Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes apologies I thought it was a fixed loan as it involves a guarantee and being a business debt
    • Intrum passing account on to resolvecall and arranging home visit   Any advice 
    • On the second claim – for the front patio and in respect of which you haven't so far issue the claim, as far as we can make out – once again with the kind assistance of my site team colleague @FTMDave, we think that the correct claim should be     This would leave you with a patio which had cost you £7888 – and which is the price that you originally contracted for .   You agreed to pay £7888 for the front patio. If you claimed the £14,000 or so that you are proposing, you would be in a position where you would be getting a front patio almost free of charge   So we think that your claim should properly be for £6439.60 p However in the circumstances, I should certainly wait until we figure out what to do about the first claim that you put in. I've already suggested that you contact the sheriffs – and maybe you would come back here and let us know that you have done that and what they said.   incidentally, these are our figures – you need to do your own calculations and confirm them independently or come up with a different calculation – independently. Same for the first claim.
    • I got a letter saying the police have not received my form, license that I had to send off for 3 points, I have paid the £100 aswell, I sent the license off and form, on the 12th of November, and it got there on the 15th of November, it was signed by the court and it was photographed, for proof..   The letter states I have  an extra 7 days to send it in.. received the letter on the 24th of November...   what happens next? I cannot phone the number on the letter until Monday, its a Monday-Friday helpline...   The last thing  I want is them at my door for arrest, or even banning me from driving...
    • 3rd Try   STATEMENT OF  I Mr will say as follows:    INTRODUCTION  1: I am the defendant and state that the facts contained in this statement are true to the best of my knowledge.   2: There are several documents attached with this statement. (paginated)   3: The agreement was later assigned to the claimant on 29/09/2017 a notice of assignment, incorrectly dated (See Exhibit 1) was sent to the defendant. It is my understanding that the claimant is an Assignee, a buyer of defunct, disputed or bad debts, which are bought on mass portfolios at a much reduced cost to the amount claimed ...10p to 15p in the £1 and which the original creditors have already wrote off as a capital loss and claimed against taxable income. The claimant then issues on mass claims to circumvent and claim the full amount of debt to maximise profit.   4: As an assignee or creditor as defined in section 189 of the CCA this applies to this new requirement on assignment of rights. This means that when an assignee purchases debts (or otherwise acquires rights under a credit agreement) it also acquires certain obligations to the borrower including the duty to comply with CCA requirements (such as the rules on statements and notices and other post-contractual information). The assignee becomes the creditor under the agreement. This ensures that essential consumer protections under the CCA cannot be circumvented by assigning the debt to a third party.   BACKGROUND   5: The Claim relates to an Alleged Credit card agreement between the defendant and Vanquis bank.   6: Whilst it is accepted that the defendant has in the past had contractual dealings with Vanquis, the defendant is unaware of what alleged debt the claimant refers.   7: The defendant has requested on numerous times a copy of the CCA, the first time, claimant has replied back on 23/11/2020 (Exhibit 1) with a copy of the agreement and notice of assignment, the agreement being a printed out application form, followed by my another letter containing statements(not enclosed). Defendant then again requested on the 07/12/2020 (see letter attached Exhibit 2) a copy of the CCA, claimant has replied back on the 28th Jan 2021 claiming that the evidence enclosed rebuts defendants defence and encloses a statement and default notice. (Exhibit 3) 8: The defendant stated in his defence that no evidence of the CCA has been provided. 9. The alleged account is £less that £200 over the credit limit but the default notice states that the arrears on the account is £200. Under section  87/88 of the CCA the default notice should not include unlawful fees in it sum requested. 10. The defendant sent a Subject Access Request letter dated 30/11/2021, on writing this witness statement nothing has been received.   DEFENCE:   11: The claimant has not provided a true copy of the CCA despite numerous requests being made firstly in September and secondly on the 07/12/2020 in response to claim despite stating in the letter dated 23rd October 2020 `please find enclosed a copy of the agreement. Should the claimant magically supply some form of CCA at trial, defendant would highlight why this wasn't provided, when requested, on numerous times before trial. Defendant would then highly stress to the court that this is indeed not the true copy of the executed Credit agreement.   12: There is no valid copy of an executed consumer credit agreement that complies with the CCA1974   13: The `so called ` copy of agreement stated in claimants letter dated 23/11/2020 is in fact stated as an online application and is no more than a log from either the OC`s operating system or one that has been constructed since with details from the account to look like an application. 14. The notice of assignment dated 11th May 2017 (Exhibit 1) states that the debt was sold to Lowell Portfolio I Ltd on the 29th September 2017. This is confirmed in 2 separate letters. One from Vanquis and the other from Lowell Portfolio I Ltd. Section 82A of the CCA 1974 states that the assignee must arrange for notice of the assignment to given to debtor. The above letters show that the notice of assignment has incorrect dates, thus rendering the notice of assignment invalid and thus the claimant has not acquired the debt correctly and thus cannot claim.   IN CONCLUSION:   15: Without a valid true copy of the executed Credit agreement that complies with the CCA1974 the claimant has no grounds on which to enforce this alleged debt and has in fact attempted to mislead the courts in to believing that they have the necessary paperwork.   16: The incorrect dated Notice of Assignments letters questions the ability of the claimant to maintain correct paperwork and thus the defendant is unsure what paperwork supplied is correct.   17: It is therefore requested that the Claimants Claim is struck out pursuant to the above.   Signed  Dated this day…….      Could you check out this part   "14. The notice of assignment dated 11th May 2017 (Exhibit 1) states that the debt was sold to Lowell Portfolio I Ltd on the 29th September 2017. This is confirmed in 2 separate letters. One from Vanquis and the other from Lowell Portfolio I Ltd. Section 82A of the CCA 1974 states that the assignee must arrange for notice of the assignment to given to debtor. The above letters show that the notice of assignment has incorrect dates, thus rendering the notice of assignment invalid and thus the claimant has not acquired the debt correctly and thus cannot claim."
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

  • Recommended Topics

The Outlet


johnjordan
 Share

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2140 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yesterday as my wife was leaving The Outlet store in Coalville, Leicestershire along with a couple of other people the alarm went off.

 

 

As my wife had not purchased anything she had no reason to be concerned and carried on down the road

to her surprise a shop assistant came running after her and insisted she return to the store.

 

 

My wife quite rightly in my opinion refused whereupon the assistant demanded to look through her shopping bag

but again my wife refused although she did take out a couple of items she had bought elsewhere

and suggested they may have set the alarm off.

 

As the situation was now getting very upsetting my wife reluctantly returned to the store entrance

and three times walked through the alarm panels which obviously did not go off;

the assistant then said it must have been the wind that set them off.

 

I am returning to the shop myself today to ask for the address of their head office as my wife was hugely humiliated in front of other shoppers

but would appreciate some advice as to what other action she could take, if any.

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just how you expect someone to act who has nothing to hide

Why not cooperate

 

Mountain out of a mole hill

Move on more important things in life to worry about

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Strangely enough, I agree with both of the above statements. In the 'grand scheme of things' this is a minor matter which will have been forgotten about by the staff and other people in the area at the time.

 

On the other hand, why did the assistant not go after the others who left at the same time and just picked on your wife? Was she the only one with a bag? What attitude had the assistant got? Polite? High and mighty? Far too many variables to make a considered response.

 

The two chains of thought here are

a) She has done nothing wrong therefore what right do the staff have to stop her and demand to examine the contents of the bag.

b) She has done nothing wrong but for the sake of it, just show them.

 

I agree with emailing them if only to ensure that they make the staff aware of their responsibilities in dealing with issues like this.

 

As an aside, can you imagine someone has been to an 'adult' shop and bought a 'toy'. The embarrassment would be huge.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Strangely enough, I agree with both of the above statements. In the 'grand scheme of things' this is a minor matter which will have been forgotten about by the staff and other people in the area at the time.

 

On the other hand, why did the assistant not go after the others who left at the same time and just picked on your wife? Was she the only one with a bag? What attitude had the assistant got? Polite? High and mighty? Far too many variables to make a considered response.

 

The two chains of thought here are

a) She has done nothing wrong therefore what right do the staff have to stop her and demand to examine the contents of the bag.

b) She has done nothing wrong but for the sake of it, just show them.

 

I agree with emailing them if only to ensure that they make the staff aware of their responsibilities in dealing with issues like this.

 

As an aside, can you imagine someone has been to an 'adult' shop and bought a 'toy'. The embarrassment would be huge.

 

Why return to store? Avoid confrontation and getting angry. Just pen a letter or email to HO :)

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...