Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The firm has benefited from the AI boom, making it the third-most valuable company in the US.View the full article
    • Former billionaire Hui Ka Yan has been fined and banned from the financial market for life.View the full article
    • In terms of "why didn't I make a claim" - well, that has to be understood in the context of the long-standing legal battle and all its permuations with the shark. In essence there was a repo and probable fire sale of the leasehold property - which would have led to me initiating the complaint/ claim v SPF in summer 19. But there was no quick sale. And battle commenced and it ain't done yet 5y later. A potential sale morphed into trying to do a debt deal and then into a full blown battle heading to trial - based on the shark deliberately racking up costs just so the ceo can keep the property for himself.  Along the way they have launched claims in 4 different counties -v- me - trying to get a backdoor B. (Haven't yet succeeded) Simultaneously I got dragged into a contentious forfeiture claim and then into a lease extension debacle - both of which lasted 3y. (I have an association with the freeholders and handled all that legal stuff too) I had some (friend paid for) legal support to begin with.  But mostly I have handled every thing alone.  The sheer weight of all the different cases has been pretty overwhelming. And tedious.  I'm battling an aggressive financial shark that has investors giving them 00s of millions. They've employed teams of expensive lawyers and barristers. And also got juniors doing the boring menial tasks. And, of course, in text book style they've delayed issues on purpose and then sent 000's of docs to read at the 11th hour. Which I not only boringly did read,  but also simultaneously filed for ease of reference later - which has come in very handy in speeding up collating legal bundles and being able to find evidence quickly.  It's also how I found out the damning stuff I could use -v- them.  Bottom line - I haven't really had a moment to breath for 5y. I've had to write a statement recently. And asked a clinic for advice. One of the volunteers asked how I got into this situation.  Which prompted me to say it all started when I got bad advice from a broker. Which kick-started me in to thinking I really should look into making some kind of formal complaint -v- the broker.  Which is where I am now.  Extenuating circumstances as to why I'm complaining so late.  But hopefully still in time ??  
    • At a key lecture in the City of London, the shadow chancellor will also vow to reform the Treasury.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/mortimer claimform - JD WILLIAMS T/A Marisota Cat Debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2997 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm posting on behalf of my son and his partner, and are in need of some assistance.

 

On the 14th December 2015 my son and his partner were served with separate MCOL claims,

one for Jacamo and

the other for Marisota.

 

 

I'm familiar these two accounts belong to the JD Williams group of companies.

 

A little background.

 

My son and his partner did have separate accounts for those mentioned above while they were living at home with me and my partner.

I know for a fact my son and his partner sent both Jacamo and Marisota a letter stating they had moved home.

 

 

However over many months both started to receive letters,

I was instructed by my son just to write the forwarding address on the envelope and to place it back in the letterbox.

Several months passed where every week I was sending mail back and then suddenly it stopped,

 

 

fast forward around 2-3 months later,

just shortly after the 14th December 2015 two MCOL claim packs arrived at my sons new address

one for my son and

the other for his partner.

 

The DCA responsible for this is CABOT and the solicitors Mortimer Clarke.

 

 

while it appears CABOT are happy to send correspondence to my son and partners previous address,

they then go on to issue the MCOL forms at their new address,

it seems to me CABOT knew what they were doing to cause confusion.

 

I have today with the assistance of my son and his partner completed the Acknowledgement of Service on the MCOL portal,

so we don't have to get a defence in right away

but at least we have a little more breathing space of around 14 days.

 

The particular problem for my son is I have been looking through his contract of employment

and should he get a CCJ his employer will dismiss him,

 

 

I'm not sure if they can dismiss him should his partner get a CCJ,

but for him and his family it would be devastating considering he is the single earner in the household

with a two year old child and another on the way.

 

My concern is how to approach this,

I know what CABOT have done is utterly despicable but for my son there has to be a way of dealing with this either by defending or by a Consent Order.

 

I know there will be the judgemental few out there who will try and say well they should have paid their accounts,

but when your youngest child has been seriously ill and you are losing 3-4 days a month from work for hospital appointments

then these matters have to take a back seat.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you confirm please....

they have two separate claimforms

one each for DIFFERENT DEBTS.

or

they have each received a claimform for the same debt?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok thank you

 

 

can you start a new thread

 

 

for the other claimform so's we keep them separate..

and fill in and copy and paste the Q&A for each one too.

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-December-2014**(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

 

thank you

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm posting on behalf of my son and his partner, and are in need of some assistance.

 

On the 14th December 2015 my son and his partner were served with separate MCOL claims,

one for Jacamo and

the other for Marisota.

 

 

I'm familiar these two accounts belong to the JD Williams group of companies.

 

A little background.

 

My son and his partner did have separate accounts for those mentioned above while they were living at home with me and my partner.

I know for a fact my son and his partner sent both Jacamo and Marisota a letter stating they had moved home.

 

 

However over many months both started to receive letters,

I was instructed by my son just to write the forwarding address on the envelope and to place it back in the letterbox.

Several months passed where every week I was sending mail back and then suddenly it stopped,

 

 

fast forward around 2-3 months later,

just shortly after the 14th December 2015 two MCOL claim packs arrived at my sons new address

one for my son and

the other for his partner.

 

The DCAicon responsible for this is CABOT and the solicitors Mortimer Clarke.

 

 

while it appears CABOT are happy to send correspondence to my son and partners previous address,

they then go on to issue the MCOL forms at their new address,

it seems to me CABOT knew what they were doing to cause confusion.

 

I have today with the assistance of my son and his partner completed the Acknowledgement of Service on the MCOL portal,

so we don't have to get a defence in right away

but at least we have a little more breathing space of around 14 days.

 

The particular problem for my son is I have been looking through his contract of employment

and should he get a CCJ his employer will dismiss him,

 

 

I'm not sure if they can dismiss him should his partner get a CCJ,

but for him and his family it would be devastating considering he is the single earner in the household

with a two year old child and another on the way.

 

My concern is how to approach this,

I know what CABOT have done is utterly despicable but for my son there has to be a way of dealing with this either by defending or by a Consent Order.

 

I know there will be the judgemental few out there who will try and say well they should have paid their accounts,

but when your youngest child has been seriously ill and you are losing 3-4 days a month from work for hospital appointments

then these matters have to take a back seat.

 

Although these threads may be the same they relate to separate claims.

 

The other thread is here..

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?457714-MCOL-claim-received.(33-Viewing)-nbsp

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant - CABOT

 

Date of issue – 14th December 2015

What is the claim for –

By an agreement between JD WILLIAMS T/A Jacamo & the Defendant dated 03/09/2012 ("the Agreement")

JD WILLIAMS T/A Jacamo agreed to is sue the Defendant with a credit account.

The Defendant failed to make the minimum payments Due & the agreement was terminated.

The agreement was assigned to the Claimant. The Claimant therefore claims £1530.

What is the value of the claim? £1715.

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? Cat

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? After

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt Purchaser (CABOT)

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not sure

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? No

 

Why did you cease payments? Son fell ill, time missed from work.

 

What was the date of your last payment? 2014?

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt managementicon plan? Original creditor knew of absence from work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? CABOT

 

Date of issue – 14th December 2015

 

What is the claim for – By an agreement between JD WILLIAMS T/A Marisota & the Defendant dated 29/06/2012 ("the Agreement") JD WILLIAMS T/A Marisota agreed to issue the Defendant with a credit account. The Defendant failed to make the minimum payments due & the Agreement was terminated. The Agreement was assigned to the Claimant. The Claimant therefore claims £1445.

 

What is the value of the claim? £1445, including costs £1595.

 

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? Cat

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? After

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt Purchaser (CABOT)

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not sure

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? No

 

Why did you cease payments? Son fell ill, time missed from work.

 

What was the date of your last payment? 2014?

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt managementicon plan? Yes, original creditor advised of time missed from work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you pop along to say noddle [below]

and findout the date the account was opened please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

pop off to say noddle and findout the takeout date if you can please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok who's blind......:lol:

 

def due Friday 15th by 4pm.

 

ok get a CCA request off to cabot

get a CPR 31:14 off to Mortimer [legal section of the library]

 

read the full CCA/CPR threads FIRST before sending each letter.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok who's blind......:lol:

def due Friday 15th by 4pm.

ok get a CCA request off to cabot

get a CPR 31:14 off to Mortimer [legal section of the library]

read the full CCA/CPR threads FIRST before sending each letter.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may be unaware that the response letter from Cabot will state they need 40 days to comply with the CCA request. This is wrong it is 12+2 days only. Keep this letter safe as you may be able to use it later...

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...