to get this resolved,

my wife is completely fed up with the flooring which was originally selected

to be matching and stylistically consistant across both vinyl and carpet,

and wants to replace the entire lot.

 

 

SCS were willing to consider trying to get the vinyl replaced,

after the experience we've had,

my wife wants to move away to tiles and have a completely fresh start on the property.

 

 

Unfortunately SCS seems to have a smaller flooring range than they did when we first selected them,

and they don't have anything right now she is fond of, or any tiling at all.

 

As this is the situation,

SCS have offered £500 as a settlement towards the vinyl only

(against a costing on the vinyl of around £750 apparently),

or to provide the fitters details so we could essentially take him to small claims court

to try and recover the entire figure that has been paid(around £2000),

with the understanding this may be a long process and maybe not even successful.

 

They have also offered to give us the £500 (to which they'd treat it as case closed/settlement as far as they are concerned)

and still provide the original fitters details so we could chase him for the outstanding figure,

with the awareness the £500 may affect the outcome of any case.

 

Where I'm trying to go really is,

where do we stand in terms of getting this resolved in the laws eyes?

Even the carpet was not to an acceptable standard over a year after fit,

and we have gone through a lot of stress, time and effort (and around 10 fitter visits)

trying to get the property to the state it should have been after the first visit...

 

SCS are falling back on they have just supplied the materials

and the contract after supply of materials is with the fitter,

and that the £500 is out of goodwill due to the time this has taken.

 

 

That said, this seems insulting as the £500 is not even the full vinyl cost,

nor does it cover we are going to have to pay someone to finish removing the poor silicon work

before even fitting new flooring as the last fitter has left this partially complete.

 

 

Additionally,

SCS are essentially the service provider and have supplied this fitter, he wasn't chosen by us

this would seem to place more responsibility on them for the quality of his work

(I seem to remember hearing some time ago an unfair contract cannot be enforced?).

 

 

If John Lewis subcontracted to a 3rd party to do work, and they fluffed up,

I'd expect John Lewis to make good, not to have to chase their 3rd party to court...

 

I'm torn on where to go,

part of me says just take the £500 and start work elsewhere,

 

 

but with the state of the silicon and flooring,

and also the potential affect on a small claims court against the original fitter of accepting this £500

, I'm not even sure I should; or that I should have to.

 

Anyone experienced similar, or has advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You do not Ned the fitters details it is SCS who you go after

Send them a letter before action giving then one last chance to replace

 

Then file a court claim

 

Have you photos of all the problems if not take some now

In future use the local caring company not these big ones who do not care less

 

Silicone is not difficult to remove if you know how:razz:

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did wonder if that was the case, SCS are hiding behind the contract which basically absolves them of all responsibility if it goes wrong, however that doesn't strike me as right. Regardless of whether I had to pay the contractor direct, this was still a service organised by them.

 

The downside is they can't replace themselves, as they don't have anything my wife wants, and as the vinyl needs replaced, the carpet will be going as well, which they argue has now been resolved (yes but it wasnt for over a year, and its still connected with the vinyl)

 

I do have some photos, which I have supplied to SCS previously. That being said additional fitting attempted repair work has been done since, so I will take some more if I'm required to.

 

As my flooring was paid for by finance, a guy over on MSE suggested I make a Section 75 claim against SCS. Am going to try this first and will move to Small Claims if it doesn't go ahead, I'd guess successful SCC would potentially offer a higher payout but be more long winded!

 

Would SCS really be covered if their contract basically absolves them of responsibility with the fitter and they argue its the fitter's issue, or would this fall under unfair contract/supplied services? :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

goto after the finance company too ......who is?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update: Barclays have advised that unfortunately as the contract obligates SCS to supply materials and not fit said materials (regardless of if they supply the fitter), then in this case Section 75 cannot be used.

 

That said, what Barclays are doing is taking this down as an official complaint and are going to send it to SCS themselves. They have advised once issued then SCS have 40 days in which to respond. If they do not, or do not respond satisfactorily, then I will have the option of taking this to the ombudsman who would be able to investigate the wider case more thoroughly.

 

So long and short, not far from where I was originally, but maybe the official note of complain will be enough to stir SCS into offering a more satisfactory response. Otherwise, I may indeed have to take the fitter/SCS to small claims court.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...