Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The 'test, test, test' call from WHO specifically applies to just ''suspected cases'' and those who recently had contact with confirmed cases. WHO isn't calling for speculative testing.   I assume Prof Tobyjug is referring to a PCR test but as testing the entire nation for anything is a fantasy it doesn't matter much.
    • The Three-Body Problem https://www.amazon.co.uk/Three-Body-Problem-Cixin-Liu-ebook/dp/B00S8FCJCQ/ref=sr_1_1?crid=3C1EMC34CA27V&dchild=1&keywords=3+body+problem&qid=1586240421&sprefix=3+bo%2Caps%2C229&sr=8-1      
    • I don’t see some users posts, but since they’ve been quoted .........   I agree (in parts) with 2 contributors postings.   WHO says “test, test, test”, so more tests ARE key. That is part agreeing with one contributor.   I also agree with cjcregg. One has to understand the limitations of a test : (sensitivity, specificity and its positive and negative predictive values - which involves sensitivity / specificity AND prevalence!).   One also has to understand which test, to apply those limitations. a) RNA NAAT? (Commonly called PCR, though PCR is a tradename, so ‘PCR’ is to ‘NAAT’ like ‘Hoover’ is to ‘vacuum cleaner’) b) Antigen testing? c) Antibody testing? (If so, IgM? IgG? Both??)   Knowing which test(s), their limitations, and thus what the result actually MEANS is more important than a blanket statement of “test everyone!”, (and repeatedly ??! ) .... especially as it allows prioritisation of who gets what test to maximise benefit, until “testing for all” is more than a pipe-dream .....   Would you repeat a positive IgG test? If so, in what circumstances??
    • Just out of interest, how long did it take you to formulate this conclusion? I'm not looking for a particularly accurate answer, just round it up to the nearest nano second.    How is this going to work then?   Where are the medical personnel and laboratory staff required to undertake this massive project going to come from? Now this is just a stab in the dark but I'd imagine they'd be quite busy at the moment.   Even South Korea, who are recognised as having one of the most aggressive testing policies have only managed to test 1% of their population. You clearly have no conception as to the scale of what you're proposing.   Even if it was possible to plan, organise and execute it would take years to achieve, by which time all the data would have been redundant and completely meaningless. I was tested last week and it took 2 days for the result, which by the time I received it was already out of date as I was then and now just as likely to be infected as I was when I took the test.   Think about it.    
    • I'm sure that the entire nation is reassured and lost in gratitude to you for this heart-warming confirmation.   Do keep us updated.
  • Our picks

nwb69

Employment Tribunal Computer Use

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1516 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Can somebody advise on the rules regarding use of a computer for reference purposes during a Tribunal Hearing

Thanx in advance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

In case it's relevant, have submitted paper bundles?

 

HB


Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use my iPad regularly. Never tried a computer though. Too cumbersome.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for replies so far

Have loads of paperwork + bundle ect.Just thinking that if I have to refer to Equality Act which is 200 pages would I be able to refer to computer for reference if its downloaded to a file.Computer is a lap top that can convert to ipad if required.Don,t want to turn up with it if its not permissable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You might find the iPad easier :) I honestly don't know the position with laptops but the charger would have to be PAT tested so if it isn't then the iPad seems the safer option!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CPS briefs are provided with a laptop stands in English Magistrates courts.

Don't know about ITUs but you can use tablets in county courts and SSCSA tribunals.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lappy's used for a while now so cant see a problem

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...