Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Better version attached with the late appeal explained more clearly for the judge. This will sound silly, but I think it would be a good idea to e-mail it to the court and UKPC on Sunday.  It's probably me being daft, but Sunday is still March, and as it's late, sending it in March rather than April will make it sound like it was less late than it really is.  if you get my drift. You can still pop in a paper version on Tuesday if you want. E-mail address for the court: [email protected] And for UKPC: [email protected]   [email protected] Defendant WS.pdf
    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arrow/restons claimform - Sainbury Loan 2005


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2955 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Name of the Claimant - Arrow Global

 

Date of issue – 04/02/16

 

What is the claim for –

 

The Claimant claims payment of the overdue balance due to the Defendants under a contract between the Defendants and Sainsburys Bank PLC dated on or about Jul 2005 and assigned to the claimant Jul 2011. Particulars a/c no XXXXXXXXXXX

DATE Oct 2015 Default Balance £XXXX

 

What is the value of the claim? £3000

 

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? Loan

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? 2005 according to the claim

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor

or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Assigned

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Possibly, I am trying to hunt down old paperwork

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?

I have marked on an old note default notice Sept 2009 but I need to find the original paperwork to confirm who sent it.

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ?

No idea, I don't think so

Why did you cease payments?

New baby and hours cut at work made finances very tight

What was the date of your last payment?

According to the notes I've found June 2009

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?

I believe I disputed all the charges they were adding but it's hard to remember now

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt managementicon plan?

Yes. They weren't particularly supportive at the time I think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They send out loads of claim forms

And panic people to pay in full

Or accept the debt and get a ccj

 

They don't expect people to challenge them

Sounds like statue barred check dates to make sure

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

This dates back ten years, I can't remember I'm afraid. I would think probably five years.

ok. no worries, just asking, as sometimes its been seen that they try to argue it from a termination notice if called in prior to its end 9of term. time will tell what they think.

otherwise, yes, if from the def notice, it shld be barred.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok. no worries, just asking, as sometimes its been seen that they try to argue it from a termination notice if called in prior to its end 9of term. time will tell what they think.

otherwise, yes, if from the def notice, it shld be barred.

 

Sorry, I've just re read my post and realise it came over in a rude way which wasn't my intention at all. I was just confessing to an atrocious memory.

 

So if it is SB, do I contact the company or write something on the court form?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You acknowledge the form online to MCOl, then you submit the statute barred defence. But you need to do your homework and be sure its sb first

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I'm trying to do the MCOL but I don't know which response I need. Help!

 

As far as I can see the default notice was served 2/9/2009 and the last payment was 05/1/2010 so there is no indication of any correspondence since then. So what is my next step?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm trying to do the MCOL but I don't know which response I need. Help!

 

What are you doing acknowledging service of the claim ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

What are you doing acknowledging service of the claim ?

 

Yes. I assume I need the defence option as it definitely looks like this is SB.

 

Or do I just acknowledge to get the 28 day option and then write to Restons stating its SB?

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you not acknowledged yet. check your timeline deadline. claim issued 4/2/16?

for now just acknowledge service with intent to defend all. you then get another 14 days to submit a defence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I can see the default notice was served 2/9/2009 and the last payment was 05/1/2010 so there is no indication of any correspondence since then. ..

maybe close re bar then. what type of payment was that, contractual or just a token payment?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No the last contractual was way before then.

 

I thought the last token payment was June 2009

but I've found an old loan statement which says payment received 05/01/2010.

 

It would only have been about 1/4 of a contractual payment but interestingly it is for the exact same amount as they charged me for a letter a couple of months earlier.

 

I'm wondering it is was a fee refund but it doesn't confirm either way.

 

So that would make it SB on the 5/1/2016 wouldn't it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No the last contractual was way before then. I thought the last token payment was June 2009 but I've found an old loan statement which says payment received 05/01/2010. It would only have been about 1/4 of a contractual payment but interestingly it is for the exact same amount as they charged me for a letter a couple of months earlier. I'm wondering it is was a fee refund but it doesn't confirm either way. So that would make it SB on the 5/1/2016 wouldn't it?

if it was just a token payment, then the usual 'one/two month later' re a missed contractual payment may not be applicable ie was just a 'reset' from the date of the payment.

if it was a refund, then its not your payment, and doesnt count as yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Prior to that amount I last made a contractual payment at the beginning of July 09.

 

 

I was then defaulted around September that year

 

 

just noticed they added fees from between £10 and £50 (Collections fee?) over that period too.

 

Would should my next step be?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd file the SB defence now

 

 

its for them to prove its not SB'd

not you to prove it IS.

 

 

The following defence is all you need if it is SB

1 The Claimant's claim was issued on (insert date).

2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980.

.

If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant.

.

3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £[insert figure from their POC] or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.

.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and if its not sb they likely wont have the paperwork anyway

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

and if its not sb they likely wont have the paperwork anyway

 

But what if they have ?

 

Better to be certain before using a statute barred defence as it cant be corrected afterwards.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

But what if they have ?

 

Better to be certain before using a statute barred defence as it cant be corrected afterwards.

 

Andy

How can I be any surer though? I have no paperwork after that showing any further payments were ever made. I don't remember giving them any else since or having any dialogue with them since.

Link to post
Share on other sites

phone the original creditor?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...