Jump to content


Cabot/weightmans claim form - old online car finance already subject to a CCJ in 2008?


Me-jules7
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2961 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

if you don't find ref to the CCJ yes ofcourse

we'll help on that side

 

concentrate on finding written proof of the CCJ

old credit file

old letter

anything written.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was the a original judgement for return of goods only

or was there a judgement for monies as well?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

cannot locate any other paperwork apart from the original default notice.

 

I need to submit my defence today before 4pm.

 

I have no idea how to word this so any help would be gratefully received

 

Many Thanks

J

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?438186-Claim-form-Cabot-for-Old-Lloyds-TSB-Loan

 

like post 37

 

 

copy it back here first mind to get it checked

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Particulars of Claim:

1. The defendant entered into a credit agreement described by the creditor as ONLINE FINANCE having account number 1......

2.The claimant, a UK limited companywith company reg no 3757424 is the assignee and legal owner of all rights previously enjoyed by the original creditor in respect of the account.

3. The defendant is indebted to the claimant in the respect of the account in the sum of 799.88

4.the claimant claims the said sum of 799.88 plus costs.

 

Account defaulted 27 september 2006 - the cost detailed on the letter from online finance are made up of £217 of letter charges and auction fee's of the car £561.65 giving a total of £779.15 - we were never made aware that them taking the car back would result in an auction cost to us and the letter fee's we were advised would be wiped of the account.

 

Proposed defense

 

1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

2. Paragraph 1 is noted and accepted I have in the past had financial dealings with Online Finance.I do not recall the precise details or agreement and have sought verification from the claimant who is unable to comply.

 

3. Paragraph 2 is denied I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served last year from either the Claimant or Cabot Financial UK Ltd

 

4.It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant,

the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of assignment/balance/breach requested by CPR 31. 14,and remains in default of my section 77 request, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

© show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

5. On receipt of this claim I requested by way of a CPR 31.14 request and a section 77/78 request, copies of the documents referred to within the Claimants particulars to establish what the claim is for.

To date the Claimant has failed to comply to my section 77/78 request and their solicitors, Weightmans, having received no documentation from either.

 

6. As per Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

7. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82 A of the consumer crediticon Act 1974.

Link to post
Share on other sites

red bits above

 

 

although you say earlier it was HP

they have not indicated what it was

other than a credit agreement

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sadly means nothing as you continued to pay

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, I have submitted the defence will wait and see what happens next.

 

I still havent had the CCA or CPR stuff back just the letter from weightmans saying they've requested judgement when I still had over a week left to submit.

 

Thanks for your help will keep posted.

 

J:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...