Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Councils in UK breaking the Law


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2982 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Under the 2104 Children and Families Act 2014

Councils have certain Statutory directives regarding children who are not in education, for whatever reason.

 

 

My daughter has been out of education for three years with separation anxiety

brought about by her mother's domestic violence.

 

 

Under the Act the Council are supposed to have provided 'alternative education' for her.

The Act says they must work with schools/colleges to identify children in need

and consult with them/their parents and other professional

to provide alternatives suitable to their needs.

 

 

Under the Equality Act and SEN regulations she is now classed as 'disabled and with SEN needs.

However to date the Council have not followed any of the statutory directives.

They have not even contacted me about her.

 

I have complained to them.

No result.

 

 

I have complained to the Local Government Ombudsman.

No result.

 

 

I have complained to the Ministry of Education, told it was not their remit.

 

 

How can I get them brought to task and get my daughter compensation for loss of education resulting from their not following the law?

 

 

All over the UK there are families in the same situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be helpful to to have a bit more information.

 

-- How old is your daughter?

 

-- Have you been Home Educating her for the last 3 years?

 

-- Does she have an Education Health and Care Plan [EHCP] (what was previously an SEN Statement)? If so what school does it name? If not have you requested an EHCP assessment and with what result.

 

-- What do you mean by 'alternative education'? Alternative to what? Unless an EHCP identifies alternative provision - ie, placement in a provision that isn't a mainstream school - the council's general duty would be to ensure a place in a mainstream school. Have you applied for a place in a mainstream school, and with what result?

 

-- What response did you get from LGO? 'No result' is too vague to comment on. What exactly did they say? Can you post up their reply with identifying details removed?

 

-- You say your daughter is classed as disabled under the Equality Act 2010. Do the Council accept she is disabled under the Act, ie that her separation anxiety is a physical or mental impairment? Has she had a clinical diagnosis confirming that she is disabled? Did the diagnosis identify what 'reasonable adjustments' should be made?

Link to post
Share on other sites

She is now just 17. It all started when she was 14.

She is on roll at a local college but due to anxiety she starts to vomit every day so doesn't attend. As it would be with any conventional education. No one from the Council has ever contacted us about her non-attendance.

We applied for an EHP, which got lost. Complained to Local Govt. Ombudsman who could do much except tell them off.

Alternative as in Online Virtual Academy .

My daughter is disabled as she fulfills the requirements of the Equality Act.

She is SEN for the same reason.

The Council have been aware of her difficulty since 2014 when I contacted them for help. I got nothing and no advice or directions like, 'local offer'. I had heard nothing then for 18 months.

CAMHS diagnosed anxiety on private referral. A local Charity dealing with children from Domestic Violence did also.

I am waiting the LGO to respond my last complaint but isn't he toothless. I want to make the Council to be punished for breaking the law as in statutory directives.

Link to post
Share on other sites

bevington, I have moved your thread to Special needs - I think you will attract more attention there. You need do nothing, it was purely an administrative move.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The LGO has powers but you need to see what his adjudication is about your current complaint. Did LGO investigate your complaint that "We applied for an EHP, which got lost"?

 

Are you sure that your daughter is still on roll at the college if she hasn't attended for 3 years? Seems odd that Council never followed up her non-attendance, but possibly the college didn't tell them? It would be the college's duty to follow up non-attendance initially, did they? Could the college have just taken her off roll? She's past statutory school age so doesn't have to be at school or college, although 16-18 year olds are supposed to be in employment, education or training of some sort.

 

Does council accept she has SEN? Having a disability doesn't automatically mean she has SEN.

 

It's not clear that the council have broken any laws, but it would need much more detail than you can publish here to know. The Council has a duty(since September 2014) to publish the Local Offer, but that's an information website to allow you to identify SEND provision and take steps to access. The Council are obliged to support you in doing that and it sounds as if their failure to do that is part of your complaint to the LGO. I don't believe they are under a duty to seek you out and make offers to you.though. Which section of the Children and Families Act 2014 do you believe the Council has broken?

Link to post
Share on other sites

A further thought bevington, have you been in touch with local SEND parent support groups? How to find them should be on the Council's Local Offer page? They'll be able to help you more than we can here because you can go into it in much more detail with them. I can understand why you are keen to punish the Council and claim compensation from them but I don't know whether you have any legal grounds for that. Citizen's Advice might be able to help.

 

At this stage I would be more concerned about getting your daughter into an education provision than with punishing the Council. It sounds like she has no formal GCSEs or qualifications as a result of not attending college. As your daughter has a disability and maybe SEN too you could take your claim to the SEND Tribunal, but that's something you really need to take advice on from Citizen's Advice and local SEN groups or SEN legal charities.

 

Forgot to ask in last reply, when you say "We applied for an EHP, which got lost. Complained to Local Govt. Ombudsmanicon who could do much except tell them off", I'd expect LGO to direct Council to reconsider your request for ECHP for your daughter. Did the LGO direct that? It's seems unlikely Council would ignore the LGO adjudication or lose your request a second time. What did the Council say? Did they carry out an assessment? If not what was their reason for not doing so?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply you obviously know your stuff. Under the Code of Practice Children and Families Act it says,' the early identification of children and young people's needs and early intervention to support them'. Didn't happen. Also collaboration between education, health and social care services to provide support. Didn't happen.

 

Both are statutory directives and if not done since they are statutory then surely the law is broken ? I recently took my daughter off the College roll, she hadn't attended for 18 months.

 

My daughter has not had a formal diagnosis of SEN or being disabled but fulfills all the criteria in the Acts. ( a physical or mental impairment that has a long term and substantial adverse effect on their ability to carry out normal day to day activities)( SEN has a disability which prevents or hinders them from making use of educational facilities of a kind provided for others of the same age) In the statutory guidance 2015 children missing education part of the introduction says: Local Authorities should have a robust procedure and policies in place to meet their duty in relation to children missing education. Didn't happen.

 

Also section 436A of the Education Act 1996 has been ignored. Local Authorities must: arrange suitable full time education for children of compulsory school age who because of illness would not receive suitable education. For the two years of the time this applied to my daughter and was never done. At the onset of this problem 2014 I contacted the Council for help; spoke with a Senior Education Welfare Officer and the Councils specially dedicated Children's Officer and never heard any more.

 

My contact with MARU advised me to Home Ed ( illegal ?) I have for three years been unaware of the 'Local Offer'. No one has ever directed me to it and the code of practice says it must be accessible and readily available. Can't be if you don't know it exists. My daughter is covered I think by the law to age 25.

 

Is that correct?

Edited by Andyorch
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

Under the 2104 Children and Families Act 2014

Councils have certain Statutory directives regarding children who are not in education, for whatever reason.

 

 

My daughter has been out of education for three years with separation anxiety

brought about by her mother's domestic violence.

 

 

Under the Act the Council are supposed to have provided 'alternative education' for her.

The Act says they must work with schools/colleges to identify children in need

and consult with them/their parents and other professional

to provide alternatives suitable to their needs.

 

 

Under the Equality Act and SEN regulations she is now classed as 'disabled and with SEN needs.

However to date the Council have not followed any of the statutory directives.

They have not even contacted me about her.

 

I have complained to them.

No result.

 

 

I have complained to the Local Government Ombudsman.

No result.

 

 

I have complained to the Ministry of Education, told it was not their remit.

 

 

How can I get them brought to task and get my daughter compensation for loss of education resulting from their not following the law?

 

 

All over the UK there are families in the same situation.

 

What does your daughter (& you) want as an achievable / realistic outcome?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I want three things.

1) An EHP plan put in place with funding for an online virtual academy (NISAI) Also a personal budget.

2) I want the Council to compensate my daughter for the time they 'neglected' her.

3) The Council to totally implement their statutory duty with regard to children outside education for reasons of disability and illness and exclusions and to be more transparent in its process.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I work quite a lot with the education system bevington but I'm definitely not a SEND expert!

 

You are correct that Councils' SEND/EHCP duties now run up to age 25, and that Council's have a duty to have robust procedures for children missing education [CME], but note that the latter duty only applies to children of compulsory school age (ie up to 16). Post-16, Councils now have a separate duty to ensure that 16 - 18 year olds are participating in education, employment or training. It's known as the Raising the Participation Age [RPA] duty and there's info on this link if you haven't seen it. The CME duty is more robust than RPA, mainly because the focus of CME is safeguarding and child protection, whilst RPA is about developing employability skills.

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/349300/Participation_of_Young_People_Statutory_Guidance.pdf

 

Time is critical for your daughter in getting her into appropriate education and I would give that priority over holding the council to account for past failures. Time is ticking away and she's already just turned 17. On the face of it there is a clear path you should follow. You want the Council to carry out an EHC needs assessment and you want them to fund a placement at NISAI. From what you've posted that sounds an entirely reasonable request that the Council must properly consider. They shouldn't ignore it or dismiss out of hand. If they do, or if they don't agree to issue an EHCP, or they issue an EHCP that you don't agree with, I'd go straight to the SEND Tribunal. Tribunal judges have wide powers to issue directives to the Council, and many cases to SEND Tribunal are appeals against Councils refusing EHCP assessments or refusing to fund appropriate provision. There are quite a few voluntary organisation out there supporting parents in taking cases to Tribunal. IPSEA is best known one nationally (see link) but I hear they are swamped with requests for help so it can take some time before you can see them. You might need to research other parent support groups or voluntary legal organisations. There are timelimits for bringing SEND Tribunal claims so don't delay.

 

https://www.ipsea.org.uk/contact/advice-and-support/tribunal-helpline

 

Also GOV.UK advice: https://www.gov.uk/special-educational-needs-disability-tribunal/overview

 

I wouldn't waste time with LGO complaints because of the Tribunal time-limits. I imagine you know that LGO can only look at a Council's administrative processes, not at the merits of their decision, so an LGO adjudication most likely would just tell Council to go back and reconsider your needs assessment properly. LGO can't overturn a Council's refusal to issue an EHCP if the Council has followed its procedures correctly, but a SEND Tribunal can. LGO's remit re SEND here

 

http://www.lgo.org.uk/publications/fact-sheets/complaints-about-special-educational-needs/

 

Compensation and action against Council for past failings is not really my field, you may need to talk to Citizens Advice or a solicitor. I don't know who MARU are, a support or advisory group of some sort I assume. I doubt it's ever illegal to advise Home Education but it's not appropriate unless parents are willing and capable of delivering it. BTW, Local Offer duty is relatively new, only became mandatory from September 2014.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You keep mentioning 'Compensation' when that should be the last thing mentioned. Any letters with that in it will be treated as someone wanting money first and maybe education as well.

 

Forget the compensation, get the other things sorted and then go about seeing if you are entitled to any compensation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You misunderstand my motivation. If they have to pay for their mistake then maybe, just maybe they will be a bit more careful. The other things like getting an education for her and a personal budget are the priority. Everything else is secondary. Sorry if I sounded mercenary.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...