Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

JSA benefit fraud, initial letter confirming information, could lead to possible prosecution


jabbaHutt
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2883 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

It's to do with how much you have been overpaid and not the amount in the bank. Have they asked you to attend a taped interview or cautioned you at all? If they are merely asking for the info then it's compliance. That would explain why they are not writing to your solicitor.

 

I think you are jumping the gun with all this worry.

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

they are investigating the fact that i had over £16,000 in my savings when i claimed. that is why i think it will go to prosecution. i havent yet had any interview or caution. just a letter asking for information about my account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't put the name on. Sounds like a compliance letter to me.

It would be signed by an investigator and have the job title investigator underneath. Does the letter just ask for info and no appointment is given?

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello,

 

this is what it says after her name in an email she sent recently, FES Local Service Compliance Officer.

there is no appointment or interview at this time. just inquiring about my account, though speaking to her on the phone she mentioned that it could go to fraud depending on what information i was willing to give her. thats when she started making comments about me getting into trouble if i dont tell her what ever she wanted to know.

 

many thanks shoelover

Link to post
Share on other sites

It could go to fraud if they need to get authorised officers to approach your bank using the Fraud act.

How much benefit have you had in total? That will indicate the maximum possible overpayment.

Did you tell the solicitor that it was signed by a compliance officer?

Seriously, they almost certainly will slap a civil penalty on you (£50 fine) but it's sounding less and less likely that they are going to do anything other than put it right.

My advice is go to welfare rights and get them to help you put a letter together and send the info on. The longer you hold out the more likely they will wonder what you have to hide.

And lastly (and for once I am going to shout!!) STOP TORTURING yourself. It's nothing like as bad as it first seemed. However it's not going to go away on its own. Contact welfare rights or CAB on Tuesday.

 

 

Better? Xx

 

 

 

Ps will you let us know how you get on?

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It may pay you to check out your credit file to see if any accounts (bank/savings) are listed, if so then you can start to find out what is being looked into. If you have a bank account this is normally listed in your credit file, savings accounts are not normally shown.

 

 

It would also pay you to look at the search history to see if and other unknown entries are listed. You may be a victim of ID theft. This is worth checking out...

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The DWP also wanted to see my bank statements which I posted on 20 April and my letter said local service compliance. I'm still worried myself as I've still not heard anything back yet.

 

Also how long do is it normally take for the DWP to get back to me?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

The DWP also wanted to see my bank statements which I posted on 20 April and my letter said local service compliance. I'm still worried myself as I've still not heard anything back yet.

 

Also how long do is it normally take for the DWP to get back to me?

 

Thanks

 

There's no way we can say for sure how long it will take the Compliance officers to deal with the statements you've sent, but a few weeks would not be unusual. I wouldn't be worried at this point.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Why worry, the DWP latch onto those who are in need, believe it or not I voted tory at last 2 elections - never again. They have shafted me big time. Duncan Smith has the Scottish Police Force investigating him over PIP Payment disaster with suicides. Tell DWP to sling their hook. They employ snotty nosed little brats to do their dirty work, I know, because my sister in law works for them - enough said!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why worry, the DWP latch onto those who are in need, believe it or not I voted tory at last 2 elections - never again. They have shafted me big time. Duncan Smith has the Scottish Police Force investigating him over PIP Payment disaster with suicides. Tell DWP to sling their hook. They employ snotty nosed little brats to do their dirty work, I know, because my sister in law works for them - enough said!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Telling the Compliance officers to "sling their hook" is a pretty decent way to get benefit payments stopped unnecesssarily.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why worry, the DWP latch onto those who are in need, believe it or not I voted tory at last 2 elections - never again. They have shafted me big time. Duncan Smith has the Scottish Police Force investigating him over PIP Payment disaster with suicides. Tell DWP to sling their hook. They employ snotty nosed little brats to do their dirty work, I know, because my sister in law works for them - enough said!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

How have they "shafted" you?

 

But I'm sure the o/p is grateful for your advice..

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i contacted the woman from the dwp a few times about getting the new letter with the new information that she requires. she sent me a reply saying that she is changing teams and that it would be a while until she can sort things out, also, she sent a letter already. i have not yet recieved this and i told her that, she said that she would resend it.

could she say that i am stalling because i have not received the letter?

this is some thing that is worrying me now, i know that she could get the information without my help. i dont want to seem like i am not willing to sort this out. my thoughts are that i would end up in prosecution and she would say that i refused to help and refused to respond to letters that she sent.

 

what can i do to safeguard myself against this sort of thing?

 

thanks shoelover

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact that you have asked for the letter to be sent again says you are trying to sort it.

You could ring them tomorrow & say what you have said above. Take the name of the person you spoke to and keep a note. If you are really worried you could ask if you could pick the letter up from the office to cut out postal delays.

Have you told them how worried you are?

 

Perhaps if you were to tell me what you are afraid of I might be able to put your mind at rest. You are doing all that can be reasonably expected of you

  • Haha 1

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello,

 

i havent heard back from the woman at the dwp.

 

 

i spoke to a social worker at an autism group that i go to.

she told me to write a letter, that way they have to respond.

 

 

i am going to draft a letter and ask for her opinion on it and hopefully that will do something.

she told me that if i write a letter they wont prosecute me as i have admitted to what i have done.

i am not sure if this is correct.

i read that if they can prosecute they will.

 

it is causing me to worry a lot about it.

i am worried what affect it could have on me, prison or conviction.

 

 

i would have to tell an employer about a conviction, leading to me not getting a job.

 

 

this could possibly affect my credit which could affect my chances of getting a loan or mortgage in the future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you wont goto prison

you most prob wont get a conviction not for £840!!

you wont have to tell your employer anything

it cant affect your credit file .

 

 

stop worrying over stupid things you have read.

that apply to people that have defrauded £10'000 of pounds

they do not apply in your 'case'

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no indication from anything that you've said that they're considering prosecution.

Give them the information they're asking for.

 

 

If there's been an overpayment they'll want you to make arrangements to pay it back

and, as mentioned earlier, there is a possibility that they might add a £50 Civil Penalty (CP) to the amount owed.

 

 

A CP is not a criminal penalty, does not give you a criminal record,

and does not need to be declared as a conviction when you're looking for work.

 

If they were seriously considering prosecution (which would be very unlikely for such a small amount)

then you would not be dealing with Compliance.

You would instead be interviewed under caution by Fraud Officers.

Edited by antone
"...does *not* need to be declared as a conviction..."

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Antone. It sounds as if this is being dealt with by compliance & that means you are likely to get a civil penalty of £50 and that's it. Is the officer aware that you have autism?

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

I did tell the woman from the DWP that I have Aspergers and that talking on the phone,

with the things she is saying to me, is making me very anxious.

 

I still haven't received the letter she told me she has sent and resent. That was a month ago.

I think that her intentions are to accuse me of not getting the letter so she can go another route to get the information.

I have drafted a letter that I want to send her, recorded mail, this way she should get it and know that I am willing to help.

 

This is the letter:

 

In response to the email you sent me on 29th April, I have not received any letter yet.

Please could you send me the letter requesting the information that you require for your investigation.

 

 

you mentioned on the phone that you required new information that wasn't included in the original letter.

Please could you explain what that new information is.

 

Also, I have some anxiety issues and phone conversations are not a good idea

so any communication would be best dealt with either through email or letters, the former being preferred.

 

 

I would like to make it clear that my intentions are to be fully co-operative and provide any information required.

 

 

After looking through my records I may have made a mistake when claiming benefits,

please could you let me know how much over-payment has been made and how i can pay it back.

 

 

This is the draft, any advice on what I could add or take out would be great.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

With the best will in the world, letters get lost. As a compliance officer she does not have any other route to getting your bank statements.

 

 

Your letter is great- seriously there's nothing I can add. You are doing your best to put this right.

 

Do you feel less worried now?

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...