Employment Tribunal Hearing grounds of discrimination ( pregnancy )

[andydub64]

My "obsession" is with your daughter succeeding, and the risk you might mean she didn't recover anything or got less than she was due.

If she has secured recovering her judgement sum : all is well.

 

I'm glad she has got her compensation, and your obsession with Mr Smith and the judge hasn't interfered with that to the extent she got nothing.

Wasn't it £17k+ though?

Where did the extra 4K go?

 

The 13k came from the company / Mrs Smith?

This is what we've been telling you to focus on!

"Judgment coinciding with assets, enforce, sorted"

: glad my advice sunk in eventually.

 

At least now we don't have to try to get you to see sense re: judicial review, equality of arms, and any other legal buzzwords you have tripped over on the internet

 

Your advice and as for it sinking in, had no bearing on the conclusion on of the case, however, if you want to pat yourself on the back and pretend your contribution were of any use, i wont stop you, if that makes you feel important.

 

As for being tripped over the internet, lol, ive giving clear constructive answers and reasons why those "buzzwords" and why a JR, If i could be bothered, could be implemented and proved, the Judge failed to a standard that was owed to my daughter, and because of his failings (negligent actions) and but for me representing my daughter, she would have lost her case and any compensation gained.

 

But of course, in Barrys world, them nice judges would never act in this way and will always act in the interest of justice, whilst being paid by the tax payer who the judge is accountable for, and hence why a JR is an option of establishing judges who fail to show an equality of arms as to benefit one party, and put the other party in a weaker position as was the case in this case.

[andydub64]

Bazza, I'll leave the clinical diagnoses to those qualified to make them.

 

It just saddened me to read that a difference in opinions led to the op becoming derisive and using playground tactics to illustrate his assumed 'win' over the evil that is freely given advice.

 

Opinion and fact, assumption and evidence, maybe's and did happen, work it out or ask someone who is qualified to make them, and to mock as to earn brownie points "clinical diagnoses" in your attempt to justify what you feel, which is irrelevant, says it all.

 

I have thanked those who have giving me clear constructive advice, as for those being objective, for the sake of being objective, they were of no use to me nor my daughter, quite the reverse.

[BazzaS]

hence why a JR is an option of establishing judges who fail to show an equality of arms as to benefit one party, and put the other party in a weaker position as was the case in this case.

 

You've had replies (other than by me, too) setting out why JR is inappropriate and just plain inapplicable here. There seems little point in repeating the rationale to someone so irrational in the face of fact and its explanation.

 

Your advice and as for it sinking in, had no bearing on the conclusion on of the case, however, if you want to pat yourself on the back and pretend your contribution were of any use, i wont stop you, if that makes you feel important.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?459367-Employment-Tribunal-Hearing/page2

4th Feb, post #27

 

A special mention to BazzaS who has helped me out at the most crucial stage of this litigation, thank you.

 

'nuff said.

[citizenB]

Bazza, I'll leave the clinical diagnoses to those qualified to make them.

 

It just saddened me to read that a difference in opinions led to the op becoming derisive and using playground tactics to illustrate his assumed 'win' over the evil that is freely given advice.

 

 

I agree, think about it and because of this, I am now closing the thread, the OP obviously has his own visions of what advice should be given and I am afraid that is not the way CAG works.

[citizenB]

I must also point out that this is not the first post the OP has had closed for his attitude - so I am advising that any future thread started on this subject by this OP will be automatically closed down.

[andydub64]

I have made application to have a summary judgment set aide and a date and order has been giving.

 

On the same application i also stated that i wanted the case thrown out.

There is no mention of the application to throw the other parties claim out on the judges Order it just referes to an application to set aside summary judgment.

 

Can i still request the claim being thrown out as this has not been indicated on the order????

[BankFodder]

It will be very extraordinary for the case to be struck out at this stage.

 

If the application to set-aside successful, then the court will give you 14 days or 28 days – depending partly on what you ask for to file a defence. It will help you if you have filed a draft defence with your application or at least given a bit of an explanation about what your defence might be and why you expect to be successful if your application is granted

[andydub64]

Good Evening,

 

 

Can a defence be relied upon under CPR if it is later established that there was no contract/agreement in place?

In short the defence would be based on a misrepresentation and the Court accepted the defence on the provision that there was nothing to suspect or the otherside withheld the evidence that would show this to the Court are they not basing their defence illegally because to rely on that defence the facts or more importantly the basis of the defence is on the provision that all was in order when in fact this was not the case?

[BazzaS]

In short the defence would be based on a misrepresentation and the Court accepted the defence on the provision that there was nothing to suspect or the otherside withheld the evidence that would show this to the Court are they not basing their defence illegally because to rely on that defence the facts or more importantly the basis of the defence is on the provision that all was in order when in fact this was not the case?

 

If that is "in short" ; please spare the long version, unless you can break it down into something intelligible.

 

Your question is :

a) so convolutedly phrased as to make an answer almost impossible even if it was in context, while

b) so devoid of context that even a clearer question might be hard to answer.

 

So, the closest I can get to an answer lies somewhere between:

Definitely! Or

Possibly!! ..... or

Certainly not!

 

Some basic background might help:

Are you the claimant? Defendant?

What was the PofC and the defence?

Which track is this in? (relevant to disclosure)

 

It is also worth noting a member of site team (back then!) commented on thread (as they closed it!)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?459367-Employment-Tribunal-Hearing&p=4881996#post4881996

 

I must also point out that this is not the first post the OP has had closed for his attitude

 

So, I can only hope you aren't trolling for replies pointing out how difficult it is to answer (& why), so that you can start an argument!

[BazzaS]

The URL gets "broken".

Options :

a) remove the line break (the "%20") after the 'c' of co.uk, and the space in the last '4881996', or

 

b) hit 'reply with quote' and copy and paste it from there, where it isn't "broken"

[AndyOrch]

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?459367-Employment-Tribunal-Hearing

[BazzaS]

Thanks Andy.

CB's post that I quoted is on p.15 (the last page) of that thread.

[BazzaS]

Threads (3?) have been merged.

Are these all the same case, though??