Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all. I would be grateful of some advice please if anyone is able to help. I had a new washing machine delivered by Currys on 5th Feb. It was faulty from the start so I tried to inform Currys. They told me to contact the manufacturer. I knew that they were wrong to insist on this but I did so anyway, and I now have an email trail from LG telling me that an engineer visit is needed. I refused the engineer visit and told Currys I wanted to use the 30 day rejection as per CRA2015. I know CRA2015 fairly well because I had to use it for a faulty car last year. Currys just kept telling me that I had to go back to the manufacturer. In desperation I emailed the Currys/PCworld/Dixons CEO. I realise that he won't have seen the email but one of his minions got in touch and promised to help. After a very lengthy email conversation over a few days this guy told me to contact the manufacturer!  I sent Currys (by post and email) a Letter Before Action, telling them that if it wasn't sorted by 15th March I would take action. I offered mediation but they ignored it. I sent the email to head office and sent copies to all staff I had previously dealt with as well as the CEO. I received one email reply, from the CEO's minion, telling me that he was sorry that we had been unable to resolve this amicably. To date I have received no reply to the LBA, nor do I expect to receive one.  I have used moneyclaim online before, so I am not too worried about doing that. The only issue I have is that I know that if I lose I will be liable for their fees, so do I let these people get away with this or is there some way I can guarantee that I won't be faced with huge fees?  Thanks for reading this far!
    • Just a point example on the stats being used One person in four in England has some antibody protection against Covid, ONS survey suggests "According to an Office for National Statistics survey, an estimated one person in four in England would have tested positive..."   ... 25% of population with antibodies is a bit crap as handcock claims about 40% of adults (given very limited testing of children) have been vaccinated and there have been about 4 million people have tested positive (many/most of whom would still have anti-bodies) vaccinated or not
    • throw the 'i did have the cards and spent the money so...' morality trip out the window... when did you take the cards out? when did you last pay them anything or use the cards?    p'haps it's better to look at a wider picture here...   are there other old debts on your credit file you have also ran away from? could others pull the same stunt and get easy default judgements to an old address?   during the period when these 3 cards were granted was your credit file shot with lots of defaults and bad markers and negative information?        
    • Will do. Thanks so much. I’ll keep you posted.
    • Service to last known address is deemed good service by the courts.......hence its important to always update your address with current and past creditors....you not receiving the claims is therefore not really a reason to set a side.   If your happy to accept the judgments then its vital you get a payment plan in place by utilising the N245 form...(this stops any threats of any Bailiff visits)  assume the judgments are all forthwith defaults judgment and no payment plan was set by the court ?     .
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

I step in constantly during my manager's long term absense


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1834 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I have a question and I was wondering if someone could help me.

 

My manager has some health issues ( depression among other stuff) and during the past 3 years he has been off for a total of 9 months. 5 and 4 months continuously during 2 years and has now been off for over a week.

 

I have a feeling he will get another long term leave which of course as it is health related I totally understand he might need it. But the issue is that every time during his long absence , I end up doing his job and it involves allot of stuff.

 

For the 9 months I did his job I received absolutely nothing from the company and only a thank you after i complained about getting a pay rise ( which of course i did not get).

 

So i would like to know if I can demand or is my company obligated to pay me more if my manager goes on another long term absense.

 

If I do not receive anything can I refuse to do his job even though I am the 2nd in command?

I am happy to the job if he is on a short term sick leave ( 1 -2 weeks) or if he goes on holidays , but for more than that , I have had enough

 

 

Thank you in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not entitled to anything as it is not permanent so any extra reward is discretionary.

You may be able to refuse to do his job but that would depend on the wording of your job description. If the only difference in duties is a level of responsibility the refusing will be a breach of your terms of employment. More is not the same as higher level.

Having read your other posting I would suggest that you read your job description and then keep quiet as you arent exactly making friends an influencing people.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not have a job description as it was an internal job which it did not exist before. The difference in duties is more than just responsibility, I will do all the managing of everything including paperwork , projects and as a consequence will stall my current training to move up the ladder .

 

In regards to keeping quiet , of course I will not if I feel being mistreated , hence I ask for further advice.

Do you believe doing my manager's job long term in 2 occasions in the past and most likely a 3rd one now is fair?

 

Thank you for your advice in both posts

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd say if you want to move up the ladder do the cover well, wait until he's let go for illness, and Bob's your uncle.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The main point of my comment is more is not the same as higher so beware of making a grievance and then landing on your backside because it is covered by a job evaluation. Being asked to fill in for someone is not mistreatment.

The suggestion of waiting until you know how long this latest episode of absence is a good point, you could ask for your job to be re-evaluated to include the change in career path once it is clear the absence is going to be more than very short term.

But whatever you do dont go complaining to anyone that the current situation is not fair, they will think you are not motivated or interested in the higher post and appoint a new bod over you when the time comes.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...