Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Work from home is "an aberration" that will be corrected as soon as possible says Goldman Sachs chief. View the full article
    • Work from home is "an aberration" that will be corrected as soon as possible says Goldman Sachs chief. View the full article
    • The mini electric vehicle being made by China's biggest carmaker is now outselling Tesla two to one. View the full article
    • https://www.bindmans.com/news/neale-v-dpp-the-right-to-silence-citizens-duties-and-coronavirus-regulations   Perhaps the OP should have said nothing - and risked arrest!   "Firstly, the case calls into question the logic behind aspects of the criminal justice response to the public health crisis created by the Coronavirus pandemic...   "Secondly, it is clear that some police officers have misunderstood and misstated their powers, and citizens’ obligations, under the Regulations and at common law...   "Thirdly, the case confirms reasonable excuses for being outside are not limited to those explicitly set out in the Regulations. Police officers considering whether there are reasonable grounds for believing that an offence has been committed under the Regulations so that an FPN may be issued, or the reasonable grounds for suspicion that are necessary for an arrest, should give proper consideration to any explanation given by members of the public (and what a court might think of them) rather than only recognising those exceptions explicitly listed in the Regulations and/or government guidance...   Fourthly, the case is an example of a failure of the CPS review into prosecutions brought under Coronavirus Regulations, which has found that alarming numbers of cases were wrongly charged..."   Above quotes from the Bindman's article, not the decision.  Case arose from the first lockdown and was in Wales.  Same now?  Also was about not being at home - not mask wearing.    
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

bbc iplayer'loophole' to be closed


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1522 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

'The culture secretary has vowed to end the iPlayer "loophole" soon, so those watching catch-up TV do not get "a free ride"....John Whittingdale said the licence fee would be extended so it no longer just applied to live television viewers.'

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-35708623

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

 

An agreement was reached between the government and the BBC last July that the government would update licence fee legislation, as part of negotiations that saw the corporation agreeing to cover the cost of providing free licences for over-75s.

 

In his keynote speech, Mr Whittingdale said: "Having discussed this with the BBC and the BBC Trust, I will be bringing forward, as soon as practicable, secondary legislation which will extend the current TV licensing regime, not only to cover those watching the BBC live but also those watching the BBC on catch-up through the iPlayer."

 

I think that ALL TV companies should contribute to the free licenences for over 75's

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

 

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

 

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

 

 

BCOBS

 

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

 

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

What loophole though. The law clearly says live tv or radio transmissions.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites
What loophole though. The law clearly says live tv or radio transmissions.

they see it as a 'loophole', though not technically one as such atm. its to change the law so it includes the beebs catchup stuff ie not just live?

how it wld/cld be enforced though, prob via an increase in the 'ultra vires' licence fee :lol:

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Soon we will need a license to breath!

 

As there are already reports of court orders based on 'seeing flickering lights through the curtains', You'll have to prove you were incapable of watching it

- impossible of course unless you have no internet/mobile phone or anything like and even then they can say you must be hiding it somewhere.

Strip searches by the license goons ...

"In every respect, he has acted responsibly, legally and with integrity"

Boris Johnson on Dominic Cummings' Covid field trips

 

£288 million pounds a week - The ADDITIONAL cost of Brexit customs bureaucracy alone - stuff that on the side of a bus.

 

Its official: Boris 'The Liar' Johnsons word is not worth the paper its written on

Link to post
Share on other sites
they see it as a 'loophole', though not technically one as such atm. its to change the law so it includes the beebs catchup stuff ie not just live?

how it wld/cld be enforced though, prob via an increase in the 'ultra vires' licence fee :lol:

 

Easy - have you need to put in your TV license number (or register for access) before they let you access it on the web. Job done.

"In every respect, he has acted responsibly, legally and with integrity"

Boris Johnson on Dominic Cummings' Covid field trips

 

£288 million pounds a week - The ADDITIONAL cost of Brexit customs bureaucracy alone - stuff that on the side of a bus.

 

Its official: Boris 'The Liar' Johnsons word is not worth the paper its written on

Link to post
Share on other sites
Easy - have you need to put in your TV license number (or register for access) before they let you access it on the web. Job done.

 

Except if it was that easy and true, theyd have already done that a long time ago.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites
As there are already reports of court orders based on 'seeing flickering lights through the curtains', You'll have to prove you were incapable of watching it

- impossible of course unless you have no internet/mobile phone or anything like and even then they can say you must be hiding it somewhere.

Strip searches by the license goons ...

 

They have to prove you were watching live tv. You could have been watching a DVD, or watching youtube on your tv.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites
Except if it was that easy and true, theyd have already done that a long time ago.

 

It is that simple, its just that previously it wasn't worthwhile as the majority were catchup where a license isnt yet required - hence not worth the trouble.

 

They have to prove you were watching live tv. You could have been watching a DVD, or watching youtube on your tv.

 

Actually - they dont, they should have to - but they dont

http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/about/foi-administering-the-licence-fee-AB20

 

 

"A magistrate (or sheriff in Scotland) has discretion to grant a search warrant for authorised persons to search premises suspected of illegal activity in respect of television licensing. It is an offence to intentionally obstruct a person exercising the warrant (see section 366(8) of the Communications Act 2003). TV Licensing will be accompanied by the police when executing a search warrant."

"In every respect, he has acted responsibly, legally and with integrity"

Boris Johnson on Dominic Cummings' Covid field trips

 

£288 million pounds a week - The ADDITIONAL cost of Brexit customs bureaucracy alone - stuff that on the side of a bus.

 

Its official: Boris 'The Liar' Johnsons word is not worth the paper its written on

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/part/4

 

 

excerpt

(7)Where a person has the power by virtue of a warrant under this section to examine or test any television receiver found on any premises, or in any vehicle, it shall be the duty—

 

(a)of a person who is on the premises or in the vehicle, and

 

(b)in the case of a vehicle, of a person who has charge of it or is present when it is searched,

 

to give the person carrying out the examination or test all such assistance as that person may reasonably require for carrying it out.

 

(8)A person is guilty of an offence if he—

 

(a)intentionally obstructs a person in the exercise of any power conferred on that person by virtue of a warrant under this section; or

 

(b)without reasonable excuse, fails to give any assistance that he is under a duty to give by virtue of subsection (7).

"In every respect, he has acted responsibly, legally and with integrity"

Boris Johnson on Dominic Cummings' Covid field trips

 

£288 million pounds a week - The ADDITIONAL cost of Brexit customs bureaucracy alone - stuff that on the side of a bus.

 

Its official: Boris 'The Liar' Johnsons word is not worth the paper its written on

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are quite a few countries that have abolished the TV licence and publicly fund.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television_licence

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

 

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

 

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

 

 

BCOBS

 

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

 

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites
There are quite a few countries that have abolished the TV licence and publicly fund.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television_licence

 

Yes, Yet our government has implemented a law supporting TVL where not breaking the law and simply requiring them to leave you alone can be interpreted by a magistrate as grounds for a search warrant.

 

I didn't believe this at first, but it does appear to be true. - although many of the other statements readily seen would certainly seem to be false - like they have to catch you watching TV - well no they dont - a TV set up to receive channels, even if the Aeriel isnt plugged in would seem to see you prosecuted.

"In every respect, he has acted responsibly, legally and with integrity"

Boris Johnson on Dominic Cummings' Covid field trips

 

£288 million pounds a week - The ADDITIONAL cost of Brexit customs bureaucracy alone - stuff that on the side of a bus.

 

Its official: Boris 'The Liar' Johnsons word is not worth the paper its written on

Link to post
Share on other sites
Easy - have you need to put in your TV license number (or register for access) before they let you access it on the web. Job done.

 

I cannot see any other way of restricting access to iPlayer unless with a licence number. Mind you, what would stop me giving my licence number to my sons?

 

I haven't read this yet, but this is the Culture Secretary's full keynote speech today:

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/culture-secretary-keynote-to-oxford-media-convention-2016

Link to post
Share on other sites
I cannot see any other way of restricting access to iPlayer unless with a licence number. Mind you, what would stop me giving my licence number to my sons?

 

I haven't read this yet, but this is the Culture Secretary's full keynote speech today:

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/culture-secretary-keynote-to-oxford-media-convention-2016

 

 

It says little apart from some BBC trumpet blowing, whinging about online ad blockers and saying that BBC programs online were never intended to be free and they intend to close that loophole.

 

The real issue is how they close the loophole.

 

If they just extend the TVL bullboys rights, then you pc, laptop and phone will also come under their 'investigation' completely breaching the requirement to reasonable privacy expected but never mentioned in their current investigations.

 

The only realistic way is to require registration to watch it with confirmation of licence at/during registration.

 

Its my opinion that anything openly broadcast on any media should be free to receive - or not to receive as you wish.

 

Sky and VM manage it - why not the BBC.

"In every respect, he has acted responsibly, legally and with integrity"

Boris Johnson on Dominic Cummings' Covid field trips

 

£288 million pounds a week - The ADDITIONAL cost of Brexit customs bureaucracy alone - stuff that on the side of a bus.

 

Its official: Boris 'The Liar' Johnsons word is not worth the paper its written on

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems to me on examination that there appear to be some simple facts

The word of the law (as shown in the links above) allows suspicion as a valid reason to give a search warrent to TVL, and at least some magistrates also appear to hold that view.

... despite TVL statements here http://www.lime-marmalade.net/philip_dean.html

 

 

Obstructing (very subjective)

Obstructing a search warrant, even a TVL one, is a separate offense clearly defined in the links above which does not require any guilt proven on the issue the search warrant was granted for.

The law as stated is linked above

In addition to the video linked on a number of the anti-TVL sites, there are a number of local newspaper reports detailing such events.

Heres one http://www.burtonmail.co.uk/Television-licence-trial-begin-today/story-25958759-detail/story.html

 

 

PACE

TVL are not required to follow PACE requirements, they are required to give a 'caution'

http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/about/foi-administering-the-licence-fee-AB20

"

What is a prosecution statement? A prosecution statement is a record of an interview which takes place under caution, conducted by TV Licensing enquiry officers if they suspect that an offence under the Communications Act 2003 has been committed.

When taking statements enquiry officers must have regard to the Police and Criminal Evidence Act Codes of Practice (‘the PACE Codes’) or Scottish criminal law (depending on where the address is). This means enquiry officers have a duty to caution the individual concerned of their legal rights before taking a statement if the individual still wishes to give a statement. Most of the PACE Codes do not apply to enquiry officers as they do not have any power to arrest or detain people, enter premises or seize property. The PACE Codes only apply to enquiry officers in so far as it imposes a duty on them to give a caution.

 

 

 

There is a duty to respect your privacy, but dont read too much into that.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0eNVR3Ar16ZbDlKeldrVzFhZE0/edit?pref=2&pli=1

Note the PACE statement in the above contradict the 'facts' on the TVL site

http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/about/foi-administering-the-licence-fee-AB20

 

 

 

 

I am NOT legally qualified in any way and THESE ARE MY OPINIONS based on some research AND SHOULD BE confirmed with a suitable LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE

"In every respect, he has acted responsibly, legally and with integrity"

Boris Johnson on Dominic Cummings' Covid field trips

 

£288 million pounds a week - The ADDITIONAL cost of Brexit customs bureaucracy alone - stuff that on the side of a bus.

 

Its official: Boris 'The Liar' Johnsons word is not worth the paper its written on

Link to post
Share on other sites

They might as well make it compulsory for every adult to pay a TV licence, whether they normally watch a TV or not. If they walk down a high street they will pass shops selling TV's. If they go to a pub, they may watch TV. Etc etc,

 

If every adult paid a licence, rather than a household, they could reduce the fee to about £25 a year each.

 

Nobody would be exempt from paying.

 

In the modern world we are in, where you can watch it on numerous devices anywhere you want to, it is illogical to maintain a household licencing system.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

"In every respect, he has acted responsibly, legally and with integrity"

Boris Johnson on Dominic Cummings' Covid field trips

 

£288 million pounds a week - The ADDITIONAL cost of Brexit customs bureaucracy alone - stuff that on the side of a bus.

 

Its official: Boris 'The Liar' Johnsons word is not worth the paper its written on

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it only BBC iplayer or all catch up? I don't have a licence and I'd be happy enough to be checked because my TV isn't tuned in to receive live channels. If this is intended to only apply to BBC iplayer how on earth will they police it?

Link to post
Share on other sites
If every adult paid a licence, rather than a household, they could reduce the fee to about £25 a year each.

 

Like they tried to introduce with the Poll Tax that ended in riots.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you search for worldwide TV licencing you will see a Wiki page. Quite interesting reading. UK was first to introduce licences and it is now pretty common. Germany actually charges a higher licence. Some still charge for radio.

 

They could scrap licences and just fund all TV subsidies from general taxation. BBC should be forced to accept more advertising and the money should be spread across different broadcasters.l

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The £25 if every household pays just doesnt stack up unc.

By those calculations only 1/6th of households are paying.

"In every respect, he has acted responsibly, legally and with integrity"

Boris Johnson on Dominic Cummings' Covid field trips

 

£288 million pounds a week - The ADDITIONAL cost of Brexit customs bureaucracy alone - stuff that on the side of a bus.

 

Its official: Boris 'The Liar' Johnsons word is not worth the paper its written on

Link to post
Share on other sites
The £25 if every household pays just doesnt stack up unc.

By those calculations only 1/6th of households are paying.

 

oops - sorry misread

"In every respect, he has acted responsibly, legally and with integrity"

Boris Johnson on Dominic Cummings' Covid field trips

 

£288 million pounds a week - The ADDITIONAL cost of Brexit customs bureaucracy alone - stuff that on the side of a bus.

 

Its official: Boris 'The Liar' Johnsons word is not worth the paper its written on

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...