Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • did you submit your directions
    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Pyramidhair Vs. Natwest


pyramidhair
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6559 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Sent DPA disclosure request on the 9th March, received all bank statements for the last 6 years within a week.

 

I then (taking contact number from this site) called and spoke to John Cunnane, Customer Relations Manager, regarding the manual intervention issue, and told him I would need confirmation in writing that there was no manual intervention as i requested in my letter. He sounded as if he deals with this every day, he sounded exhausted and ready to just give up, bless him (heh heh heh), and said it would be with me very soon. I told him at that point what it was I was doing and that my second letter would be with him soon. Again he was courteous and very helpful.

 

Having trawled through six years of statements, I worked out the money owed to be £965. I sent my second letter, the Request for Payment of Charges on 13th April, taking the template from this site, and included photocopies of the statement pages that carried the charges concerned. I sent the letter directly to John Cunnane, and started it with a thankyou for his assistance on the phone, and further to our conversaion.. I am hoping to give him the impression I'll not be letting go until this is resolved.

 

Wish me luck as I wait for his response to my second letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't want luck, you want your MONEY!!!! :D

 

Ahhhh, I would feel sorry for them, I really would... Except that these are the same censor.gif who made my life a misery for so long when I needed them the most...

 

As far as I can tell, NWB will hold out as long as they possibly can... But like all the others, they'll give it back, one way or the other! (and by that, I do NOT mean with a stick of dynamite and a hankie over my face! lol)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bookworm you truly are an inspiration as my saga continues! Without reading your success story today I would give up right now, having received the following letter, Dated 20th April:

 

 

 

Dear Mr XXXXXX

 

Thank you for your letter of April 13th 2006, although I am sorry to learn that we have given you cause for concern. John Cunnane is not in the office until next week but I wanted to acknowledge receipt of your letter in his absence and outline our outlook on bank charges.

 

I have also noted the extent of your claim, net £965, but I haven't detacted any charges that were improperly taken because in every instance cleared covering funds weren't available by the close of business on the preceding working day. Overdrafts are not permitted on the Step account and this removes any flexibility that might be available to us when the amounts of items presented are relatively modest.

 

We believe that our charges are fair, reasonable and transparent. We consider that the amounts debited to your account have been applied strictly in accordance with your agreement with us and our published tariff, which we are satisfied complies with all laws and regulations. We are also committed to ensuring the transparency of the information that we give to our customers about the operation of our products.

 

Against that background, we must differ to the views expressed in your letter.

 

You have raised a question about "manual intervention" and I want to ensure that I am responding to your meaning of this phrase. Can I please ask you to let me know precisely what is meant and I will arrange for an immediate response to be sent to you. I enclose a prepaid envelope for you to use.

 

Thankyou again and apologies that I must ask for further information.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Stuart Higley

Customer Relations.

 

 

 

At this point guys I'm stuck and a little intimidated by how big this task now appears.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update, not sure what to do next right now, but will be checking it out this afternoon. Meanwhile, new letter, in response to my Letter Before Action (above).

 

There is little I can constructively add to my letter of April 20 except that I am sorry to learn that you are proceeding with your claim. The OFT statement of 5 April 2006 relates only to credit card charges and we have until 31 May to respond to them in this regard.

 

May I please remind you that any papers are serviced on our Registered Office address, which appears below.

 

Yours Sincerely.

 

Now. Am I out of options now, but to take it to court?

 

Any assistance from successful claimants would be greatly appreciated as I prepare. Cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am in the same position, just received a letter from Natwest in reply to my final letter of warning, they replied:

 

"I note what you say, in particular your next move. I am dissapointed that you propose to commence proceedings against the bank and hope, even at this late stage, that you feel able to reconsider."

 

I will be issuing a county court action as soon as i have the money to do so, probably next week.

 

Good luck with your action, keep us updated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am in the same position, just received a letter from Natwest in reply to my final letter of warning, they replied:

 

"I note what you say, in particular your next move. I am dissapointed that you propose to commence proceedings against the bank and hope, even at this late stage, that you feel able to reconsider."

 

I will be issuing a county court action as soon as i have the money to do so, probably next week.

 

Good luck with your action, keep us updated.

 

Good luck to you too mate and thanks.

 

Is that correct, the statement above? Or is he being sneaky with half truths or what? Am I barking up the wrong tree by claiming returned DD charges?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is true that the OFT have approached the Banks and Credit Card Companies relating to Credit Cards specifically, but if this can be seen as a penalty then Direct Debit charges most certainly are too.

I was a little unsure about the Direct Debit thing too, but the argument in law, as far as i can make out from reading threads here and other websites is that these charges are a profit making scheme, £38 a time i get charged for Unpaid Direct debits and this in no way reflects the loss the bank has for not paying this. It costs about 50p for them to send you an automated letter (if that) and so the argument is that if they are making huge profits from these charges (which is obvious) then they are in fact penalties and unlawful.

I think the idea is let the bank prove that it costs them £38 every time they cannot pay a direct debit. I would like to see how they could possibly justify it.

 

Take em to court!!

 

Best of luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having read Henry's thread on the front page I must say I am now extremely unnerved by the idea of going to court.

 

My case is based solely on instances where I have gone into an overdraft thanks to a DD being paid when it was not in the account (usually only by 2 days maximum and never once more than 20 pounds.) This would appear to be identical to Henry's case, which he lost.

 

If any moderator would be able to assist in this area at all I would be more than happy to go to court if I had enough information to feel more confident about doing so. I can't afford £2oo court costs I know that much, but from my previous workings out, they have over £900 of mine thanks to these charges.

 

What IS a mother to do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly good luck. You've a lot more to claim than me - I have only £45. You're about a week ahead of me, so I'm very interested in this thread and sincerely hope you keep us updated.

 

You seem to be going along all the right tracks as far as I'm aware, and I'm sure that if you have to raise your claim in court and win (even be it by default) that you get your costs returned.

 

Let's keep up the pressure on the banks. Hopefully policies will change for the future.

 

Good luck again. x

[

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again

 

I am "bumping" this thread instead of starting a new one (as advised) as the 14 days is now up and I'm about to start my claim through the courts.

 

PLEASE can I ask for a few thoughts from a moderator regarding my charges and claim. As stated above, they are almost entirely charges issued in instances where I have, with a DD, gone overdrawn, without having an overdraft. In EVERY instance this has been no more than £20 overdrawn, and immediately rectified every time as I have been paid into this account every month, almost £2k per month going in the account.

 

Natwest are arguing that these are NOT instances where the charges incurred are unfair or profiteering, as I went into an unauthorised overdraft. This one point is the only thing stopping me right now, from leaping in and getting my court action confidently underway.

 

I have a sneaking suspicion I'm being given "carefully selected" information (rather than "lies") to deter me, but I am very, very nervous at this time that I may have simply jumped onboard a bandwagon where all the successful people who have managed their way through this impossible organisation and come out successful, have had a more legitimate claim than I do.

 

Any help would be greatly, greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks

 

Ph

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not certain by any means but i think in Henry's case, the fact that he had a barrister with him may have forced the bank to send a barrister to challenge.

I'm not certain as i do not know if Natwest would have been aware that he was being represented by a barrister but it seems likely.

I realise your concerns because Natwest have actually fulfilled a service by paying the Direct Debits, which is very unusual as mine are always unpaid items. However, I still do not believe that the £38 charges would be accountable for if the DD's were for £20 or less.

Hopefully a moderator will put you straight as to what argument to use.

 

Good Luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do not be nervous, your chances of success, based on others (including mine) experience are very high indeed. All of the charges you mention are unlawful, regardless of the amount you were overdrawn. If you're unsure of the legal argument I STRONGLY recommend you read the FAQ pages carefully. Do not be intimidated by Natwest, they are in exactly the same position as all the other banks, and if you look in the 'Litigation concluded' dection you'll see plenty of instances where people have got their money back from them.

 

Please keep the forum posted on your progress.

 

Good luck!

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

True. try this

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5571

 

Also, there seem to be quite a few in progress.

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh yes, I'm well aware of that one! :) I've just filed my Moneyclaim at the weekend, so...

 

Anyway, I meant I couldn't see any re NatWest on the, "Litigation Concluded" thread (now I'm at this stage, I want to know what to expect!).

 

Anyway, sorry p'head - I'm not hijacking! :)

But then again, what do I know?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 2019-03-08.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6559 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...