Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Christmas plans ruined by discrimination


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3023 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I have an Autism Spectrum Condition (Aspergers), I'm high functioning and perfectly fit physically. However, I have just been asked for a "fitness to travel" letter from my GP before Hurtigruten will accept my booking. They would not usually ask such a thing - I know, I have travelled with them twice before - but said it was due to the rigours of the journey!

 

I have no physical difficulties whatsoever and they only came up with this demand two days before I planned to travel. Now my Christmas plans are ruined.

 

Is this discrimination?

Any suggestions? Thank you, M

Edited by Missy Brindello
Link to post
Share on other sites

Discrimination? No. More like an over-zealous risk-assessment policy, and it does appear to be covered in the T&Cs. Depending on exactly when you made the booking though it does seem unreasonable for them to request this so close to departure.

 

The question I suppose has to be how and why they were aware of your condition. I note having just looked at the booking arrangements online that there appears to be no obvious area where conditions need to be disclosed - just the T&Cs - so how did they come to believe that they needed clarification of your fitness to travel?

 

The only obvious suggestion is to plead with your GP for his urgent attention in providing a fitness to travel letter and to get that faxed or scanned/emailed across tomorrow

 

I hope you manage to do so as I think without that you are unlikely to force them to change their position before the trip starts

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your contribution but given that I have traveled with them previously - and I've always had an autism spectrum condition - which is not a physical disability (as their t&c specify) - I don't see their need for this kind of information, this time. The reason they found out is that I normally drive and then use a pet friendly cabin but this time I was flying with a registered assistance dog.

 

Last time I went, there were loads of very old people, some with cancer, some who could barely walk. I just want to know if they were required to get letters too. I have never been asked for such a letter and I travel a lot. I missed my departure because there is no way I could get my GP to write a letter like that with 24 hours notice. I am young and fit and don't see why they insisted upon this letter on this occasion??

Link to post
Share on other sites

I fully appreciate 2 days not much time due to there maladministration but lets at least try and save your holiday first.

 

1. First thing contact Dr's Surgery and explain as you have hear what has happened and if they would be able to rush through a Fitness to Travel letter (bear in mind they may charge a cost for the letter)

 

2. Contact the company and explain when you got the their letter requesting fit to travel on xx/xx/xxxx with 2 days before travel you can obtain the letter but how do you get it to them on time? would they allow it to be emailed to them and to what email address or faxed to them and fax number.

 

Lets try to save it first.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately I have already missed my planned departure date Stu, and also the opportunity to make other plans.

 

Before I ask Hurtigruten why they are being so picky (on this occasion) I thought I'd try to find out if treating me so differently from other passengers constituted discrimination. The equality and human rights web page seems to suggest so - but I'm not an expert.

 

It's frustrating as in the letter they sent insisting on a fitness to travel letter they also explain that my pet will need a passport and to be up to date with her vaccinations in order to travel. I know she needs a passport (as do I!) I am not intellectually impaired either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that giving you such little notice is appalling however are you jumping to conclusions in thinking that these older people are being allowed to travel without a fitness to travel letter?

 

Just as you have a right to privacy i.e they have no right to know your personal details , they also have a right to privacy.

 

For many people , having cancer is just a chronic condition that in reality won't kill them or generally hamper their quality of life .

.

 

I don't mean to sound harsh , just putting across an alternative perspective. I suspect that when they see the words assistance dog they do wonder what the dog is there to assist with and someone somewhere will have decided that anyone with an assistance animal will need a fitness to travel certificate

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason I know is I have travelled with Hurtigruten before and neither me, my husband (who had cancer) or the elderly people we shared a table with had been asked for a note. I'm 55 and have never been asked for a fitness to travel letter by anyone - aspergers is difficulty with social communication rather than a physical thing.

 

Anyway, thank you all for your imput: it sounds like I will just have to let this go and not attempt to travel with hurtigruten again... I guess last night I was just upset that I would spend Christmas alone but the consensus seems to be against there being any discrimination.

 

Thanks all :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do think you have grounds for a complaint. I imagine it will hinge on when you told them you were taking a dog with you.

Personally I don't like their terms when the demand a woman up to 23 weeks pregnant to provide a fitness to travel letter.

Maybe as well, as aspergers is not a one size fits all diagnosis it affects people differently. When you Google aspergers and assistance dogs it points in the direction of people having rages. Poor quality information on tinternet I am afraid

Really sorry Christmas is spoiled.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

But Aspergers affects everyone differently. So from their point of view, they probably do need to know whether you are fit to travel. And there will be some people with cancer (depending on the type who are asked if they are fit to travel. The fact that you have an assistance dog, to them, is probably enough for them to ask whether you can travel.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Fletch. They knew all along that I had a dog as I'd reserved flights on the 29th Nov. They just kept changing their requirements so many times...

 

And yes, Aspergers affects people differently but is characterised by people who are intelligent (as opposed to"low functioning" types of autism) and, as I said previously, is not associated with ANY physical difficulties whatsoever. As I have travelled with them twice before they should know I'm up to sitting on a ferry.

 

Perhaps they thought my social difficulties might upset the other passengers ;-) I have been known to talk about my work too much. I'm a doctor (epidemiologist) and have lots of inappropriate body tales...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Now Christmas is over I have replied to their letter which effectively denied me transport. Even if it's not discrimination I did ask - first on 30th November - for a list of cabin numbers you could have dogs in (these are easier to book on other ferry sites) and several times since. They have not replied and I still don't have this list - there are only about 12 so it's not a hurculean task to send one out. If they had asked for a fitness to travel letter on the 30th November I would have been able to provide one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...