Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

BAYV turn up on doorstep to take back bed and tv


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2989 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This thread was made back in Oct 2011, its great op got sorted,

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?309656-Police-arrest-customer-to-allow-Buy-As-You-View-to-seize-goods(2-Viewing)-nbsp

 

But has buy as you view changed any in Feb 2016?

 

No.

 

My Daughter is a single parent and took out a tv and bed for her 5 year old son, she is on benefits,

I believe she has had the items around 7-8 months never missing a payment, until now,

 

Today she had Buy as you view people at her door trying to force their way in to take away TV and bed,

 

She refused to let them, in they said if you refuse we will just go away and get the POLICE

and they will make you lets us in and take stuff away.

 

Surely this can't be legal to use intimidation and threats of Police forcing their way in?

 

Is this buy as you views new training for 2016.

 

I told my daughter as soon as they return to get it all on camera phone,

and it will be on youtube

and shared with every consumer forum I can find.

 

Could someone Kindly give me a number for their head office and contact name?

 

I really want to speak to thm about this.

Edited by good4me
Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you really think Head Office care? it's likely in their training! too widespread to be anything but.

 

Best bet is to go to the Press, or send an email to Head Office, stating whats occured, listing the email contact details of the many newspapers your going to be sending the story too, complete with photo's of terrified single mum and adorable, but terrified child, unless they have a solution in the next 3 days.

 

Like forgetting the debt, and sending a 42" tv as compensation for distress,

as the distress to their reputation and business likely to be caused is going to be far more expensive,

 

especially when people began saying hang on,

this happened to me and begin reporting it to Police,

and people who have HAD the police believe the rubbish and force entry

contact professional standards, and report their force, and the police in turn,

who will have the incidents in their notebooks, unless they knew they were behaving illegally,

 

 

easily proven, as a page may be missing from their notebook at the time,

but their equipment and vehicles has GPS Tracking showing where they were

..... so the Police start arresting the companies staff for misleading police officers,

 

 

misrepresenting themselves as Bailiffs (I bet thats what coppers will claim they did, whatever notebook says"

 

If they have any sense, your daughter will have a new tv, if not, they wont be able to pass it off as a 1 off incident as all the victims will begin contacting the press, ask the press to ask for them to do so.....

 

I imagine the reason forces have began introducing GPS tracking is less for safety of officers and more about catching them up to no good, they can't pull the "no guv, we didnt attend X address and beat up Mr Jones" and when car GPS is checked, it "malfunctioned" at the appropriate time. And of course, skiving off etc.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much for reply, I will do that, you don't happen to have email for them,

 

Im just trying to get her account details and picture sorted out, tbh the one email that will be at the top of the list

is watchdog, she suffers from anxiety and can't go out much also, and this pressure is just too much.

 

Do you really think Head Office care? it's likely in their training! too widespread to be anything but.

 

Best bet is to go to the Press, or send an email to Head Office, stating whats occured, listing the email contact details of the many newspapers your going to be sending the story too, complete with photo's of terrified single mum and adorable, but terrified child, unless they have a solution in the next 3 days.

 

Like forgetting the debt, and sending a 42" tv as compensation for distress, as the distress to their reputation and business likely to be caused is going to be far more expensive, especially when people began saying hang on, this happened to me and begin reporting it to Police, and people who have HAD the police believe the rubbish and force entry contact professional standards, and report their force, and the police in turn, who will have the incidents in their notebooks, unless they knew they were behaving illegally, easily proven, as a page may be missing from their notebook at the time, but their equipment and vehicles has GPS Tracking showing where they were..... so the Police start arresting the companies staff for misleading police officers, misrepresenting themselves as Bailiffs (I bet thats what coppers will claim they did, whatever notebook says"

 

If they have any sense, your daughter will have a new tv, if not, they wont be able to pass it off as a 1 off incident as all the victims will begin contacting the press, ask the press to ask for them to do so.....

 

I imagine the reason forces have began introducing GPS tracking is less for safety of officers and more about catching them up to no good, they can't pull the "no guv, we didnt attend X address and beat up Mr Jones" and when car GPS is checked, it "malfunctioned" at the appropriate time. And of course, skiving off etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did your daughter make any attempt to enter into a repayment schedule for the arrears ?

 

What period of time is the agreement over ?

 

Are there any mandatory insurances on the agreement ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks like main Email for them is [email protected]

might be worth trying [email protected] complaints@@bayv.co.uk

There are 2 email addresses for their 2 "press officers" available, but they are outsourced from a PR company called GKStrategy, not internal

 

But if you wanted to, you or any reader have a choice of Ned

[email protected]

or John

[email protected]

 

This is the board, including their CEO:

http://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/people.asp?privcapId=11072122

its always possible that [email protected] might work, that being the CEO. I can't tell if its valid, as their server blocks email verification, but you can cc it in, if it is wrong you will just get an email back saying "invalid or wrong address"

 

I would also point out that the Last "Repo Man" to be exposed to the Press, is no longer a Repo Man, and his firm is gone.

 

 

Though it was mainly due to him being such an idiot,

he allowed a C4 team to follow him around breaking the law, or "being firm but fair" as he called the various assaults, threats of assaults and thefts seen on screen.

 

 

It especially, I imagine alarmed the companies he was working for, even the less reputable ones, to discover he is a convicted criminal with a violent reputation, who's wife was in prison on multiple joint offences, having taken the blame, presumably as repo work was a higher earner, whilst defrauding using car clamping not so much, who travelled around with violent convicted criminals under their name.

 

And the ultimate irony is when Bailiff's visited his "frail elderly" mother's home just like some of the frail elderly people he would attack and take cars from, he didn't see the funny side, even though unlike him, they had court warrants.

 

He had the stupidity to put it on youtube, given the threats of violence, from a man known to be a violent criminal, I cant remember if he actually uses violence on film, I would hapilly tell the EA's involved the link, so they can press charges.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

is this realy true..

did the BayV doorstepper actually try to force their way in

or simply indicated they wanted to take the goods?

 

and did they really say they could get the police

and they will lets them in?

 

not being funny, but, things can get somewhat exaggerated in these issues

and with Chinese whispers story passing.

 

no it is not correct they intimate the use of the Police

 

and indeed the CEO is on record stating they will deal with any employee that says that

and you've read my passed posts on this

I don't like them either.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

is this realy true..

did the BayV doorstepper actually try to force their way in

or simply indicated they wanted to take the goods?

 

and did they really say they could get the police

and they will lets them in?

 

not being funny, but, things can get somewhat exaggerated in these issues

and with Chinese whispers story passing.

 

no it is not correct they intimate the use of the Police

 

and indeed the CEO is on record stating they will deal with any employee that says that

and you've read my passed posts on this

I don't like them either.

 

It's a bit of a random thing to have come up with though. I can see "attempted to force their way in" but "we will get the police and they will arrest you" is a bit less random, and not easy to mistake, whilst one persons attempt to force way in, is another persons tried to stop door being closed. Police coming to arrest you and let us in is highly specific, esp coming from a company known to do this, and thus her mother discovering this page when googling if its true.....

 

I am sure the CEO is on record. They always cover themselves, but thats a very different thing to what staff might be trained to say behind closed doors. Hence why undercover journalists get so much dirt, the CEO has always covered his base, its often the training shown to be where the rot begins, with or without CEO's knowledge, though he isn't very good if he doesnt sneak people in to do quality control.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi good4me, I am Ceri, the Customer Service Manager at Buy As You ViewPlease be assured that we take the level of service we offer our customers very seriously, and we will always do our best to help any customer that has missed a payment to get back on track. I would be keen to have more information from your daughter and would encourage her to get in contact with us, so we can fully investigate this matter for her and come to resolution. Our Customer Service Team are available on 0333 777 3208 Monday-Friday 8am-8pm and Saturday 8-4pm, or she/you could email us if she prefers - if so please could you mark this for my attention. Kind Regards,CeriCustomer Service Manager, Buy As You View

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just got an email about message above,

 

I was ready to message them,

 

My daughter doesn't recall ever been given an account number,

 

She did say the the last thing they said to her was, don't bother going anywhere, we will be back with police,

 

They haven't been back yet, with or without the police, she is so timid she doesn't want me making a huge fuss for her,

 

she said the had another person out a week or so before, to arrange something about missed payment, but at the time

she was not well and ready to pass out so nothing was arranged.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is another thing she did say to me,

 

When she got the TV it was a refurbished, it was new

 

She is getting charged insurance money because she couldn't prove she had house insurance, the fee for that per week

Bed and TV and tumble dryer of a

 

She is £21 per week for her products

 

but weekly payment is £35 including insurance,

 

so thats around £14 per week for insurance,

 

at a guess Id think you could get for £15 per month,

Link to post
Share on other sites

get reclaiming!

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just got an email about message above,

 

I was ready to message them,

.

 

 

please ignore the unwelcomed visitor

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

take the threats part up with an email to the ceo as already advised by FK

 

 

as for the insurance..

you have all the statements from day one?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sent them an sar

get all the statements from day one when she first used them

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...