Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

A1 Approved Warranty


WGill
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3008 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

 

I bought a car in May which came with an A1 Approved warranty for 12 months, so well within the period of cover at the time of writing this.

 

I had an issue with the passenger side window at the weekend to which it would no longer operate, fortunately it was stuck closed rather than open. I called A1 Approved to discuss and to learn on how to proceed on this, after explaining the issue I was told to book it in with any VAT qualified garage and to advise the garage to call A1 Approved with a diagnosis and price.

 

The car has been in the garage today, they were really helpful and called A1 Approved to explain the issue which was a broken window regulator but A1 Approved advised this was not covered under the warranty. I was left with no option but to pay for the works.

 

I can't believe that a warranty wouldn't cover such an item and their own website does list window motor as a covered item (can't post the link).

 

Has anyone got any experience with this company or can anyone advise how I can escalate this matter?

 

Thank you.

Edited by WGill
Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all, it would be helpful if you could space in paragraph your post correctly is to make it easier for those people who are going to help you, to read.

 

In principle, you don't need the warranty anyway. York to read a little bit about extended warranties on this forum.

 

You should be adequately covered by the sale of goods act.

 

Can you tell us a bit more about the car. How old was it? How much did you pay for it?

 

You have had the car for about nine months. Even if it is second-hand it is required to be of satisfactory quality and remain satisfactory quality for a reasonable period of time.

 

What is satisfactory depends on a number of things including the price paid, any claims made about it and the item itself. What is satisfactory depends on what might be the view of a reasonable consumer in similar circumstances.

 

If you paid a couple of hundred pounds for an old banger then 10 months might well be good going as far as the electric windows are concerned. On the other hand if you paid several thousand pounds then I would have thought that the sale of goods act would cover you quite easily.

 

So we need some more details please.

 

Of course in addition to this, it is entirely possible that the insurer simply trying to get out of their commitment. This is often quite normal for insurers.

 

Although you can't post the link, you can actually quote the text from the terms and conditions so why do you do that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologies - having trouble writing on my desktop, had to insert paragraphs on my phone!

 

The car is an Audi A5 first registered in 2008. I paid £14,000 for this pleasure. There have been no previous claims.

 

There are no T&C's on their website, I simply pulled 'electric window motor' from their list of 'following components are protected against mechanical failure' on their website.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you.

 

Well it depends on how you want to deal with it. On the basis of what you say you could proceed on the basis of the warranty. Seeing as you paid for it, I think that you should do that anyway.

 

If you are dealing with people on the telephone then I suggest that you read our customer services guide and implement the advice there. Then call the insurer and start finding out why they are denying the loss. It's very important that you get everything recorded. If they don't think that they going to be quoted later on they say all sorts of silly things and implicate themselves.

 

After a couple of phone calls, I would suggest that you write to them and tell them that they are in breach of contract and also they are in breach of ICOBS and that you propose to make a complaint to the financial ombudsman service if they continue to deny the loss.

 

Tell them that as an alternative to the FOS, you may begin a legal action.

 

Who supplied you with the car? Give us the name and a link to their website.

 

Did they sell you the warranty as well?

 

Have a look at the sale of goods act – section 14 which deals with goods having to be of satisfactory quality. At £14,000 I have absolutely no doubt that you are entitled to have the entire thing in good working order for probably at least two or three years – minus wear and tear. Electric windows included.

 

Phone the dealer and start talking to them about it. Course you will be recording the call won't you?

 

They will try to fob you off onto the warranty. It's up to you now to stir it up between the insurer and the dealer. Tell the dealer that you've tried invoking the warranty and the insurer is refusing. Tell the dealer that as the car has been bought from them, you expect them to honour your statutory rights and to repair the window and to do it pretty fast as well.

 

Come back here and let us know what everybody says

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's great, thanks for your advice. I shall get on with these in the morning.

 

The car was purchased from Optimum Vehicles in Wetherby. The warranty came with the purchase of the car, the dealer didn't sell this to me as an add on. I guess this is something that they pay for from their contribution.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The cover on the various components depend on the level of warranty the OP has. The different levels are listed here :-

 

http://www.a1approved.co.uk/component_covers.php

 

However, a faulty window regulator is different from a faulty window regulator motor, the motor drives the regulator up and down and is usually a distinctly separate part. Depending on the cover provided, the motor would be covered, the regulator, not.

 

Forgive me for not taking part in the inevitable debate as to whether these 'warranties' are a good buy or not.

 

H

44 years at the pointy end of the motor trade. :eek:

GARUDALINUX.ORG

Garuda Linux comes with a variety of desktop environments like KDE, GNOME, Cinnamon, XFCE, LXQt-kwin, Wayfire, Qtile, i3wm and Sway to choose from.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

knowing these cars well can I suggest it wasn't your window motor that has failed, it was more than likely to be the window mech that failed which is operated by cables (it kind of looks like a bow and arrow)

 

A design fault in my opinion allows water inside the door and rust's the cable

 

I know these can be expensive £500+ for a new mech, I have used a rebuild service in the past for these (under £100)

 

warranty's genrelly are not worth the paper they are written on

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reclaim the utterly useless ext warranty

 

Haha we ripped you

 

The bit of your car that failed is down to wear n tear..tough luck .. We fleeced you

 

DX

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

knowing these cars well can I suggest it wasn't your window motor that has failed, it was more than likely to be the window mech that failed which is operated by cables (it kind of looks like a bow and arrow)

 

A design fault in my opinion allows water inside the door and rust's the cable

 

I know these can be expensive £500+ for a new mech, I have used a rebuild service in the past for these (under £100)

 

warranty's genrelly are not worth the paper they are written on

 

The total cost of the repair was roughly £200 so I'm not sure if it would be that part, it's on the invoice as window regulator.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As Hammy says, we need to know what level of cover you have ??

 

I have just called them and I have the top level (gold) cover but they said flat out that this does not cover the regulator. Do I have anywhere to go from here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see a gold cover only the following:

 

A1 Executive Cover

A1 Cover

A2 Cover

A3 Cover

A4 Cover

A5 Cover

 

If gold equates to the A1 Executive, then you are covered. You need to look at your documents or ask them again and get it in writing.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

A very quick, unscientific and possibly not even true, Google and ebay.co.uk search brings up this :-

 

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/AUDI-A5-ELECTRIC-Window-Regulator-NEW-O-S-DRIVERS-SIDE-FRONT-WITH-OUT-MOTOR-/321991858522?fits=Car+Make%3AAudi%7CModel%3AA5&hash=item4af835d95a:g:eysAAOSwqrtWmnGS

 

£100, about right.

 

Can't get a genuine price as i work for the wrong brand!

 

Interestingly, the website I found a was a guess as they are based in Leeds, near Wetherby. What is the warranty company's address in your book as the website mentioned above doesn't mention 'Gold' cover

 

H

44 years at the pointy end of the motor trade. :eek:

GARUDALINUX.ORG

Garuda Linux comes with a variety of desktop environments like KDE, GNOME, Cinnamon, XFCE, LXQt-kwin, Wayfire, Qtile, i3wm and Sway to choose from.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see a gold cover only the following:

 

A1 Executive Cover

A1 Cover

A2 Cover

A3 Cover

A4 Cover

A5 Cover

 

If gold equates to the A1, then you are covered. You need to look at your documents or ask them again and get it in writing.

 

Yes, the documents don't match what their website says. The warranty booklet I have only refers to gold and silver cover. I would assume A1 equates to gold though as they said it was the top level of cover.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will have to contact them, assumptions are no good, you need to know exactly what level of cover you have.

 

Have another look at the documents and see if we are talking the same A1 Warranties company ?

If there is a company number on the docs all the better.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

A very quick, unscientific and possibly not even true, Google and ebay search brings up this :-

 

 

£100, about right.

 

Can't get a genuine price as i work for the wrong brand!

 

Interestingly, the website I found a was a guess as they are based in Leeds, near Wetherby. What is the warranty company's address in your book as the website mentioned above doesn't mention 'Gold' cover

 

H

 

The addres is:

 

A1 Approved Limited

Office 53, Sugar Mill

Oakhurst Road

Leeds

LS11 7HL

 

Tel: 0800 9706860

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst I disagree with the sentiment and abuse in some of the posts, this :-

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?268763-A1-Approved-Warranty-Problem

 

might help.

 

H

44 years at the pointy end of the motor trade. :eek:

GARUDALINUX.ORG

Garuda Linux comes with a variety of desktop environments like KDE, GNOME, Cinnamon, XFCE, LXQt-kwin, Wayfire, Qtile, i3wm and Sway to choose from.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst I disagree with the sentiment and abuse in some of the posts, this :-

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?268763-A1-Approved-Warranty-Problem

 

might help.

 

H

 

That link, post #13, also says they have a Gold policy, something not quite right how it is being described differently to how the company describes it.

 

I also notice the claims manager responded personally. I wonder if he will be interested in this thread. If so, he will have to contact the site administration to get corporate permission.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, that is the same company so 'gold' doesn't come into it, you will have one of the policies listed above.

 

I have just spoke to William at A1 Approved and he assures me A1 equates to gold and vice versa.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just spoke to William at A1 Approved and he assures me A1 equates to gold and vice versa.

 

In that case it is not covered by the warranty:

 

The following components are protected against mechanical failure (as defined elsewhere in this document). Please note that if a part is not specifically listed it is therefore not covered.

 

Engine

Rocker assembly, inlet and exhaust valves, valve guides and springs (excluding burnt valves and decokes), cylinder head (excluding cracks and

overheating damage), head gasket, push rods, camshaft and cam followers, timing gears, chains and tensioner, oil pump, pistons and rings, cylinder

bores, gudgeon pins, con rods and bearings, crank shaft and bearings, oil seals and bushes, inlet and exhaust manifolds, fly wheel and ring gear,

distributor drive, oil cooler.

 

Gearbox

Manual

All internal failures of gears, shafts, synchromesh hubs, selectors, seals and bushes, bearings, speedometer drive, overdrive units (when fitted),

solenoid, transfer box.

Automatics

All internal failures of gears, oil pump, seals, shafts, bushes, clutches, brake bands, bearings, governors, servos, torque convertor, drive plate, valve

block, computer governor, modulator valve, speedometer drive.

 

Continuous Variable Transmissions

CTX/CVT

All internal failures of clutches, planetary gears, reductions gears, shafts, variable pulleys, thrust link drives, internal seals, bushes and bearings.

 

Drive System (front/rear)

Crown wheel and pinion, half shafts, half shaft oil seals, bearings, planet gears, bevel gears, rear external drive shafts, constant velocity joints, 4-wheel

drive units.

Excluding: Beam axle and bearings, radius arm and bearings, rubber gaiters, drive flange, together with all other parts not listed.

 

Brakes

Master cylinder, wheel cylinders, brake callipers, servo, brake pumps, brake limiter valve, ABS computer/sensors/pumps.

 

Steering

Rack and pinion, steering box, idler box, power steering rack/ram and pump, pressure pipes, reservoir, steering column.

 

Cooling System

Water pump, thermostat, heater matrix, electric fan motor/sensor, viscous fan coupling, radiator, air conditioning pump, condenser, evaporator,

magnetic clutch and valves (when fitted as standard).

 

Propshaft

Propshaft, universal joints and bearings.

 

Fuel System

Mechanical/electrical fuel pump, carburettor, electronic carburettor sensors and stepper motor, choke assembly, injection pump.

 

Front/Rear Suspension

Shock absorbers, coil springs, upper and lower wishbones, ball joints, swivel joints, McPherson struts, suspension arms, anti-roll bar, self-levelling units and reservoir, pump and regulator valves, seals, displacer, hydro-pneumatic system.

 

Wheel Bearings

Front and rear wheel bearings.

 

Clutch

Centre plate, pressure plate, thrust bearing, clutch fork, cable, master cylinder, slave cylinder.

 

Electrics

Starter/solenoid, alternator, regulator, coil, distributor, electronic ignition module, front and rear window/headlamp wiper motors, heater fan motor,

indicator interrupter unit, electric window motor, sun roof motor, instrumentation gauges where purchased separately, centralised locking solenoids/

pumps, switches, relays, sensors, electric aerial motor, horn, cruise control system. (Front and Rear heated screens and elements are excluded from cover).

 

Casings

Cylinder block, gearbox, and axle if they have been damaged by a mechanical breakdown of one of the above parts

 

There would appear to be nothing of the bodywork covered.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

And that's not unusual. Some of these products are called MBI's. Mechanical Breakdown Insurance. Most do not cover Bodywork, Body related or trim.

 

Please don't let us get into a massive discussion about what is trim........ or not.

 

H

44 years at the pointy end of the motor trade. :eek:

GARUDALINUX.ORG

Garuda Linux comes with a variety of desktop environments like KDE, GNOME, Cinnamon, XFCE, LXQt-kwin, Wayfire, Qtile, i3wm and Sway to choose from.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3008 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...