Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Dear All,   BN - Thank you for your comments.    My wife had prepared the relevant notice to the court and rather than spending time redacting I am sending it as PM to the contributors to this thread. It covers everything we have been discussing and is in line with  your comments and our discussions.   For the benefit of readers oif CAG I will redact and post it later as we have pressing family medical matters to attend to.    Warm regards BF  
    • Maybe have a third chamber, The Peoples' House 😃
    • Thanks for the images. It's shocking. This more than ever reinforces my view that you should take this to court. The number of people they must be fobbing off with this three months story is incredible – and they need pulling into line. If you simply complain to the CEO then they may sort out your problems – but the rest of it will go on as usual. They need something very serious here. In fact, I would think about suing them for £200 because I think that once they realise about the mistake they are making, they will be extremely anxious not to go to court. On the basis of this, I'm afraid I don't think I would even alert the CEO. I would send a letter of claim which will probably simply be seen by drones – and then issue the papers. I think you have an easy win on this case. Also, once they realise that they are dealing with a court case, they will look at the whole situation more carefully and they will probably sort out all of the problems at the same time. If they don't, then these two have laid down your marker and they will know that you're not mucking around and they will take you seriously.
    • These are the two incidents from Virgin Chat where their Live chat has informed me of the 'only 3 months' decision.... 15 April was the date they acknowledged receipt of my SAR. Apparently anything from before that date can't be included!
    • You could try both routes at the same time. Send your letter of claim by email to the CEO email address. Confirmed by letter. That way you have communicated with the CEO – but given a very definite deadline and a very definite promise as to what will happen if they don't comply. Then on day 15 sent the claim. Don't make a threat of legal action if you don't intend to carry it out. Don't bluff – but it is very easy to do
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
       
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
       
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
       
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
       
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
       
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
       
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
       
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
       
        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
       
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
       
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
       
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
       
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
       
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
       
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
       
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
       
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

Council tax attachment of earnings have they taken too much?


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1713 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I have just received 2 attachments of earnings for old council tax debt. One is for £1070 the other £72.50.

My monthly take home pay is usually around £1800 and this month I have been paid £1300. I have been on an online calculator and found out that they should have had £317 for the first order so with this takeb off I would have been paid £1483, even if the entire amount of the second order was deducted I would have been paid £1411.50.

I called them and they even said that I shouldn't have paid this much but in a word tough! Is there anything I can do.

I was expecting maybe £300 and budgeted accordingly but this has left me very short and if they do the same again next month I don't know how we are going to manage. Surely if the law says 17% for each order thereference must be something I can do? Please help back to work tomorrow and am very worried

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take a read of the following thread slgsue

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?459754-Council-tax-attachment-of-earnings(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

May assist you until further advice comes along.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
Take a read of the following thread slgsue

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?459754-Council-tax-attachment-of-earnings(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

May assist you until further advice comes along.

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

Thanks Andy I read the thread first but couldn't see the answer to my question. Fortunately or unfortunately depending on how you see it I know how much they are going to take as they have done so. I had based my budget on all the info I could gather and just about found a way to get by but with the extra they seem to have taken I literally feel sick which is why I want to know if I can appeal or do anything about the amount as it is far greater than 17% :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at the website for DEA its states its your employers responsibility to apply the correct amount of deduction based on your net earnings.

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/453704/dea-guide-for-employers.pdf

 

This also show the guidelines on protected income.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
I have just received 2 attachments of earnings for old council tax debt. One is for £1070 the other £72.50.

 

My monthly take home pay is usually around £1800 and this month I have been paid £1300. I have been on an online calculator and found out that they should have had £317 for the first order so with this takeb off I would have been paid £1483, even if the entire amount of the second order was deducted I would have been paid £1411.50.

 

I was expecting maybe £300 and budgeted accordingly but this has left me very short and if they do the same again next month I don't know how we are going to manage. Surely if the law says 17% for each order thereference must be something I can do? Please help back to work tomorrow and am very worried

 

Blimey....you do have a problem. This is all down to the 2nd Attachment of Earnings Order for £72.50.

 

A maximum of two AOE's can be set up but the calculations that I have been using shows the following:

 

First Attachment: £306.00

 

2nd Attachment £253.98

 

Total £559.98.

 

Where your problems seem to have arisen, is because of the 2nd Liability Order of £72.

 

Personally, I would suggest that you PAY the debt of £72 to clear that Liability Order and speak to the council to get them to look at adjusting the AOE so that you only have ONE attachment for £1070.

 

I have then calculated that your deduction for the one remaining Liability Order should be £306 per month.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Looking at the website for DEA its states its your employers responsibility to apply the correct amount of deduction based on your net earnings.

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/453704/dea-guide-for-employers.pdf

 

This also show the guidelines on protected income.

 

Andy

 

I think that you will find Andy that the above guidance is in relation to Direct Earnings Attachments (DEAs) which are not the same as Attachment of Earning for council tax arrears.

 

DEA's are set up to recover monies due to the Department for Work and Pensions. These could consist of benefit overpayments, overpayments for housing benefit etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Blimey....you do have a problem. This is all down to the 2nd Attachment of Earnings Order for £72.50.

 

A maximum of two AOE's can be set up but the calculations that I have been using shows the following:

 

First Attachment: £306.00

 

2nd Attachment £253.98

 

Total £559.98.

 

Where your problems seem to have arisen, is because of the 2nd Liability Order of £72.

 

Personally, I would suggest that you PAY the debt of £72 to clear that Liability Order and speak to the council to get them to look at adjusting the AOE so that you only have ONE attachment for £1070.

 

I have then calculated that your deduction for the one remaining Liability Order should be £306 per month.

 

Thank you I had a feeling that it was the 2nd one causing the issue. I should have my wage slip tomorrow and am guessing that the 2nd aoe has been paid in full now plus some!

If this is the case can I apply to get this overpayment back and the 2nd aoe stopped as it is now clear? Would I contact the LA for this?

Thanks again your replies have given me some hope!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not altogether certain that the deduction is apportioned against each Liability Order. You really do need to check this (and quite soon as well as the end of the month is only two weeks away).

 

Like you, I would be interested to know how the payments have been allocated on your wage slip. Please do post back as this is a subject that I have a lot of interest in.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I think that you will find Andy that the above guidance is in relation to Direct Earnings Attachments (DEAs) which are not the same as Attachment of Earning for council tax arrears.

 

DEA's are set up to recover monies due to the Department for Work and Pensions. These could consist of benefit overpayments, overpayments for housing benefit etc.

 

Many thanks for dropping in BA and thanks for clarifying that point ...DEA,s are only used for deductions from JSA, ESA and IS, but not from DLA, PIP or AA. or Housing Benefit.

 

AoE only used by the council to reclaim CT.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your employer has definitely made a mistake. They should have deducted as required for the first order but only deduct £72.50 for the second order, you cannot deduct more than the value of the order.

 

Check if your employer has actually sent the money to the council (we do it a couple of weeks after payroll) - they have 18 days to send the payment after deduction - they may still be able to credit back the overpayment to you. If it gets to the council they will allocate the overpayment on the £72.50 order to the first order :( and you won't get it back.....

 

Check with your payroll department - now! get them to read the rules for deducting orders too.........

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all. I will certainly be checking when I receive my wage slip.

If I am right and they have paid over the odds from the 2nd order which knowing my luck I will not see again, how does this order get stopped? Do the council notify my employer that only 1 order now needs paying or do I have to do anything? I suppose looking at it in a positive way at least by April the whole thing will be done 😕

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your employer hasn't sent the money to the council yet then ask them to pay you the overpayment - this means one order will be finished and they should only deduct for the larger order going forward.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Your employer has definitely made a mistake. They should have deducted as required for the first order but only deduct £72.50 for the second order, you cannot deduct more than the value of the order.

 

Check if your employer has actually sent the money to the council (we do it a couple of weeks after payroll) - they have 18 days to send the payment after deduction - they may still be able to credit back the overpayment to you. If it gets to the council they will allocate the overpayment on the £72.50 order to the first order :( and you won't get it back.....

 

Check with your payroll department - now! get them to read the rules for deducting orders too.........

 

WOW !!!

 

Excellent reply Ell-enn.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...