Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
    • ROFL - dont get upset just because someone (quite a lot of someones) dont want smart meters - well unless you get paid for it .. in which case ...   I assume you haven't been with Octopus long enough to be on one of the very long fixed price tariffs they offered before the prices went bonkers .. and that you dont use your electricity in the evening/lunch time if you think the 'agile type tariffs are good value .. let alone worth installing a smart meter for - high price a good disincentive for an evening cuppa eh? Let alone all your computer/tv etc time in the peak price evening or lunch time. - and boy do those peak prices instantly hammer your bill when those Russian and middle eastern issues kick off.   I would only have considered a smart meter if solar panels had been an option for me - but roof is oriented completely the wrong way. Oh - and My opinion hasn't changed since the smart meter trials 40 years ago, because neither have the issues (well not enough) but I'm happy for you. Be happy for me.
    • Hi. I'm afraid I've had to hide your post with the pdf files to keep this anonymous for you. You've left the PCN reference number and your car reg showing. Could you edit that and repost please? HB    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

QQ Irresponsible Lending query


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2887 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I wouldn't worry about sending anything to quickquid - just prepare all the evidence that supports your case for when/if you need to escalate to ombudsman. It was quick quid whose responsibility to do the checks, not for you to supply it to them!

 

 

As I am sure you have read, quickquid will make you sweat the full 8 weeks then come back with some derisory offer

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi All,

 

Sorry I feel like I have asked so many questions, this will be my last I promise!

 

So QQ came back saying they will use the information they have internally so great.

 

So I am currently waiting to hear back from QQ and 2 other lenders (PDUK, Wonga) however I have not sent any of them a copy of my credit report to back up my case.

 

I have a 32 page report generated from Noodle in February which lists all the loans with all 3 PDL companies, am I advised to send this to QQ as additional info now?

 

Again any advice would be greatly appreciated.

 

D

 

Hi,

 

I received generic email after generic email from Quickquid. I filled in absolutely no other questions they gave me and sent absolutely nothing else off to them. I just kept asking if their latest email was their final response. They finally replied saying that they have 8 weeks etc and will be in touch. That deadline passed yesterday so referred to FOS now, fingers crossed! Send them nothing else - though may be handy to keep hold of your credit report to sent to FOS to help your case if it goes that far!

 

As for your other complaints, I received a decent offer from Wonga after about 10-11 weeks of waiting for their final response, without going to FOS.

 

Payday UK is currently with the FOS.

 

Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Just been reading through your thread.

 

 

Have you tried to email the Uk CEO and the US CFO?

 

 

I got the same copy and pasted final response.

It didn't answer any of my concerns and even got the main issue right.

It mentioned my most recent loan and that was it.

 

 

Yesterday once I had calm down and had a good nights sleep I did a little digging.

I wrote an email to Mr Drew (UK QQ CEO)

Clare Hardy (named on the FCA register)

Daniel Feehan (USA Chairman of the board of QQ parent company Cash America)

Brent Stuart (Cash America CEO)

 

 

I wrote an email attaching my final response.

I also wrote to the media outlets who wrote articles about PayDay Loan especially the ones who wrote about QQ.

I copied in those above to them emails also.

 

 

An hour later I got a response from Clare Hardy,

she must be the lower level manager who answers to Mr Drew.

 

 

She's said that she will review my complaint herself but needed more time (I gave them by the close of business)

I have replied with a list of all my issues including this new one in regards to their complaint handling.

 

 

I've forwarded to her all my evidence and attachments.

Has this happened to anyone else and what was the outcome?

 

 

Hopefully Ill have some good news and pave the way for a second chance before the FOS.

Here's hoping!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Just update on the CEO of QQ route. It does no good they just reject the complaint too. I have forwarded it on now to the Ombudsman and I am just waiting for an adjudicator to be allocated. Clare Hardy did give me the evidence they will be sending to the FOS and it was laughable. They had that I owned by home when I clearly do not and never have done. They also said I have worked at the same company throughout my history with them that's bull. The evidence spreadsheet they sent was created in 2013 hmmm very suspious.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, sorry not been on

 

My case became quite interesting with going back and forward with the adjudicator. She eventually found in my favour from 2010 through to the end of the QQ loans in 2012 and asked Casheuronet to refund me the interest paid and 8%. This is where my loans went from £750 per week to £1350. It was from when I asked QQ for a refund so was happy with this.

 

She decided that the Pounds to Pocket loans were affordable as they were a much lower amount per month, and I earned a good wage (I did) so despite QQ and P2P being the same company, they did for a long time operate separately. I have to be honest I agreed with her, my salary was well over £2k per month, so a payment of £180 per month shouldn't have hurt me, but the QQ repayments of £1700 definitely did!

 

The findings went back to QQ and they decided to agree with her. The said they would repay the interest from June 2010, remove the loans from credit file, but use some of my refund to pay off my outstanding P2P loan, which is a bit cheeky as its up to date, never been in arrears and only had 4 months left on it. However, it saves me £226 per month going forward, so no issue there.

 

In total I received a £7k refund. It took around a week to go into my account, probably because I chased to find out when the P2P loan would be paid off

 

However in none of this was any mention of my flexi loan account, which I brought up with the adjudicator. She told me that QQ had not supplied any information for this account, which surprised me. She said as it was a flexible loan then repayments would be smaller and thought that as it was more like a P2P loan it would be unlikely to succeed. I then pointed out how much i'd borrowed, the fact it was at PDL rates and based on receiving the totals borrowed and repaid, I must have paid on average £395 per month in interest alone. This led me to believe that I must have had the max £1400 nearly every month.

 

She agreed to look at it again but I've not heard anything. I thought I was paying back around £600 per month then borrowing the other £200 back (a minimum payment so to speak) but I've gone back through my bank account today, and listed all the in going and outgoing for this account. Turns out most months I was repaying £1600 or more, so I'm hoping this will be upheld too, as its exactly the same as the PDL that were deemed unaffordable a year earlier. I've sent the adjudicator my findings. I'll update as soon as I have a response

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...