Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • go back and read what andyorch said in my above links about a DEED of assignment NOT being a Notice Of Assignment. its a general document for a portfolio of MANY debts they bought on a spreadsheet, NOT specifically relating to YOUR Agreement. but your was like all others, a single line in a spreadsheet.    the sheriff has specifically asked for the NOA and the Default Notice ...neither of which the fleecers have provided, merly a load of ole twaddle like trump does to divert attention away from those NOT being provided.   forget the stuff about LOP 1925 etc that a NOE is NOT applicable in scotland , the sheriff has asked for it..end of!!   bedtime reading particularly regarding default notice sec 87 https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?484300-Cabot-nolans-SPC-Claim-Old-Next-CAT-Debt(2-Viewing)-nbsp&p=5119630#post5119630   read from about post 70.   as for the written submission. i'll find an example later.   dx      
    • Plevin is not a calculation. its a refund of commission they got as they had a backhander of greater than 50% of the PPI sum paid for selling it on behalf of the insurance company that underwrote the PPI policy.   you are after reclaiming the PPI itself. and that is what all our PPI stuff is geared too.   have you still a copy of what you originally sent though as you don't even KNOW what plevin was , how could you have ever have asked for it.!!   pers i'd write back. (you seriously need to stop talking on the phone!!) stating quite clearly that you REJECT totally their refund under the Plevin Rules. my Claim was to reclaim the PPI a paid, not for a refund of your hidden commission!!   i give your 14 days to refund inline with the enclosed spreadsheet , else i will raise a complaint without further notice to the FOS.   please reply in Writing Only.            
    • Kim Kyeong Yeon developed his virus-destroying machine after his child injured herself. View the full article
    • not interested in silly letter   the CCa return please   dx  
    • This is interesting as I was not aware that there was a difference in the PPI claims/calculations.    Long story: I asked for this PPI reclaim over 5 years ago.  The Woolwich loan was taken out when I had a Woolwich current account.  The banking sort code for Woolwich was deleted off the banking system when Barclays inherited it hence they could not find my current account let alone the loan.    They had told me that I had provide proof of the loan as they could not locate it.  I did the FCA deadline search and it still was not located.    As this was the last resort, I had to go into the loft and found it by chance.  They changed the new reference number from the search and attached it to the old past reference number as the complaint was still on their system.    Even speaking to them about their calculations and the one I got from the on-line calculators, no one can explain the difference, they just keep saying that they cannot speak to the PPI calculations team, they have to email them!    Also I thought the Plevin paragraph was standard information.  So this is where the mystery lies,   I can reject the Plevin calculation and ask for calculations based on my actual PPI sums paid,   would this then be in line with your calculator?
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
       
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
       
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
       
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
       
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
       
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
       
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
       
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
       
        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
       
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
       
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
       
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
       
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
       
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
       
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
       
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
       
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

section 21 - periodic tenancy notice 2 months or 2 FULL CALENDARS?


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1700 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Landlord issued a section 21 today with two month's notice stating I must be out by 20th of April. I always thought two full calendar months were required for notice? Meaning I don't leave until 30th April? The original AST was from the 1st of the month.

 

Also the deposit hasn't been protected so technically the section 21 is void...?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi penfold

 

To be legal a Section 21 notice must:

 

be delivered in writing and give you at least two months' notice

be on a special form if you signed a new contract or a renewal agreement on or after 1 October 2015

Your landlord must also have followed certain rules for protecting your tenancy deposit and providing you with required tenancy deposit information.

 

Your landlord can't use a section 21 notice to evict you during the fixed term of your contract.

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/50/section/21

 

(b)the landlord or, in the case of joint landlords, at least one of them has given to the tenant not less than two months’ notice [F2in writing] stating that he requires possession of the dwelling-house.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
Landlord issued a section 21 today with two month's notice stating I must be out by 20th of April. I always thought two full calendar months were required for notice? Meaning I don't leave until 30th April? The original AST was from the 1st of the month.

 

Also the deposit hasn't been protected so technically the section 21 is void...?

 

Hi

The section 21 notice has to give two periods , which is the period of payment, so if you pay by calendar month then it is two calendar months etc.

When did he issue the notice , you say you are on a periodic tenancy, so when did the AST end ?

 

You are correct in that he should have given you a copy of the security deposit registration document, if he did not the judge will not grant the possession order, the notice has to be given before the section 21 is sent. There should also be mention of the gas safety tests.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, bear with me I am a single mother with 3 kids.

 

The AST began 1st July 2014 and was 6 months long, since then it has been rolling.

 

Notice for me to leave has been stapled to the notice to seek posession. There is a gas safety certificate, how legit the guy was who undertook that task I'm not sure, was some random guy with no credentials.

 

So you state the notice period has to be of two paying periods, well I'm reading on other sites that the notice may be two months exact from the day of notice issued. I do indeed pay by calendar month, however. Still confused.

Edited by penfold66
Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi, bear with me I am a single mother with 3 kids.

 

The AST began 1st July 2014 and was 6 months long, since then it has been rolling.

 

Notice for me to leave has been stapled to the notice to seek posession. There is a gas safety certificate, how legit the guy was who undertook that task I'm not sure, was some random guy with no credentials.

 

So you state the notice period has to be of two paying periods, well I'm reading on other sites that the notice may be two months exact from the day of notice issued. I do indeed pay by calendar month, however. Still confused.

 

Its ok your notice will be two months then(calendar months). Did you receive a copy of the security deposit notice before the sectin 21 was issued ?

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

No there's no TPS at all. He only asked for £300 deposit (didn't go through an agent) and said he only required it in case the dogs damage anything. I recently reminded him of this in a text message and he responded that it wasn't a deposit it was a fee so as I could have my two dogs there. I disputed this saying he's lying and he said again via text that I can have the £300 back if there's no damage once I've left. Local help says that this alone is him admitting he took £300 in deposit payment, plus have bank statments to prove it. But like I say I don't think he's even aware of TPS even though the notice he issued me himself states as much quite plainly on the first page lol.

 

Also as I said the notice states I must be gone by the 20th so legally it should be the 30th, yes?

Link to post
Share on other sites
No there's no TPS at all. He only asked for £300 deposit (didn't go through an agent) and said he only required it in case the dogs damage anything. I recently reminded him of this in a text message and he responded that it wasn't a deposit it was a fee so as I could have my two dogs there. I disputed this saying he's lying and he said again via text that I can have the £300 back if there's no damage once I've left. Local help says that this alone is him admitting he took £300 in deposit payment, plus have bank statments to prove it. But like I say I don't think he's even aware of TPS even though the notice he issued me himself states as much quite plainly on the first page lol.

 

Also as I said the notice states I must be gone by the 20th so legally it should be the 30th, yes?

 

Sounds decidedly dodgy to me, all deposits must be entered onto a government protection scheme since 2007. deposits are for damage to proerty anyway, I cannot se the difference between that and what he is discribing. Did you get any kind of reciept when he took the money ?

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

In any case he cannot just make you leave when the notice expires, he has to apply to the court, for a repossession order, pay £280 when you get notice form the court you have a further two weeks to enter a defence, before he can apply to the court for a repossession order. then he has to enforce it.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you do not wish to leave just yet, say nothing more to the LL.

In order to take it further,he will then have to issue a court summons..... That is when you tell the judge about the deposit, and the non protection... This invalidates the section 21, and the LL then has to either give the deposit back straight away, or protect it. then LL has to issue the section 21 again, and the dates all have to match up to the AST rental period. Then he has to issue the court summons again, and if everything is then in order the Judge must issue an eviction notice. Even then if you do not move out by the eviction notice date the LL has to go back to the court and instruct the bailiff to evict you, this could take up to 2-4 weeks to happen.

 

If you do wish to leave soonest, just pack up and go before the 20th.

 

If you want to drag it out, do not tell the LL and make it easy for him....

I am not a solicitor :!::!:

 

Most of my knowledge came from this site :-D:-D

 

If I have been helpful in any way at all .............. Please click my star..... :-(:-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes your moving out by date will be the 30th April, as that's 2 clear calendar months from your T date of the 1st. The LL needs to reissue the Section 21 with the correct dates on it for it to legal. (as per Andy post).

 

And like DB says, if you have not found another property to move into by this date, you can stay where you are until the LL issues Court proceedings for eviction.

 

As for your deposit, it was your LL responsibility to place said deposit in a DPS scheme & give you copies of the paperwork for it. As he has not done so, the £300 should be returned in full back to you. Regardless of any claims he may make re damage/animals.

 

As the deposit was not protected, you could make a claim. More info here;

 

http://m.england.shelter.org.uk/get_advice/tenancy_deposits/getting_your_deposit_back/tenancy_deposit_compensation_claims

 

https://www.gov.uk/tenancy-deposit-protection/if-your-landlord-doesnt-protect-your-deposit

 

So do keep the texts & your payment proof for the £300 you paid..

 

I would, in your case suggest you go to your local Council Housing office & speak to them with regards to the above & any other issue you may have with the LL.

 

Good luck!

I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every single minute of it!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wrong RT, a LL can serve a valid s21 at any time during SPT that expires exactly 2 cal months from date of Service, it does not have to expire at end of a rental period!

If s21 was hand-delivered on 21st Feb it will expire on 20th April, after which LL can seek Court Repo Order, so OP should vacate on/by 2oth April to avoid risk of LL requesting Judge to apply cost of hearing (£280) to T.

 

 

@penfold, how & when was s21 delivered? Also bank statement showing debit of £300 does not prove it was a deposit, only a written receipt can do that.

I am not saying you MUST vacate by 20th April but you should be aware of possible extra costs that could apply if you do not. It could take LL until mid June to legally evict you, even if s21 is valid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He delivered it himself today, through letterbox, I wasn't in.

 

Ok so if it's two months from date of notice served, then LL expects me to pay last month's rent then rely on on him repaying 10 days of that when I leave plus the £300? Do you advise that I don't pay any further rent? Because I can bet my bottom dollar he won't be paying back anything and I don't have the funds to take him to court, it's better for me that I'm taken to court by him to recover fund rather than vice versa. It's a pretty unfair game the LL v Tenant business it seems.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Esp for the LL.

 

 

No I don't advise withholding any rent, as s21 does not terminate Tenancy and full rent is due on rent day. Also it does not absolve you from need to serve valid NTQ to expire on last day of next full rental period. So you could post valid, irrevocable NTQ 1st Class on Mon (deemed served Wed) to expire on last day of March (move out day) so next (last) months rent is not affected, or you could serve it 2nd Mar to expire last day of April and hope LL has not got a hearing date in intervening 10 days.

Your binding NTG for April should give th LL some confidence and saving him the up front hearing fee of £280 until he applies for a later hearing on 1st May, if you have not vacated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

does the £300 deposit for whatever appear in the contract anywhere, usually states what the rent is and if any deposit paid? ( proof ).

If deposit not protected, the S21 is invalid and you can just ignore it.

also you can sue for non protection, but can get complicated if not dealt with by judge dealing with the eviction notice.

M51 correct S21 can be issued at any time and is two months notice from any time once gone periodic. ( if valid that is ).

 

 

however, it looks like he wants you out, so start looking, but don't panic you will have a bit of time and suggest you stay until you find somewhere suitable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice so far.

 

So I received a text from LL tonight stating as I haven't responded to any of his messages he is going to be doing a house check. Now I'm aware to tell him he needs to give 24hrs notice IN WRITING, however there are cOmplications to this. What if he says he will be round at say 5pm but doesn't arrive til 6pm? What if I've had to go out after 5pm and he enters my home without me knowing? Wht if he says in his 24hr notice, he will "be round at some point tomorro after noon..."? and so on?

 

And onto the "check" itself. Does he have the right to examine every single room or can do I reserve the right to say "no my bedroom is private?"

Edited by penfold66
Link to post
Share on other sites

yes LL can apply to council for payment, however they will only comply if he can show you have not been paying the rent direct him direct.

As for an inspection, he can only 'inspect' at a time/date to suit you! by agreement, however you must be reasonable.

It is the LL property and has every right to look into every room.

As for unauthorized entry, you can change the locks so that is not possible. ( perfectly legal ), but tell LL before you do it; just courtesy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so today LL was due to inspect the property. Upon entry this afternoon he immediately asked why he hasn't recevied his rent today. He had already texted me asking why way earlier this morning, and I'd replied stating my benefits have been suspended due to investigation. Despite this he said "right first of all I wanna know....". My response was "no u are here to do an inspection please undertake that or I will call the police." He refused to carry it out before trying to force me to talk so I phoned the police.

 

Long and short of it, the police arrived half hour after they'd gone (him and his wife). They stated LL's are allowed to enter their own house WHENEVER THEY FEEL LIKE IT IS NOT A CRIMINCAL OFFENCE and that it is a civil matter only. I said to the officer "so you're telling me any LL can simply enter his own property regardless of tenants any time of the day or night and you can't make him leave due to him committing an offence?" Their response was that is correct. Unless there is a breach of the peace or something any LL can enter any of their homes as they please and not budge. I was astounded and felt like suggesting the officer was clueless about law. But maybe they were right? I mentioned forums like this and law pages etc and they simply said yes you will be told by people online what the law is and they're all wrong.

 

Furthermore, the LL said he will be doing another check on the first of next month, as I've read elsewhere apparently law states he can only enter to do urgent repairs. My god WHAT IS THE LAW???????????

Link to post
Share on other sites

LL gave due Notice, attended as arranged and you let him in to HIS property (your temp home). No Breach of the Peace occurred so Police not interested.

However, you are in Breach of Contract (civil offence). It is your resp to pay full rent by due date, so not the Council's fault that you got 'sanctioned'.

 

 

No sensible LL would enter their property at any time without due Notice/invitation, unless in an emergency or to secure his property.

 

 

Much of LL&T Law is based on Common/Civil. most of which is not Criminal Law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed so it would seem. I am going to buy a house, rent it out then proceed to let myself in at 3am to watch tv as it's perfectly legal. Damn the rights I will have as a LL can't wait :whoo:

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...