Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Minor Speeding Tickets received months later!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2981 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am shocked to find I received 2 speeding tickets this morning (16-02-16).

 

1) Dated 02-10-15 doing 36 mph in a 30 mile road

2) Dated 11-12-15 doing 35 mph in a 30 mile road.

 

Since its 16 February 2016 the first ticket is over 4 months old. Obviously I have no recollection dating back that far.

 

The "speeds" are so minor over the limit and I would welcome any advice on whether it it possible to challenge these tickets fairly.

 

Amazingly the only memory I have of this particular road is being stuck in between lorries in traffic jams where a 10 min drive would take you up to an hour - seems rather strange and weird, unless a gap appeared and I moved???

 

 

On the letter its says pay £100 fine and then talks about a speeding course does it mean do one or the other or are you supposed to do both.

 

Never had a speeding ticket before so quite shocked.

 

Any advice welcome.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

the speed over the limit is not 'minor'

prob a village or built up area on a major road.

 

 

so the limit is there for a reason. Schools p'haps or general public safety?

 

 

I believe its an either or offence

either take the points or do an awareness course ?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the speed over the limit is not 'minor'

prob a village or built up area on a major road.

 

 

so the limit is there for a reason. Schools p'haps or general public safety?

 

 

I believe its an either or offence

either take the points or do an awareness course ?

Aren't tickets supposed to be issued within a certain time frame after the offence has occurred.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The police must serve an NIP within 14 days of the alleged speeding offence, but there are some circumstances in which the notice will still stand even if it's served later than this, for example:

 

if extra time is needed for the police to act with 'reasonable diligence' to find out who the registered keeper is and how to contact them; or

if the delay was the driver’s fault, for example because they have not told the DVLA of a recent change of address.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How long the police have to issue a speeding notice

 

The police must serve an NIP within 14 days of the alleged speeding offence, but there are some circumstances in which the notice will still stand even if it's served later than this, for example:

 

  • if extra time is needed for the police to act with 'reasonable diligence' to find out who the registered keeper is and how to contact them; or
  • if the delay was the driver’s fault, for example because they have not told the DVLA of a recent change of address.

http://www.which.co.uk/cars/driving/driving-advice/dealing-with-speeding-tickets/speeding-fines-your-rights/

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

prob also linked to the dvla not updating the address too

re this thread by the op

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?455380-Shock-traffic-Ticket-Enforcers-want-£500

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am shocked to find I received 2 speeding tickets this morning (16-02-16).

 

1) Dated 02-10-15 doing 36 mph in a 30 mile road

2) Dated 11-12-15 doing 35 mph in a 30 mile road.

 

Since its 16 February 2016 the first ticket is over 4 months old. Obviously I have no recollection dating back that far.

 

The "speeds" are so minor over the limit and I would welcome any advice on whether it it possible to challenge these tickets fairly.

 

Amazingly the only memory I have of this particular road is being stuck in between lorries in traffic jams where a 10 min drive would take you up to an hour - seems rather strange and weird, unless a gap appeared and I moved???

 

 

On the letter its says pay £100 fine and then talks about a speeding course does it mean do one or the other or are you supposed to do both.

 

Never had a speeding ticket before so quite shocked.

 

Any advice welcome.

 

Thanks

 

What proof is provided ?

 

You can opt to go to court to defend, if there is no reason for delayed notification and no proof is provided.

 

Remember that if you accept fine/points or driver awareness course to advise your Insurers. Check your policy about when they expect you to notify them. Don't leave it until renewal, forget about it and let the insurance auto renew.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No proof is provided which I find quite strange, I thought they sent pictures out these days???

 

I thought they mostly took pictures these days, but it might just have been a hand held speed device. Some Police forces apparently allow private contractors to do this work. There is a Youtube video of someone trying to highlight this issue and the contractor called the Police.

 

Why the delay in notification ?

 

Was your address with DVLA out of date ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some useful things to note:

 

1. If the vehicle is not registered to you personally because it is a company vehicle or you have car finance on the car, it is possible (likely) the notice was sent to the "Registered Keeper" within 14 days and so the 14 day defence would not apply to you.

 

2. If you are the registered keeper but you have failed to update the DVLA with the correct address for the vehicle, the 14 day defence will not apply.

 

3. You can only attend a speed awareness course once in any 3 year period and for one matter. (By far the more preferable option if you are eligible although it can be a dull 4 hours!)

 

4. There is no requirement for the police to disclose any evidence prior to proceedings being issued. Most constabularies will disclose photos but they are under no obligation to do so.

Edited by honeybee13
Removing invitation to get in touch.
Link to post
Share on other sites

the speed awareness course is discretionary and often only a number of courses offered in a particular time scale so even if you opted for that you can still get clobbered with the fine and points instead.

 

You can fight this but risk doubling the points and the fine can go up a lot.

 

 

Generally the letter will say that your vehicle was recorded as doing 35mph at a particular place and time so you will know if it is a fixed camera or other device.

 

Your constabulary will have a traffic technical bod who can look into why the delay and the other bits and they can be helpful or not, depending on how they view the world so it may be worth a phone call.

 

However, if you know more about these events than you are letting on you should consider whether it is worth the gamble or just take the hit and pay up

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...