Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tesco Loan Default - Advise on Options


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2866 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good Afternoon,

 

Firstly I appreciate everything you guys do on here,

I'm a first time poster and would appreciate any advise you can give me

- I'll give as much detail below in relation to my situation

however if you have any questions let me know;

 

So, at the moment I have a defaulted loan outstanding with Tesco Finance to the amount of - £ 8,900.

I defaulted from the loan in October 2013

and haven't been in contact with Tesco Finance since.

 

In January 2013 I moved to Australia to complete a two year working VISA,

at the time I had enough money in my UK account to cover my repayments

with the intention to transfer funds back to the UK when my UK money ran out.

 

 

I contacted Tesco Finance from Oz around February 2013 to update my address (when I got a fixed abode in Oz)

- however after that it went a bit pear shaped.

I ran into financial complications due to a health issue in Oz which I had to cover myself meaning I couldn't repay the loan,

 

 

I contacted Tesco to advise them of this in June 2013

- however after over 1.5hrs on the phone they wouldn't allow me access to my account

as the aforementioned gentleman who updated my address entered it incorrectly (house number and zip code).

 

 

They asked me to fax over proof of address which at the time was impossible,

and hence a stalemate ensued (wouldn't accept email, I tried).

 

I returned to the UK in December 2014,

financially I am now working full time,

renting privately and have a bad credit recovery credit card

however not in a position to repay currently due to other commitments.

 

 

Its been over two years since the default and I'm at a point now where I'm afraid to contact Tesco Finance in case it kicks things off again.

 

My question is;

is it naive to think Tesco Finance has just stopped pursuing (i.e should a DCA have been in touch by now?)

and will the fact that the account is still registered to my (incorrect) Oz address affect anything else on my credit account?

 

Also what would people say are my options? - Once again thanks for your help and time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you checked your credit file to see when the default date was set?

 

 

personally I wouldn't do anything until they start chasing you again.

 

 

..if you admit and try and set up a repayment plan you'll be paying this off for years.

 

 

...if eventually they start chasing you then you may be able to avoid a ccj by making a repayment agreement for a substantially reduced amount

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ford - I have a friend in Oz still living at the address, he has Facebook messaged me when any mail has came through and so far nothing at their end. On my Equinox file the default was set at Oct 2013. I was thinking that as well neil6534, however does anyone know the chances of them passing it too a DCA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ford - I have a friend in Oz still living at the address, he has Facebook messaged me when any mail has came through and so far nothing at their end. On my Equinox file the default was set at Oct 2013. I was thinking that as well neil6534, however does anyone know the chances of them passing it too a DCA?

 

ok, that discounts that then. :)

they'll prob start chasing it at some point, either them (via a dca) or sold on to a dca.

when did the loan term end?

Link to post
Share on other sites

not that i am suggesting that you contact them but if you want to get this sorted sooner rather than later

then you may be able to get a reduced settlement offer and repayment plan directly with them.

 

 

But....how much was the original loan for and how much in default and late payment fees have been added

because whatever course of action you decide it would be worth trying to get these removed

Link to post
Share on other sites

The original loan amount was for £ 14,440 and started 11/2011 and it was a 60 month loan so is due up in 11/2016.

 

 

Ahh well this is also an interesting point

the letter sent to me from Tesco Finance from memory is only a default notice

and gives no indication of late payment fees (don't have it to hand to double check though).

 

I presume the will be more inclined to pursue an outstanding debt after the minimum term (60months) are up?

Or is that incorrect?

 

 

- thanks for your advise neil6534, this is an option to consider.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd just like to say this is my opinion.

...there are others on here that know the law a lot lot better..

...but i do have experience dealing with personal debt so that is where my advice comes from...

 

 

.the thing you have to consider is how long you want this around your neck...

..do you try an sort it out now or wait until you either have a ccj or need to get it sorted before you get a ccj

- if you wait until this point then you'll have another 6 years of it appearing on your credit file after the debt has been satisfied

Link to post
Share on other sites

The original loan amount was for £ 14,440 and started 11/2011 and it was a 60 month loan so is due up in 11/2016. Ahh well this is also an interesting point the letter sent to me from Tesco Finance from memory is only a default notice and gives no indication of late payment fees (don't have it to hand to double check though).

 

I presume the will be more inclined to pursue an outstanding debt after the minimum term (60months) are up? Or is that incorrect? - .

 

 

correct.

did they ask for the full outstanding loan amount in the def notice, or just the arrears to its date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm trying to look it out

 

 

currently however from my memory it was the full outstanding amount that was asked for.

 

Thanks for the advise neil6534,

 

 

I definitely don't want it to get to CCJ situations,

 

 

before a CCJ is actioned do you get an option from the court to come to an agreement with the creditor/DCA?

 

 

Excuse my ignorance but this is quite new to me haha

 

 

- or does the CCJ just come through and thats the end of it

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would have thought that if a dca got hold of this they would pursue it eventually through the courts as its a healthy amount of dosh for them.

...saying that its also a healthy amount for tesco too

 

 

...so they may opt to pursue it themselves.

 

 

..at best if no one pursues you then it wouldn't be until december 2019 till it becomes statute barred

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advise neil6534, I definitely don't want it to get to CCJ situations, before a CCJ is actioned do you get an option from the court to come to an agreement with the creditor/DCA? Excuse my ignorance but this is quite new to me haha - or does the CCJ just come through and thats the end of it

 

not really

- once a court proceedings are started you then have to reply with a full list of in-comings and outgoings and a suggestion of what you can afford to repay

 

 

....more than likely a ccj will still be issued unless the dca or tesco do agree to an offer from you and withdraw their court proceedings.

 

 

..however if what you are saying is correct in that they havent sent you and correspondence until that point

then that will probably be frowned upon at court, however you've also failed to connect with them too so an even balance

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm trying to look it out currently however from my memory it was the full outstanding amount that was asked for.

 

if thats the case,

then they cld start chasing the full amount anytime.

and, statute bar wld (shld) start to run from around then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed it is a pretty decent amount of money for both,

 

 

I think I was just being naive thinking 'its been two years,

surely they would have done something by now'

 

 

- the debt is in Scotland, would that not mean its 2018? Or has it changed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed it is a pretty decent amount of money for both, I think I was just being naive thinking 'its been two years, surely they would have done something by now' - the debt is in Scotland, would that not mean its 2018? Or has it changed.
now that changes things a little...i believe the sb for scotland is 5 years
Link to post
Share on other sites

statute barred runs from the default date

 

 

no it does not

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and happy

 

Exceptionally happy.... however its a 50/50 I would have to grow rather large man parts in order to go through with. I think the best option to go for is to contact them and have a chat, maybe I can redeem club card points for money off? haha

 

I just still think its strange they haven't been at my door for that amount of money.... Guys really appreciate your help so far!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...