Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


bob 3456

southern pacific variations of and eurosail

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1050 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi

Id like to keep this separate from my other threads, but i`ve been constantly told by Acenden acting on behalf of Eurosail that they cant do anything as regards charges (or anything else) on our account before Nov 2010 when they supposed took ownership of our loan from Southern Pacific mortgage limited (also known as London Mortgage company , Southern Pacific Personal Loans ,etc......).

I was furious when also told this by an FOS adjudicator as well .

 

How can this be ?

Southern Pacific Personal Loans Limited are supposedly in insolvency with an address in Leeds, but Southern Pacific Mortgage Limited also named on our paperwork appear to be still going (active and operating from 110-118 Union Street London.)

 

Southern Pacific personal Loans limited (also known as London Mortgages) are described in our paperwork as the appointed representatives of Southern Pacific Mortgage limited.

 

So i would assume SPML would be described as the parent company of SPPL (London Mortages) and so should be liable for the account prior to Nov 2010.

 

Am i completely naive and wrong in thinking this??

 

Southern Pacific were responsible for alot of the charges /capitalised fees amongst other irregularities on our account.

Is there any point in pushing for an actual ombudsmans decision when the adjudicators decision is something we feel is a ridiculous decision.

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are unhappy with the Adjudicator's response, then IMHO, I would push for an Ombudsman proper.

 

If you have any other arguments to put forward then you need to do this at the same time as requesting the escalation.


Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

 

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

 

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy -

HERE

2: Take back control of your finances -

Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors?

Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt

Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated -

Please Read

 

 

BCOBS

 

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

 

 

 

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks but what about the responsibility between SPML and SPPL as i see it they are the same compmapny even if SPPL are supposedly in adminsteration under Price Waterhouse Coopers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I too am trying to track down these two companies and have read a court case in 2013 where the judge gave the liquidators permission to dispose of all the data for SPPL. Neutral Citation Number: [2013] EWHC 2485 (Ch). Ascenden responses merely provide the address of the liquidators to customers wanting SPPL info etc, despite the court letting them junk their files. What hope is there with this going on. It seems the courts think that individuals are only fishing either directly or through claims business' yet some of us have very real complaints about serious administration errors on their contracts, mis-selling et al. SPPL were actively selling mortgages over the telephone to customers with small secured loans, converting them into first charge mortgages, so selling between themselves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...