Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Marston- Enforcement Order with no prior notice E.ON CCJ


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2942 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 135
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes the debt is paid but the action to recovering the fees and addressing the ccj is ongoing.

 

Ah...many thanks WD.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, just to be clear,

I have never been threatened by bailiffs before and was frightened by the idea of having to hide our cars and lock up our assets etc- as we have done absolutely nothing wrong.

 

 

Therefore I have paid off the bill in full

-as I would have done had I been given the opportunity 6 weeks ago when Eon initiated the action (without informing me).

 

 

If even one letter/email or phone call had informed me of their intentions,

I would have paid instantly.

 

I will definitely be pursuing the set aside,

looking to have my credit score repaired

and for the recovery of the £1100 of fees that were added on to the balance

between December and January.

 

 

All help with the set aside gratefully received.

 

Best

MB

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you could get the claimant to agree to set aside the judgement yes a good idea

 

 

think they have to instigate that mind..not you ..not 100% sure

await the team to respond.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My interpretation of things is thus:

 

I should write a letter to Eon confirming that I paid the amount in full within 2 business days of having any knowledge of it. Remind them that they used the wrong address to take action and that had I known I would have paid before any such action was taken. Ask if they will have the CCJ set aside and sweeten the deal by telling them if they have it set aside I will not pursue them for the additional fees that they added (over £1000).

 

Worth a try or waste of time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

My interpretation of things is thus:

 

I should write a letter to Eon confirming that I paid the amount in full within 2 business days of having any knowledge of it. Remind them that they used the wrong address to take action and that had I known I would have paid before any such action was taken. Ask if they will have the CCJ set aside and sweeten the deal by telling them if they have it set aside I will not pursue them for the additional fees that they added (over £1000).

 

Worth a try or waste of time?

 

Hi MeeBroke

 

Just a quick heads up. If you write to us please use the address on the PM I sent you the other day. Will speed things up a bit.

 

Thanks.

 

Malc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

so I wrote to the Court requesting all documentation concerning this case, explaining that Eon had used the wrong address and that none of the documents ever reached me.

 

I received a letter back from the Court informing me that they have none of the documents as the whole thing was 'done online'?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

so I wrote to the Court requesting all documentation concerning this case, explaining that Eon had used the wrong address and that none of the documents ever reached me.

 

I received a letter back from the Court informing me that they have none of the documents as the whole thing was 'done online'?

 

It is the creditor ie; Eon you need to contact and when doing so you need to submit an SAR (subject access request). This will give you a detailed report of all communications including any recorded calls and screen shots of your ongoing account at the time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is the creditor ie; Eon you need to contact and when doing so you need to submit an SAR (subject access request). This will give you a detailed report of all communications including any recorded calls and screen shots of your ongoing account at the time.

 

Thanks WD. This simply gets more and more incredible. So, a company like this can use any old street address to sue you, even though they are in possession of ALL of your current contact details- and the only way you discover this has all happened and they have managed to get a court judgement against you- is that they contact you at your CURRENT address to let you know it has happened! At this stage, the only one holding any document in regards to this action is the offender themselves!

 

Sorry for the rant but this beggars belief.

 

Should I SAR them before I write to them asking them for an agreement to set aside? I was just about to post that letter today.

 

Thanks MB

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks WD. This simply gets more and more incredible. So, a company like this can use any old street address to sue you, even though they are in possession of ALL of your current contact details- and the only way you discover this has all happened and they have managed to get a court judgement against you- is that they contact you at your CURRENT address to let you know it has happened! At this stage, the only one holding any document in regards to this action is the offender themselves!

 

Sorry for the rant but this beggars belief.

 

Should I SAR them before I write to them asking them for an agreement to set aside? I was just about to post that letter today.

 

Thanks MB

I agree they are an utter disgrace. It doesn't matter if you send the letter trying to get them to agree a settlement first. This SAR will be needed if they refuse to settle and you find yourself back at ground zero and since they have 40 days to reply in...best sent sooner rather than later.

By the way you will need to send £10 cheque or postal order for the SAR and send always by signed for/recorded post.

 

Courts will look at the time taken from when you first became aware of all this to when you apply for set aside, so keep an eye on the clock (so to speak), don't leave it to long. There is always a lag between application being made and a hearing date being set. In the worse case scenario and the hearing arrives before they reply to SAR you can ask the Court to adjourn until that info is with you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Court are being a little evasive. Did you ask for details of what address they posted out to & the dates this was all done. Even using the online version the Court still have to send you documentation about the Claim and should also have sent you the Judgment result.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I just check my understanding on things? Can Eon request that the judgement be set aside without me making an application to the court? I may have misunderstood things here as the reason I was writing to Eon was to try and achieve this.

 

I'm now starting to to wonder if I have to make the application no matter what?

Link to post
Share on other sites

An application must be made either by you or the Judgment Creditor (if in agreement)..normally by consent order.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I just check my understanding on things? Can Eon request that the judgement be set aside without me making an application to the court? I may have misunderstood things here as the reason I was writing to Eon was to try and achieve this.

 

I'm now starting to to wonder if I have to make the application no matter what?

 

In all honesty I have never come across the situation whereby the claimant has on request set aside a ccj but since you got the info from a solicitor, he/she is better placed than I am.to ascertain if such an avenue is open to you.

 

I am familiar with the process of the debtor having paid the amount adjudged within one month of judgment being made being able to seek removal of it from the register. and that paying the ccj after the month deadline it is possible to obtain a certificate of satisfaction which marks the debt satisfied on the register but, it will still be visible to anyone doing a credit check.

 

I have always understood the defendant undertaking the set aside process is the only way to have a judgment overturned but I would be delighted to be proven wrong on that, if it means I and others can learn from it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In all honesty I have never come across the situation whereby the claimant has on request set aside a ccj but since you got the info from a solicitor, he/she is better placed than I am.to ascertain if such an avenue is open to you.

 

I am familiar with the process of the debtor having paid the amount adjudged within one month of judgment being made being able to seek removal of it from the register. and that paying the ccj after the month deadline it is possible to obtain a certificate of satisfaction which marks the debt satisfied on the register but, it will still be visible to anyone doing a credit check.

 

I have always understood the defendant undertaking the set aside process is the only way to have a judgment overturned but I would be delighted to be proven wrong on that, if it means I and others can learn from it.

 

Its quite common practice WD if you have a read in the financial legal issues forum...but you have to make it worth their while.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its quite common practice WD if you have a read in the financial legal issues forum...but you have to make it worth their while.

 

Andy

Then I am delighted to be proven wrong :-D The defendant in this matter is roughly £1000 out of pocket and to drop a claim for that would well be worth Eon's while, don't you think ?? I will follow your advice and read the financial legal issues forum.

 

Having been in a similar situation myself I opted to go for set aside and recovered every unfair penny taken from me...£4k+:whoo:

Link to post
Share on other sites

An application must be made either by you or the Judgment Creditor (if in agreement)..normally by consent order.

 

Andy

 

Thanks Andy, so how does the consent order get handled? Should my first contact by letter include a drafted consent order, asking them to agree it?

 

MB

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually using good old Google, I think I've got the gist of things now.

 

 

I'm going to write to Eon explaining that I never received any of their correspondence in regards to the court action.

 

 

I am going to inform them that I would have paid had I received any of this correspondence.

 

 

I am going to inform them that I paid in full within 2 working days of receiving the order.

 

 

I am going to ask them to consent to having the CCJ set aside.

 

 

I am going to included a simple draft consent order for them to sign.

 

 

Something like this:

UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE PARTIES

 

[Meebroke and ADDRESS previously of OLD ADDRESS]

 

[EON AND ADDRESS]

 

 

BY CONSENT

IT IS ORDERED THAT

 

1. The proceedings herein be stayed on the terms set out in the Schedule.

 

2. Meebroke has prior to the date of this order paid to Eon the sum of £xxxx pounds receipt of which Marston acknowledges.

 

3. The County Court Judgement held for MeeBroke under claim number xxxxx be removed and deleted from public record.

4. No order as to costs.

 

Signed

________________

 

 

 

Then, assuming they sign and return it, I file the application for set aside with the court and include this doc.

 

 

Have I got all of that right?

 

Thanks

MB

Link to post
Share on other sites

It normal practice that the Claimant drafts the consent MB...you just suggest plant the idea.

 

The above is the order only (1&4) it will need a schedule (2&3)....which is attached to the above.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...