Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.


      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PCN for parking in residents bay on bank holiday

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3076 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then


Please click the "Report " link


at the bottom of one of the posts.


If you want to post a new story then


Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 



Recommended Posts

Dear All,


This is my first ever post on the forum and hopefully someone can help me.


In August I parked in a residents' bay on a bank holiday. The sign said Mon-Sat 0800-1600. I thought Sunday restrictions would apply on a bank holiday so I could park there. The pay and display bays on the same street are Mon-Sat 0800-1600 and do not charge on a Bank Holiday. I am now appealing to the adjudicator. Any tips on how to make my case?


I am also trying to find a electronic copy of the relevant TRO.

It's called Birmingham City Council (Jewellery Quarter Birmingham)(Controlled Parking Zone) order 2011.

I can't find it anywhere!


Also is there ever in joy in arguing that the council did not fully consider my original representations so they committed a procedural impropriety?


Thanks a lot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So far as the adjudicator is concerned, you don't at present have a case. The sign said one thing, you assumed wrongly, another. It's not your fault, but you just didn't assume the right way.


There is sometimes joy in arguing the council did not fully consider original representations. Can you give some more details?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The extra detail is that I am actually a resident but had not yet received my permit as I had only recently moved in. In my representations to them I argued that they should let me off because of this.


In their reply they did not make reference to this part of my representations.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They would be unlikely to cancel the PCN on those grounds, but they should have responded to it. It's more of a technical challange than anything else, but if you want to take it all the way and have a hearing, you can. You might get lucky.


Have you tried asking the council for the TRO? They should be able to provide you with a copy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK I now have the TRO. The wording relating to the Residents bays is as follows


Where a part of a Road shown on the On-Street plans is identified as a Permit Parking Place, then subject to the provisions of this Order, no person shall except upon the directions of a police constable in uniform or a Traffic Warden or with the permission of an Authorised Person, cause or permit any vehicle to wait in the Permit Parking Place unless:


a) it is a passenger vehicle, a goods vehicle not exceeding 5 tonnes maximum gross wight or a solo motor cycle; and


b) the vehicle is displaying a valid permit in the relevant position and that permit is so displayed for the whole time that the vehicle remains in the permit parking place

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...