Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

The work programme


louise2012
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2278 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I did the work programme with working links. Most of the time I just went in every 2 weeks to do a one hour job search. Sometimes they just phoned me for a quick chat, so I didn't have to attend. If they think you have no chance of getting a job, then they will mostly ignore you for the whole 2 years. They have targets to meet, so they will focus on the most employable people.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

My lodger was put on the work programme

and despite my negative feelings towards them actually have paid off. within 1 month hes now in full time employment.

 

Does not excuse all the underhand stuff they pull on most people though

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The main issue with this is that people who are sick and on ESA WRAG are mandated to do this nonsense, for many it is totally pointless because there health conditions aren't likely to ever improve enough to allow them to work, this and i would suspect even attending the WP is a challenge for some

Link to post
Share on other sites

A question i have not sure if this is the right place but regarding universal job search i was told at the Job centre i had to choose 3 jobs to search in my commitment form is this true as whilst reading the forum its opened my eyes to how slimy these people can be.

Is this when claiming JSA (claimant commitment ) ? If so then it is whatever steps to finding work that you agreed at the initial interview ( day 1) UJ isn't it's self mandatory, but if you have agreed to use it, (claimant commitment) then if you are found not to be doing it they can raise a doubt for failing to carry out what you agreed to do,

On another note a work coach can Mandate a jsa claimant to create account & upload public CV, Subject to taking in to account their personal circumstances, such as internet access and access to a pc at home, as well as them accepting cookies , as well as any health conditions that would make attending the JCP frequently a problem

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes JSA claiment commitment. Reason i ask is i was really pushed into thinking of 3 jobs i could do when in truth i had major concerns about holding them down. Does baffle me how they think folk want to live off £70 odd quid a week. Thanks for your help hopefully i'm due a claiment commitment update soon either that or someone might believe i have little to no chance of getting/holding down a job.

Link to post
Share on other sites

according to official gov sources the work programme is due to end in/by 2017 well in it's current format at least to be replaced with the Work & health programme , is it yet another evil method of persecuting the sick & unemployed, if IDS has had any say it in it no doubt it will be

 

https://intensiveactivity.wordpress.com/2015/11/28/work-and-health-programme-will-it-treat-the-unemployed-as-ill/

I'm surprised that there hasn't been that much reported about this , so far as 2017 isn't light years away,

And more alarming if true is thishttps://kittysjones.wordpress.com/2015/10/28/the-government-plan-to-nudge-sick-and-disabled-people-into-work/

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I was due to see my advisor today on the work programme, however I had to do job search instead of seeing her. Also I've had no reminders for future appointments but have to go tomorrow which I was told verbally before I left this afternoon. Anyway, do I show the letter to her tomorrow about the appointment today or should I leave it.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

To begin with I actually gave them the benefit of the doubt despite knowing a guy who took a job as a zero hours cleaner, just to get away from them. He has dyslexia and they, possibly deliberately, sent him the wrong days/times for his appointments. Whenever he showed up they claimed it was the wrong day/time and he was sanctioned many times...

 

At first I was very enthusiastic & it did give me a kick up the booty. Had many interviews and new re-gained focus... until the lies started. Then the manipulation and mind games... and finally the hounding. Pretty much all the staff from the first time I attend are no longer at the centre, just a few stragglers left hanging on. Almost anything I was told by them I queried at the JCP, often to be told ' Erm no! who told you that?' when i replied it was a WP advisor they'd just roll their eyes and say 'Oh that lot?' Our JCP know they are useless, I've seen a lot of people still accessing the PCs for mandated Job Searches meaning they must have come back from being on WP and mandated to access the internet in the JC. It's a sad state of affairs. Probably some of them are dregs but I bet they weren't in the slightest on Ingeus radar... they only look at those able to make them the ££££.

 

During my time there though I found the majority of the people genuinely wanted to find employment & most were doing all the could to get themselves back into work. People also supported each other, quite a few times I was going to accept a role only for someone else on the programme to say "really going to take that job? it won't last/not contracted... don't do it" to this WP folks would be angry and snarling under their breath... At least the clients helped each other!

 

In short my time was wasted (so many late appointments with an advisor who was NEVER on time) & I have gained nothing except more anxious & unhappy. Could say it's been a contributory factor to my current status & well being. Ingeus don't care, not about clients, their lives and any genuine barriers they have to getting back into the working world. They just want money for "their part" in finding a job for you... even when it's totally useless, below your skill level, likely to leave you financially worse off & destitute... so long as they get a bonus and payout from DWP. System a shambles, Press the destruct button Please! :sad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

In short my time was wasted (so many late appointments with an advisor who was NEVER on time) & I have gained nothing except more anxious & unhappy. Could say it's been a contributory factor to my current status & well being. Ingeus don't care, not about clients, their lives and any genuine barriers they have to getting back into the working world. They just want money for "their part" in finding a job for you... even when it's totally useless, below your skill level, likely to leave you financially worse off & destitute... so long as they get a bonus and payout from DWP. System a shambles, Press the destruct button Please! :sad:

 

My first experience of A4e left me with the firm impression of a disorganised office staffed by headless chickens who didn't have a clue what they were doing. This impression was reaffirmed at subsequent meetings where they appeared to make the rules up as they went along. Also had the long wait for an "adviser" that couldn't keep to a schedule. Passed comment that "You expect me to be on time, there is an expectation that you also do the same".

 

As for the destruct button, I have repeatedly pressed it, but like most things connected to the Work Programme, it doesn't work.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Headless chickens? lol! They have so much paperwork to do, possibly explains why there are so many errors in the letters they send to clients... I once had a letter sent with the "You didn't make your last app, so we have arranged a new app time/day for you"... I was puzzled as I attend every app with them, phoned the 'advisor' and in fairness they did apologise that it was a mistake. Still this is what I mean by mind games.

 

I hear next year there'll be "health advisors" appointed to each WP... & they can contact your GP too... god help anyone still attending at that time. Taking health advice from Ingeus/A4E/WL? :jaw: I think not...

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a point, Nystagmite. I would have thought they would need a specific form to give them permission to approach someone's GP, the same as an insurance company or an employer. I think it would be covered by the Access to Medical Reports Act 1998.

 

How would the WP know who your GP is, btw?

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hear next year there'll be "health advisors" appointed to each WP... & they can contact your GP too... god help anyone still attending at that time. Taking health advice from Ingeus/A4E/WL? :jaw: I think not...

 

I recall seeing several adverts about two years ago from various WP providers attempting to recruit "Health Professionals" to deliver certain provisions under the Work Programme. Primarily, they were looking to recruit newly qualified individuals from a variety of disciplines, if for no other reason that it would be a lot cheaper than finding someone with real world experience.

 

They would still need express and explicit consent to contact your GP and gain access to your medical records.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a point, Nystagmite. I would have thought they would need a specific form to give them permission to approach someone's GP, the same as an insurance company or an employer. I think it would be covered by the Access to Medical Reports Act 1998.

 

How would the WP know who your GP is, btw?

 

HB

 

I'd guess they'll slip in a form requesting GP's details whenever a client enrolls onto the Programme. Back at my induction I could see quite a few people scouring the forms in detail, others however happily signed away all their rights to data protection... When anyone questioned anything on these forms, the reply was always "it's mandatory that you sign, we own you now!"... :-x Lying Puckers!

 

Hopefully these plans will never come to anything. Intruding on the confidential GP/Patient relationship is bad enough but this could give WP providers another reason to gain a sanction/raised doubt... i.e.: no doctors note for one days missed appointment? Doubt raised = Sanctioned! Then the client would have to go through the appeals process, taking up more time while they struggle financially, meaning WP could put more pressure on them to take one of their 'opportunities'.

 

It's all about who has the power. Many clients are still unaware of the rights and power that they have over WP providers. Thankfully sites like these have been spreading the word.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully these plans will never come to anything. Intruding on the confidential GP/Patient relationship is bad enough

 

There were a couple of pilot schemes being set up a while back, mainly aimed at ESA claimants. I haven't seen any reports as to whether these produced any quantifiable results. I suspect the extra costs of employing suitably qualified staff exceeded the financial returns and the pilot projects were quietly shelved.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember this being mentioned years ago and some people complaining. It was something, I do believe, about how non-medically trained people are supposedly giving medical advice. I've got a lot of complex medical problems and at times, the medical profession have said they don't know what to do with me (because I can't have a lot of medication / my situation is just too complex) so goodness knows what people from WP think they can do!

 

I also wouldn't allow someone like them access to my medical records either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a troll?

 

No think BB suggested jonnietemple might be.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

The link was working yesterday, but I'm getting a "502 Bad Gateway" error which usually indicates a problem on the server hosting the page.

Did find this link to what looks like the original letter: http://54yearsintheuk.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/open-letter-to-avanta-work-programme.html

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought they abolished the Work Programme ? How can this STILL be going on ? They are worse then useless, no idea how to help the unemployed with their outdated offices and lies...

 

I've been able to put off singing on for Universal Credit for at least another month but last time I had finished the two year sentence on the WP... PLEASE don't say they'll send me back there again! Is this nationwide? Do they still have it in Scotland ? Surely not!

Link to post
Share on other sites

PLEASE don't say they'll send me back there again! Is this nationwide? Do they still have it in Scotland ? Surely not!

 

Unless the rules have changed, I was under the impression that you couldn't be referred back to the Work Programme once you had completed a two year stint.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless the rules have changed, I was under the impression that you couldn't be referred back to the Work Programme once you had completed a two year stint.

 

 

Apologies Mr. P. can you send me a link to that please? I've been in the SG for 5 years, they're looking at kicking me off that shortly into the WRAG, are you saying this is no longer the case, it doesn't exist?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...