Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell/? Claim Form - old 3 Mobile 'debt'


enabled
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2994 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello there.

 

My partner received a letter this morning titled "Claim Form" in the top left corner.

 

It is regarding a debt from the mobile phone company Three.

 

The debt we think was roughly 2-4 year ago but we can not be sure.

 

We recognise this debt ourselves but at the time could not afford to pay it and buried our heads and ignored letters from them.(not proud of it)

 

We were out of our jobs and had 4 children so paying off the debt was a difficult job.

 

In hindsight we should of contacted them and told them about the situation but sadly we never.

 

The debt was never an huge amount, the letter states £326.69 initially then goes on to add some further charges.

 

Personally the letter just looks like a photocopied piece as the stamp from the county court doesn't look right.

However there is a claim no at the top so unsure

.

I can upload a image and remove the sensitive information if that is any use.

 

We are unsure about how to go about the debt in terms of repaying it, who to pay, do we challenge the debt or any other options?

 

Myself and my partner are potentially going to open a new business within the next few months

and imagine if we let this escalate it will cause damage to this?

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciate.

 

The letter was received yesterday.

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to Financial Legal Issues.

 

If you could read the following link and then copy and paste your responses here for further advice on how best to proceed.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-December-2014**(3-Viewing)-nbsp

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? Lowell Portfolio 1 LTD

 

Date of issue –. 01 January 2016

 

What is the claim for –

 

1.The claimants claim is for the sum of £326.69 being monies due from the defendant to the claimant under a non-regulated communications agreement

between the defendant and Hutchinson 3G UK Limited under account reference xxxxxxxxxx

and assigned to the claimant on 23/12/2014 notice of which has been given to the defendant.

 

2.The defendant failed to maintain the contractual payment under the terms of the agreement and a default notice has been served and not complied with.

 

3.The claim also includes statutory interest pursuant to section 69 of the county courts act 1984 at a rate of 8.00% per annum

(a daily rate of £0.07 from the date if the assignment of the agreement to 23/12/2015 being an amount of £25.62.

 

What is the value of the claim? £437.31

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? Mobile phone account

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? After 2007

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned

and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. lowells

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment?

We had received a few standard debt letters from Lowell regarding the debt but as stated kind of buried our heads regarding them.

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Three had originally sent out some letters

but with it being a while ago that it was with Three I am not sure when and how many

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? Quite possibly but can not guarantee.

 

Why did you cease payments? Back in 2014 we couldn't pay 3 the amounts anymore and it just tallied up.

 

What was the date of your last payment? Could not tell you sorry

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No we just ceased payments when we struggled to afford them.

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt managementicon plan?

As far as I was aware I called 3 up and made them aware of the situation regards struggling to pay.

They could not help me out in regards to that as we were still tied into the contract

 

Are these details enough? I can even upload a image of the form if needs be too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No thats fine enabled ...

 

Are you in a position to settle the debt now...possibly by way of monthly payments?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No thats fine enabled ...

 

Are you in a position to settle the debt now...possibly by way of monthly payments?

 

Andy

 

Possibly so yes. However I would need the repayments to be as low as possible if that was the case

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you have few options .......

 

Given the point you make in your initial post with regards to opening a new business within the next few months ...the last thing you want will be CCJ for for the sake of £400.

 

You can approach the claimants solicitor and suggest a Tomlin Order...this is a consent that stays the claim subject to you sticking to the agreed payments.....no CCJ.

 

Or you can defend the full claim...on the pretense that they will not proceed to full trial for the amount involved...and this will also allow extra time to consider your options.

 

You have 33 days in total to deal with this if defending in full...19 days to acknowledge service of claim (day 1 is the date on the claim form) and if defending in full a further 14 days to submit your defence...all this can be done on line using the MCOL gov web service.

 

If you partially admit or admit the claim you will get a CCJ automatically with no room to mediate or given chance to make a payment arrangement.

 

They are your options.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you have few options .......

 

Given the point you make in your initial post with regards to opening a new business within the next few months ...the last thing you want will be CCJ for for the sake of £400.

 

You can approach the claimants solicitor and suggest a Tomlin Order...this is a consent that stays the claim subject to you sticking to the agreed payments.....no CCJ.

 

Or you can defend the full claim...on the pretense that they will not proceed to full trial for the amount involved...and this will also allow extra time to consider your options.

 

You have 33 days in total to deal with this if defending in full...19 days to acknowledge service of claim (day 1 is the date on the claim form) and if defending in full a further 14 days to submit your defence...all this can be done on line using the MCOL gov web service.

 

If you partially admit or admit the claim you will get a CCJ automatically with no room to mediate or given chance to make a payment arrangement.

 

They are your options.

 

Andy

 

Hi Andy, I have a few questions to ask. Is it possible to question the amount in question as we can not be too sure how accurate it actually is?

 

When you say defend the full claim, what does that involve?

 

The Tomlin order, if I was to phone would it be mandatory for them to accept a payment plan or can they refuse this?

 

Finally the actual claim letter, is it a legitimate document or is it likely to be a copy using it as a scare tactic?

 

Thanks for all the help so far

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy, I have a few questions to ask. Is it possible to question the amount in question as we can not be too sure how accurate it actually is?

 

Yes and that becomes a reason for defending

 

When you say defend the full claim, what does that involve? When you receive a court claim you have 3 options through the court.....Admit...Partially admit or Defend in full...take a read of other threads on how the process unfolds

 

The Tomlin order, if I was to phone would it be mandatory for them to accept a payment plan or can they refuse this? They can refuse.... they can refuse a monthly and insist on full payment...negotiation is the key to getting a good Consent Order

 

Finally the actual claim letter, is it a legitimate document or is it likely to be a copy using it as a scare tactic? I would not think they would risk using a false one....they would face the wrath of the Court...ring Northampton and check the claim number if you have your suspicions

 

Thanks for all the help so far

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a read of the legal success forums. There are multiple threads similar to yours with defences that can be adapted.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I shall have a better look tomorrow but other than lack of documentation is there anything else, for my case?

 

I shall have a better look tomorrow but other than lack of documentation is there anything else, for my case?

 

Can I ask if I was to defend and failed/lost do I get a ccj?

 

Also today I received a letter from bwlegal, NOTICE OF COUNTY COURT CLAIM ISSUED.

 

It states in the what you need to know section that I can call them and sey uo a affordable repayment arrangement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you lose, youll get a ccj. However if you pay within 28 days after judement it wont be recorded. But if you lose, you can also pay at rate you can afford and is determined by the court, and theres nothing lowells can do.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK so if I lose we still get the option to pay in installments, court deciding how much? Just making sure I have that right.

 

After readibg a lot of the forums it does seem that a lot of people are successful when defending these claims but from our case it doesn't look like I have a lot of defence apart from hoping they don't have the evidence. Do you see any other potential ways to use for the defence, should we go with it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you have a good chance many do....

 

 

as andy says

you could always do a tomlin...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

" Can I ask if I was to defend and failed/lost do I get a ccj? "

 

Yes but you are going to get one anyway...even if you dont defend in full...so nothing lost.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

" Can I ask if I was to defend and failed/lost do I get a ccj? "

 

Yes but you are going to get one anyway...even if you dont defend in full...so nothing lost.

 

Andy

 

Or like you said taking the Tomlin order would avoid this.

 

I can't think of a defence so thinking it would be a better idea.

 

Would you persoanlly suggest defend or Tomlin order?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They wont consider a Tomlin Order unless you defend it...no need to as they will get automatic judgment

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

ALWAYS DEFEND ALL regardless..

 

then you could do a tomlin IF it looks required

 

there are more successfully defended won claims here

than those that crumbled and paid and got fleeced

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh so I have to initially defend it before requesting a Tomlin order?

 

It adds leverage...but you can still approach them with a payment plan if not defending...but be quick as you then only have 19 days from the date of the summons.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Apologies for the late response, had internet problems.

 

 

I have logged on tonight and clicked defend all

but have not started putting anything in the defence section as of yet as I am not 100% sure what I need to put in.

 

Do I need to check the Acknowledgement of Service section while I am there too?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

defend all click aos

leave juris unticked

 

 

exit mcol.

 

 

get the correct CPR 31:14 running tomorrow from the legal section of the library tab too!

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

defend all click aos

leave juris unticked

 

exit mcol.

 

 

get the correct CPR 31:14 running tomorrow from the legal section of the library tab too!

 

 

dx

 

It will be the one titled LEGAL : CPR 31.14 Request - Request for information when a Claim has been issued, is that correct?

 

Need to make sure I get it correct

Link to post
Share on other sites

It will be the one titled LEGAL : CPR 31.14 Request - Request for information when a Claim has been issued, is that correct?

 

Need to make sure I get it correct

 

Yes the other one is for current accounts/overdrafts

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...