Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Howdy, I had a short lived credit card with Vanquis that I did not need. I paid it off in full and called them and closed it with the person at the other end. 2 months later they started sending me messages about late payments, I called them and to find out that the card had not been closed in error and 6 weeks after it should have been closed they paid a google debit of £560. I hit the roof and made a formal complaint that took them well over a month to respond to. They agreed they were at fault, refunded all late payments fees and offered me £100 in compensation. However they said the debit amount stood as 'I had benefit from it' and I should get a refund from google. I hit the roof again but they have stuck to their guns. The debit from google is a genuine one but I wanted to dispute it with google so closed the card so they would have to engage with me. But surely that's neither here nor there surely? What is the next step? Ombudsman takes forever doesn't it?  thanks in advance
    • Yes, it struck me this morning that I'd got it wrong    - no involvement of UKPPO in any previous Tesco thread    - there would have been an entrance sign to a Tesco car park    - CCTV isn't something associated with Tesco car parks. Presumably whoever runs the car park has put CCTV at the electric, and probably BB, areas, done absolutely nothing to stop abuse, and then rubs their hands in glee every time the CCTV catches a motorist out. You can pay £60 and this will go away. Or you can defy UKPPO and rely on their non-respect of POFA, consideration period, etc., should they be daft enough to do court later down the line.  We would support you all the way.
    • Good evening folks, i have my hearing tomorrow at 3pm. I have never been to court for a civil matter, what is likely to happen  and what do i need to do?  I plan on going straight from work, i finish at 2pm, it will take about half an hour to get there, does that sound ok? I called the court late this afternoon, sadly i was too late in the day and the office was closed.  
    • This is kind of related but does anyone know since I have this ban from entering UAE because of my loan, can I visit Qatar? 
    • Thank you for that i thought id just ask as i was unsure.  Just hope its returned to me and doesnt spend the rest of its life going back and forth to Singapore  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PRA/MBNA debt-CCA sent-received a reply. Help needed


laidy_ma
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2864 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I called MBNA to confirm card numbers and it seems that in this balance sheet attached in #30 they have mentioned two completely different credit cards- no idea how this has happened but there is something wrong...

 

the first two card numbers mentioned in the balance sheet belong to MBNA Platinum Plus Master Card

and the last 4-5 lines of the balance sheet shows a third card number finishing on 39.

This is MBNA Europe Master Card...Are not these completely different?

 

 

First I spoke to a woman and she was telling me that I use to have 2 different credit cards with them ,

second I spoke with a man who told me that both accounts have been passed to a collection agency

expert credite but then he said o ye this is the same account.

.. so not clear at all

...so I am sending the SAR tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

hello again,

 

Advice will be highly appreciated about the following.

 

As suggested I sent SAR to MBNA- I received the SAR back.

The bank transactions match what PRA sent me in their CCA.

Please see #30. I have also received the card agreement no signature (2006).

 

Including in the SAR about 20-30 pages of communication between the bank and myself

and effort on their side to FIND me by talking to my former employer

(where I was a nanny before getting ill and going to hospital with cancer diagnose):

 

 

most of the notes are some sort of codes which I don't understand at all,

some of the notes are mentioning dates when they have called me

and I have explained that I am very ill in hospital etc...(which was true)

and they asked me to sell something to pay my debts!!!

 

It states that I am a primary card holder but it seems that my ex partner was also a card holder?! which I have forgotten.

He also has done all the online application for most of my cards.

 

 

In the Operator/communication log sheets they have changed my e-mail address to my ex boyfriend e-mail address for some reason!,

I think it is quite clear I was not the only card holder on this account.

 

 

I have been reading the documents they sent me and still can't understand 99% of it.

 

I don't believe that I can upload all this information here? 20-30 pages?

Is there anyone who has the time to look in detail

and advise please if possible to upload the documentation here?

 

I received the SAR in the end of April.

PRA has been ringing once a day (automated service) asking to call back- I never responded.

No letters in the post from PRA except the one I received couple of days ago.

 

 

Please see the letter attached:

They are telling me that my account has been transferred to the Litigation Department and to contact them in 14 days.

I have not been paying them anything since January when I sent the CCA request.

Ignore the letter?

 

Thanks in advance.

litigation-department-lettter-pra-13-06-2016.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

redact all the pages

put ALL THE PAGES into ONE multipage WORD.DOC

one image to a page.

then

file

save as

.pdf

then upload

 

 

so it appears the mystery is solved

joint card holders

 

 

let it run for now

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX, I will upload the whole info into one pdf document

- will try to do that asap (by the end of the week).

 

 

Ex boyfriend name mentioned at least couple of times on their comments sheet

including his e-mail address but I guess he had another card number and the CCA is all about my card.

.. all look very confusing.

 

 

I will ignore the 'litigation' letter for now...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...