Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell / 1st Credit


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2913 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

So, I had a rough time a few years ago, ran up some debt, got some defaults and now I've got myself sorted I'm trying to fix it all up.

 

Debt details:

 

A wonga loan (around 1k)

An unauthorised overdraft (500)

A credit card (1k)

A telecoms (250)

There may be another, smaller payday loan but I think I paid it off

These are all from three years ago.

There may be more oustanding debts from student days, but this would be 10+ years ago and I haven't heard a peep about them.

 

Now, Wonga wrote to me last year to say I couldn't afford the loan and so they bought it back and wrote it off. I've kept the email. I can see on my credit files (all three) that they've honoured this pledge as all wonga loans (under quickbridge) are marked settled balance zero, no record of default.

 

The telecoms amount I was chased by Lowell and settled at 85% discount. That's now also marked as settled, balance zero, default will drop off in three years.

 

I'm paying off the credit card to Lowell at 40 a month to 70% of the total. The default will also drop off in three years.

 

Here's the thing: I'm happy as long as hear defaults will clear so I can get a mortgage in three years or so. That's my prime motivation.

 

Now, yesterday I receive a letter from 1st credit looking to contact me. It's to my full name at my correct address which is only very recent.

 

After reading some of the horror stories about 1st credit on here, I'm now a bit worried.

 

I've emailed them to ask what it's about, given them no further details (they asked for my DOB and phone number) and indicated I don't think I'm the person they're looking for.

 

Here are my theories:

 

-Lowell have, for some reason, passed the credit card in repayment to them (but why when I'm being a cash cow?)

-they're contacting me about the overdraft debt or one of the much older debts? (But why not say what or who?)

- Because I've been checking credit files/corresponding with a DCA, heyre 'fishing' for a debt to chase me for???

 

What do you think, and what do you think (if anything) I should do?

 

Pledge to give full updates as matters progress...

 

Ciao

 

Oh - also worried, thanks to some of the horror stories - that they may be aware this house was recently bought and they're hoping to get it or something.

 

Now the house isn't mine and I have no beneficial interest in it at all, but after the stories I imagine nothing would put these people off.

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

might be best you start a new thread on each debt

in the named bank forum of the original creditor

off the main forum tab top left

 

 

just remember the golden rule mind

 

 

a DCA is NOT A BAILIFF

and has

NO SUCH LEGAL POWERS

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. To be clear, the only thing I'm worried about is the letter from 1st credit, after reading about them, just posted the rest for full background disclosure.

 

 

To be honest, I think I'll just ignore them completely from Joe until-

1) they tell me they're acting on a debt I recognise;

2) it's not one from ten years ago, and;

3) I've SAR 'd whichever OC it is to discover that it's actually been passed to 11st credit

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't waste the money TBH..

 

 

until/unless you get a better clue that is

then post back.

 

 

most people fall foul of dca's because they needlessly enter into lettertennis and get spoofed

ans scared by them

or they get a claimform and don't defend the claim properly with our help.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again :)

 

Out of interest, do you think they could be 'fishing' for a debt to chase?

 

 

Could they have access to my credit file, having had no dealings with me?

 

 

Are they known to have 'fished' before?

 

 

If they are acting for someone, shouldn't they just say who?

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

they will own one of the debts.

 

 

should be stated as such on your credit file.

 

 

the issue you have

 

 

is you've F&F 'd a debt with a DCA

and most prob one that you didn't need too.

 

 

that shows you're a bit green with

how DCA work and that effectively they have no legal powers whatsoever

 

 

but

you've cough'd, we call it being cash cowed/spoofed.

paying a debt off doesn't improve you credit file at all

 

 

the default is there for 6yrs regardless then the whole debt entry vanishes from your file

 

 

doesn't mean the debt itself might not be owed

mind

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know you call it 'cash cowed' in fact I used the term myself in my OP. I'm comfortable with that arrangement, as long as it stays that way until satisfied.

 

Neither do I mind being a bit green.

 

what troubles me is why 1st credit haven't said who they're acting for/what debt it is. It suggests to me they're fishing for something they don't know. Don't worry - not going to give them a single inch of further info.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:rockon::rockon::rockon:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know you call it 'cash cowed' in fact I used the term myself in my OP. I'm comfortable with that arrangement, as long as it stays that way until satisfied.

 

Neither do I mind being a bit green.

 

what troubles me is why 1st credit haven't said who they're acting for/what debt it is. It suggests to me they're fishing for something they don't know. Don't worry - not going to give them a single inch of further info.

 

This is normal for DCAs trying to establish first contact. Dont bite, and lets see...

 

FWIW, 1st credit normally do Loans OD and CC but never seen them with Telecoms accounts. They work just around the corner from me and I conductively can tell you, butting their heads together will not make them any smarter :p

So dont bite for now.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I predicted:

"Dear NAME

 

 

Thank you for contacting 1st Credit.

 

To enable us to discuss this matter via email we would appreciate it if you would confirm the following details for us within the next 7 days:

* Date of Birth:*

Previous postal Address:

 

Once this information has been confirmed we will then be able to discuss this matter with you.

 

This will give us authorisation to write to you via email while ensuring we are complying with data protection legislation.

 

Should no contact be forthcoming, your account may be subject to further letters, telephone calls, SMS and emails.

 

Yours sincerely,"

 

To which I replied,

no you can't have any personal details,

I don't know you,

I have no business with you and don't contact me again because I will not reply while I know of no business I have with you.

And I shan't reply unless I get anything new.

 

I double-checked my credit files - none of the debts have changed from the creditor they were to '1st credit' and there is no search there for 1st credit.

 

Ciao

Link to post
Share on other sites

they dont know who you are, they use the info from a CRA algorithm and send the same letter out to anyone who is close enough to the person they are after to give them a fair chance of being the person they want. It could be 10% or 90% fit, only they know how wide the net is cast

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're right - received this this morning:

 

"We have removed your email address from our current contact details and apologise for any inconvenience caused, this is by no means our intention."

 

It's angering - clearly they were just fishing for a debt to chase on the off-chance I had another, given I've been paying one to another DCA.

 

I think it's appalling they do this, asking for personal details etc.

 

Is there anyone this activity is reportable to?

 

Ciao

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes - it does bother me that I'm funding their activities as, even though I morally owe the debt, I hate the way these charlatans think they can make the rules up as they see fit.

 

However - I thought doing a CCA request was seen as outdated these days? Ie agencies have been provoked to get very defensive/play the game by following that route and, people have been losing in court against them...?

 

Please correct me if wrong

Link to post
Share on other sites

a CCA request is your Statutory right, its a legitimate request for information

 

 

https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/CONC/13.pdf

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Update: one of the debts with Low, havung been satisfied at about 10%, had been taken off ALL of my credit Giles, default and all. At first i thought this was just while they updated, but Month after month it remains absent from all three CRA.

 

I might see if i can negotiate similar goodwill on the other one (which is in a long term payment plan)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...