Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advice from Ind. Financial Advisor. correct?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2524 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Reading the advice about non-priority debts and what you should offer those creditors... it says,

 

You cannot split your surplus, between credit cards, and then pay a loan.. (basically)..

 

however, what do you do in the case of a joint loan?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have 5 credit cards, and a joint loan with my wife. when contacting the credit card companies, what do i do about the shared loan.

 

Will they just split it, with what my wife has to pay, and what i have to pay, and i treat the 50% of what i owe, as a normal unsecured loan, just like the credit

cards? (when offering them an amount to pay each month)

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok. have worked out a budget sheet, and it works out at negative £250 a month.

 

should i be offering a token £1 a month to each of the creditors, or nothing?

 

yes, my financial situation is now dire.

 

i need information on the joint loan i have with my wife. i cannot afford to pay for it, but she likely can. what happens with this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive just written to 5 credit card companies, saying that i couldn't afford to pay them.

 

I included a statement of incoming, outgoings.. which totalled a -£250 a month total

 

my question is, should i pay them £1 a month >?

 

(ive seen this written all over the place)..

Link to post
Share on other sites

£1 a month is considered a token payment until they agree to a repayment plan. It shows willingness to repay the debt and that you have acknowledged it and arent avoiding it.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

You only need pay what you can honestly afford as long as your income and expenditure shows clearly that £1 per creditor is the honest amount.Credit Card companies are low priority debts.

 

Probably you will get refusals from some of the companies,do not worry just continue to pay them the £1 they cannot refuse the payment

 

Wish you luck

 

FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bit i dont understand with the posts above.. is that a credit card debt after 6 years is written off, so to speak.. but, only if you haven't made a payment? doesnt the £1 count as a payment ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No. It becomes statute barred if you havent made a payment or acknowledged the debt in writing. If you have referred to it as my debt or my account, then you reset the timer. Thats why we always advise for people to say "the above debt", or " the above account".

 

If you make a £1 payment, then you have acknowledged it and reset the timer.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you think you are likely to get away for 6 years not paying 5 different credit card companies, without legal proceedings happening at some stage,then please think again.Remember you have written to these companies stating you cannot afford to pay,so you have acknowledged the debts.If your I&E confirms you can only pay £1 fine, just continue to pay this amount,all the time you are making regular payments,it is difficult for your creditors to take any action they are likely to win,in most cases.

 

This site is designed to help you with your debts not for the avoidance of them.There is a mountain of advise concerning your rights,and your creditors rights,and the rights of DCAs,

 

Regards FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you look at my original post, you will see i stated that my surplus, is negative £250 a month. I now only have my salary to support myself, my mortgage, and my two children.

 

The confusing bit, is that i keep seeing this £1 a month thing. They can all take me to every court they like, i don't see where its coming from.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again £1 is a minimum token payment. It shows you acknowledge the debt and do want to pay it off. If they ever take you to court, even though youve shown the creditors a I&E summary, the judge would look down on them as its clear you are unable to repay and they ignored it. The judge then has multiple options at their disposal for dealing with the debt.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

SB is no matter now as the OP has already acknowledged the debts. The timer would have been reset.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh i agree. I was under the impression they were less than 6 years though.

 

However, we need info from the OP to find out if he acknowledged the debts within the initial 6 year period. If he did, then SB doesnt come into play. If he only acknowledged after the 6 years were up, then he can stop payments, send the SB letter and laugh at them.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Moradin sorry missed the - sign,this puts a whole new perspective into place.

 

Questions,when did you last pay any money to the credit card companies? How old are the credit cards,any prior to 2007?Any with PPI?

 

The letters you sent to the 5 companies what exactly did you say?

 

Regards FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. i have just stopped paying them. they are all fairly recent, some maybe 4-5 years since i've had them.

 

I just wrote to them all saying that as i only had my salary, mortgage etc, i could not afford to pay them. i included a summary of primary bills, gas elec, mortgage, one car loan.

then all the other debts. (5 credit cards).

 

None have PPI.

 

So, my statement just shows how i will somehow be negative £250 a month, and that severe financial hardship was coming my way.

 

I asked them to freeze the interest, and any penalities. and also to only communicate with me via post.

 

I didn't offer to pay anything in the letter.

Edited by Moradin
added stuff
Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you checked to see if any of the debts have Penalty fees? Those are reclaimable too.

 

You did the right thing by stopping payments and also sending them a letter advising them of your situation. It's time now to relax a little, and wait for their replies to come in. Remember, if they refuse to acknowledge your circumstances, then send the letter from the CAG library. Failing that, its time to start formal complaints.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Went to see an IFA today.. and recieved some information which, i think , conflicts with what i've read on here.. (might be me making the mistake).

 

He has said, that debts owed, are not wiped from your credit file, until 6 years, after satisfaction..

 

ie: they stay there.. and if you want a mortgage or something, they would still be considered, even after the 6 years.

 

My CC;s are on 4 years. and i will need to change my mortage in the short.mid term.

Link to post
Share on other sites

are they defaulted?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then they will vanish on the defaults 6th birthday

never to harm you further if you don't disclose them

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this an ICO rule.. ?

 

He seemed certain that it was a ''common misconception' that everything dissapears after 6 years....

 

https://www.nationaldebtline.org/EW/factsheets/Pages/25%20EW%20Time%20limits%20for%20recovering%20debts/Default.aspx?gclid=Cj0KEQjwoM63BRDK_bf4_MeV3ZEBEiQAuQWqkR13f1yo8LIQmCTmWbucE0mKWU-ljs15Q2ZCZY8tY1UaAlUl8P8HAQ#

 

What does ‘statute-barred’ mean?

 

icon_fact.jpgSee our fact sheet:

 

Credit reference agencies and credit reports.

 

 

If a debt is barred under statute, it means that by law (the Limitation Act), the lender has run out of time to use certain types of action to try and make you pay the debt.

Statute-barred does not mean the debt no longer exists. In some circumstances, the creditor, or a debt collection agency, can still try and recover money from you. You can choose to pay if you wish. Even if the debt is statute-barred, it may still be on your credit reference file. This may make it harder for you to get further credit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

its nothing to do with statute barring.....

 

if your debts are defaulted...

 

this is what the ICO says:

 

All references to a defaulted debt must be removed from your credit files after 6 years

has passed from date of default, whether paid off or not.

.

{the WHOLE ACCOUNT WILL VANISH, never to return}.

.

{however, this does not mean the debt itself is not still owed

consider a CCA request.}

.

This is so that someone who continues paying something

- even after 6 years from default

- should not be at a disadvantage to someone who pays nothing after default

and ends up with a clean file after 6 years.

.

NOTE: {the bracketed text is not ICO guideline but my advise]

...

 

and ofcourse if you don't show old copies

they wont show

you say nowt

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...