Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
    • Unless I've got an incorrect copy of the relevant regulation: The PCN is only deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch "unless the contrary is proved" in which case date of delivery does matter (not just date of posting) and I would like clarification of the required standard of proof. It seems perhaps this hasn't been tested. Since post is now barcoded for the Post Office's own tracking purposes perhaps there is some way I can get that evidence from the Post Office...
    • I would say You should accept it - I HIGHLY doubt you will  be able to claim for letters at trial ans they’re offering you that, which is higher monetary value than interest.   Also they raise a good point, getting interest at anything above 4% is lucky these days, yes judges give it, but rarily above 4%   Also you might find depending on the judge  you don’t get some costs if you take it all the way over £7.40 when court woukdnt award letters costs and thus meaning their award would be less than evris offer which was made    Up to you though but the wait will be 3-4mo for a trial date at least
    • Hi Folks, Been 162 days! Just by way of update. Today I received a text from Opos Ltd so no doubt Capquest are renting the debt out to anybody who fancies a nibble. Safe to say I will not be responding.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

1st Stop Recoveries - Claimform old Uncle Buck PDL


Bailey14117
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2789 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Okay so you need to file and serve that WS and disclosures tomorrow...don't worry abut it being a few days late...as the claimants have also missed it.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Bailey - could you expand a little on the history of the debt? I see you mentioned in an earlier post that the loan amount was £150 plus one month's interest - can you confirm/clarify? Did you have many dealings with this Uncle Buck outfit? It also says in your opening post, in response to the question about why you ceased making payments, that you don't believe any payments have been made at all - can you expand a bit on this for us?

 

Sham

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a thought - have you logged into MCOL and checked the status of the claim? It also may be worth phoning the court to ask if they've paid the court fee?

 

Hopefully Andyorch will pop in later and confirm the above.

 

Hi, I have just logged into MCOL and the last thing put on is my defence. I don't see anything relating to any correspondence from the claimant or if the fee has been paid. Would I be able to see that?

Is it worth me calling up the court tomorrow to ask?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy's advice is to get on with your disclosure. If you phone up and ask, there's always a chance they'll spot that you've not complied with directions. Just get the WS and other documents together and off to the claimant and court ASAP, then you can phone the court the day before the hearing to check that it's still going ahead. I have a good feeling they won't turn up, but you never know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi shamrocker,

 

Yes I do recall a loan taken with them. I don't remember when exactly though and have no paperwork from back then.

If I can remember rightly I think I had a loan/s with them previously maybe only 1/2 and paid them back no problem then I got into a hole with payday loans and borrowed the £150 and was unable to pay back. I don't have any paperwork to back this up.

I was in financial difficulty but I dont know if I discussed it with them or not.

I'm sorry I cannot be more specific but it was a horrendous time and I have tried to forget about it all.

I know now that's not the best thing to do but just trying to be honest and get it sorted now.

I have got the template thanks and will do my best with it now.

Thank you all so much.

I have also read the other thread and am going to use the cover letter for the court from it.

I wil also be able to hand deliver it to the court tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive managed to do the below, would you mind taking a look?

 

IN THE county court AT halifax CLAIM NO:

 

BETWEEN:

1st Recoveries Claimant

-and-

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Defendant

 

WITNESS STATEMANT OF MR XXXXXXX

 

I.Mr XXXXXXXX the defendant in this claim make the following statement believing it to be true will state as follows:-

 

1. It is admitted that I have had an account with Uncle Buck in the past, I believe the debt was sold onto 1st Stop Recoveries LTD. I am unsure of the dates the account were opened.

 

2.It is denied that I entered into an agreement with 1st Stop Recoveries at any point.

 

3. Any issue with repayment must be legally enforced by way of Notice served under Sections 76(1) and 98(1) of the CCA1974 to terminate and recall any lending’s which 1st Stop Recoveries failed to comply with.

 

4. The assignment must be absolute.

The rights to be assigned must be wholly ascertainable and must not relate to part only of a debt.

The assignment must be in writing and signed under hand by the assignor.

Notice of the assignment must be received by the other party or parties for the assignment to take effect.

 

Again it is denied any Notice of Assignment was ever received.

 

5. It is admitted on receipt of the claim form I did request information pursuant to CPR 31.14

 

Namely to show how I entered into an agreement

Show how the claimant quantified the amount claimed

Show and evidence service of Notice served under Sections 76(1) and 98(1)

And to show how the claimant has legal right either under statute or equity to issue a claim in their name

 

Given that at this stage the claim is trackless and not allocated, CPR 31.14 does apply and the claimant is required to comply to validate and assist in verifying its claim. Although it is a civil request the court expects parties to communicate to try to narrow any differences.

 

Given that the claimant readily issued a claim based on documentation referred to within their particulars one would assume that they would be more than happy to comply to prove that any claim is valid and therefore eradicating any need to defend or proceed to trial.

 

I understand that this avoidance can be sanctioned when the question of costs arise as deemed as being unreasonable.

 

My defence stated that the original Creditor failed to serve Notice under Sections 76(1) and 98(1) and are therefore prevented from enforcing or requesting any relief.

 

6. Neither the claimant nor its Witness are in a position to assume that anything has been previously provided, nor is it their concern. They the claimant in this matter and will have to disclose all documentation relied upon as the basis of their claim at trial.As per CPR 16.5(4) it is expected that the claimant prove the allegation that any money is owed.

 

7. It is in my opinion that the claimants claim is fanciful contains no proof, and uncorroborated. Totally unaware of the details of debt they have purchased and expecting judgment/relief be granted, relying on the court to base its decision on assumption and basis of probabilities.

 

It is therefore submitted that the claimants be ordered by the court to quantify ,verify, substantiate and disclose all evidence relied upon and should the claimant fail to that their claim be struck out under CPR 3.4 as having no basis.

 

I believe that the facts stated in this Witness Statement are true.

 

Signed ……………….

 

Dated on the day ………………..2015

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, I really want to get this right and try what I can myself, or at least attempt to. You're help is invaluable and want to try do my bit. As per above, it's probably completely wrong but please feel free to edit of you can.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have also drafted the disclosure Lost as below:

 

Claim no: ABC12345

In the xxxxxxxx county court

 

 

 

Claimant: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xx

 

v

Defendant: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

_________________________ _________________________ ______________________

STANDARD DISCLOSURE LIST

_________________________ _________________________ ______________________

 

List of documents to be disclosed by the claimant:

 

1. CCA S,77/78 request letter sent to 1st Stop Recoveries Ltd.

2. CPR 31:14 request sent to 1st Stop Recoveries Ltd.

3. Receipt of postage of the above two requests.

4. Witness Statement 1 of the claimant.

 

 

YOUR NAME

 

Signed: _________________________ _______

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, great....that'll do for the purposes of showing that you tried to resolve the matter and they didn't respond.

 

I'm no expert on this stuff and any WS I write up will be far from perfect, but I can easily help you defeat a weak claim - while the claimant just tries to prey on your fear and ignorance of the process.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thank you.

 

I'm sure whatever you write up will be brilliant and far better than I could do!

 

That's exactly how I feel, and the amount of people that bury their heads in the sand in this situation and find it affects them for such a long time, it's just so sad! These companies are ridiculous!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it may be worthwhile to check first thing if they have paid the hearing fee...before you go to the expense of posting your documents off..it wont jeopardise your position.

 

" It states on the letter that the claimant must pay £55 for the case to be heard and if not paid by 8th June 2016 the case would be thrown out! "

 

Apologies for interrupting your flow Shammy :wink:

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy I was considering that. So it would be a matter of calling up the court and asking of the payment has been made by the claimant by the 8th June?

If it hasn't been made does that mean it won't go ahead?

Link to post
Share on other sites

8th June and not paid it should be struck out...which they will inform you of at the same time...if they have paid then you are prepared.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Andy, and no worries!

 

Here's my attempt. It's rather late after a long day, so my head is fried - therefore, it's pretty basic. It'll put across the main points to defeat them though. Check it over for any typos and change AA in the exhibits to your initials.

 

You'll need to put a copy of each exhibit after the statement with a cover page for each one - put the claim details at the top of the cover page and then Exhibit AA1, etc below.

 

Your disclosure list goes at the front. You need to send a copy off to the claimant (their solicitor, if they have once acting) and also to the Court.

 

Andy, feel free to offer some guidance or feedback.

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

IN THE COUNTY COURT AT XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CLAIM NO:

 

BETWEEN:

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (Claimant)

-and-

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (Defendant)

 

WITNESS STATEMANT OF MR/MRS/MISS/MS XXXXXXX

 

1. I, Mr/Mrs/Miss/Ms XXXXXXXX, the defendant in this claim make the following statement believing it to be true will state as follows:-

 

2. I have had some dealings with the company Uncle Buck Ltd. some years ago and know it to be a ‘payday loans company’ offering quick credit on a short-term basis. I have no recollection of there being monies owed to this company by me. Therefore, I deny the amount being claimed.

 

3. It is denied that I had an agreement with Uncle Buck Ltd. The Claimant has not supported their claim with an account reference or commencement date, so as to assist myself with identifying any agreement allegedly entered into.

 

4. Upon receiving the claim form, I immediately sent a Consumer Credit Act s.77/78 request to the Claimant [Exhibit AA1]. I do not have an account or agreement number, so used the claim reference number instead. To date, I have not received a response from the Claimant. I have proof of postage [Exhibit AA2] and receipt by the Claimant [Exhibit AA3].

 

5. I also sent a separate CPR 31:14 request letter to the Claimant [Exhibit AA4], for the purposes of:

 

- to show how I had entered into an agreement; and

- to show how the Claimant quantified the amount claimed for; and

- to show that, in the event of a breach, a valid Default Notice was issued; and

- to show how the Claimant has legal right either under statute or equity to issue

a claim in their name

 

I have proof of posting the letter [Exhibit AA5] and also receipt by the claimant [Exhibit AA6]. I have not received a response from the Claimant.

 

It is therefore submitted that the claimants be ordered by the court to quantify, verify, substantiate and disclose all evidence relied upon and should the claimant fail to that their claim be struck out under CPR 3.4 as having no basis.

 

I believe that the facts stated in this Witness Statement are true.

 

Signed ……………….

 

Dated on the day ………………..2016

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

Obviously, follow Andy's advice of phoning the Court first.

 

Sham

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's fab! Thank you! I really appreciate your time and effort at this time of night.

I'll call the court tomorrow and get it straight to them.

Will update you with what happens next.

Many thanks to you both once again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Points 2 & 3 need addressing you cant admit to having some " dealings " in 2 and then state in 3 that it is denied you had an agreement with Uncle Buck...I would amend it to the following....

 

2. I do not recall ever having any contractual relationship with Uncle Buck Ltd, which I understand to be a ‘payday loans company’ offering quick credit on a short-term basis. I have no recollection of there being monies owed or outstanding to this company. Therefore, I deny the alleged amount claimed.

 

3.The Claimant has failed to particularise its pleadings sufficiently with an account reference or commencement date, so as to assist myself with identifying any agreement allegedly entered into.

 

Rest is fine.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

How about point 2 I say I am aware of the company named Uncke Buck Ltd, which I understand....

 

The rest as per you have put on point 2, then I am not denying I have used their products but am denying I owe monies?

 

What do you both think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...