Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, Following the submission of my defense, last night I received an email from DCBL indicating that the claimant intends to proceed with the claim (I've attached a screenshot of the email for reference) along with the N180 directions questionnaire. I'm unsure how they obtained my email, but I suspect it was through the courts' form when I completed the Acknowledgment of Service. This email almost slipped my attention. I have also today received a letter from court to state they have received my defense.  It appears they are requesting an online telephone hearing with the court. Could you please advise me on the necessary steps I should take at this point? Thank you for your assistance. Letter-Email 25-04-24.pdf N180 - Directions questionnaire (Small Claims Track).pdf
    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
    • Sorry,  I'm not familiar with terminology.  Direction questionnaire is what I've seen online as next step. Witness statement: I haven't gone that far, that's why I put the question marks.
    • 2. Is correct disregard 1. You must attend ad per the order 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

army pension - no rights to a preserved pension pre 1975?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2900 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I qualified for my army pension in 1987 due to being unable to work through illness.

They refused to pay me.

I have not worked a day since and am even classed as disabled.

They owe me over £87,000.

I didn't fight for it due to mental problems.

Can I make them pay up now?

Thank you in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

podzak

do post up with further info. see if all can help.

i see from your other post you had some records, what happened there.

you're currently on benefits/disability, so that might help re the army claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you could perhaps provide some more details - have sent out S.O.S for you.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Could you please answer the following questions?

 

1. When did you join the Army?

2. When were you Discharged from the Army?

3. Were you Medically Discharged or Normal Discharge?

4. How many years did you serve?

5. Has your illness/disability been classed as due to your Service in the Forces?

6. Have you applied to get your pension early?

 

You need to be aware that we need to try and find out which of the Forces Pension Schemes you come under as there are different rules for each scheme.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

I joined the Royal Engineers, sept '63.

Demobbed 8/4/72 and again 8/4/75

I was discharged as time served both times.

Served 11 years 240 days.

My disability was due to a fully loaded artic smashing into the back of my car when I was stationary at a red light.

I applied early on the grounds that I was unable to work due to the injuries.

I have since claimed my pension which I qualified for on reaching 60.

However, I delayed claiming for 2 1/2 years as I believed they would cheat me out of that too.

 

I am registered as Disabled because of my injuries.

 

At the medical, the doctor took a dislike to me, not believing I had to rest for 30 mins on my way to York, from Northumberland.

I believe this was why he did not allow my claim.

 

 

I phoned Kentigarn House this year and was told "They must have had a reason to dissalow it so just get over it"!

Edited by Podzak
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Podzak

 

Could you Clarify the following:

 

You joined Sept 1963

Discharged 8th April 1972

 

Rejoined ???????????????

Discharged 8th April 1975

 

When did this Accident happen with the Artic?

Importantly to above were you On Duty at the time of the Incident?

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Podzak

 

Could you Clarify the following:

 

You joined Sept 1963

Discharged 8th April 1972

 

Rejoined ???????????????

Discharged 8th April 1975

 

When did this Accident happen with the Artic?

Importantly to above were you On Duty at the time of the Incident?

 

 

Found my little red books.

Joined 12/8/1963.

Demobbed ( time served) 8/4/1972.

Reserve 9/4/1972 to 3/9/1972

Re enlisted 4/9/1972.

Demobbed ( again, time served) 8/4/1975

 

 

Accident 8/5/1982 ( not in army at the time)

Stopped working 21/1/1987 ( pain killers not working)

 

 

The doctor

A. Took a dislike to me.

B. Said I wasn't unfit for work. ( even though I had given up a very well paid job that I loved doing)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Army pensions prior to 1975 (Except medical discharge) then you had to do the 22 years/18 years respective except officers, that is why many of us get nothing and we are in our 70s and were not National Service either, so if the service years do not add up then all we were told is hard luck BUT if we left after 1975 then we could claim proportion of service of not full -

 

Their thinking is to save money as more people in the forces prior to 1975 than after so pensions would cost government coffers.

 

Same with deafness from Guns etc prior to 1975 no claim can be made before that date, yet earplugs were only issue albeit too late for a lot of us in mid 60s, for most of us the damage unbeknown at the time has been done!

 

Unless you do a 2 -5 stint in government then no pension BUT they do even for that length of time.

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Podzak

 

Sadly due to your service dates their was no rights to a preserved pension pre 1975.

 

In the armed forces, prior to April 1975, there was a system of gratuities for people who left before retirement and who had not completed sufficient years’ service to qualify for a pension (22 years or 16 years in the case of officers). There was no system of preserved pensions or any right to transfer accrued rights to a different scheme. An MOD factsheet explains:

 

"Prior to 1975 there were no rights to preserved pensions in any public or private pension schemes. Most schemes had very restricted qualifying criteria for the award of pensions. For instance, to qualify for a pension under the Civil Service arrangements, an individual had to be over age 50 and have served for ten or more years. Those who left voluntarily before meeting these criteria lost rights to pensions. For the Armed Forces occupational pensions were awarded only if a member had completed at least 16 years reckonable service as an officer or 22 years reckonable service as an other rank. Reckonable service is paid service after age 21 for officers or after age 18 for other ranks."

(The above is taken from Page 4 of Armed Forces Pension Scheme and preserved pensions PDF at the link below)

 

Read More Here: http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN01151

(Please go to bottom of webpage and download the Armed Forces Pension Scheme and preserved pensions PDF and read the report fully especially page 4)

Edited by stu007

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

All very nice but...

"The Social Security Act 1973 brought about changes by requiring all pension schemes to preserve pension rights for those who left service after 6th April 1975 having completed at least five years qualifying service, and having attained the age of 26 "

I left on 8/4/1975, was 26 years and 364 days old and had served 11 years 240 days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I can fully see the angle you are getting at with that but the critical part of that is left service [b]"after 6th April 1975"[/b].

 

I think what you need is a full explanation as to why you are being denied this pension in writing.

 

What they may be doing is classing your service as broken service by this I mean 1963-1972 - 9yrs service, Reserve not counted as full time service, 1972-1975 -3yrs service and using your last period 1972-1975-3yrs service as the pension point I could be wrong.

 

I would question this and ask for full clarification please write to the following: (keep copies of all letters and get free Proof of Posting from the Post Office)

 

Veterans UK Pension Division

Mail Point 480

Kentigern House

65 Brown Street

Glasgow, G2 8EX

 

Please ensure you also include your full Service Number, Rank, Unit, Regiment, Service Dates (if possible scan your red book and print a copy and send that as well)

Edited by stu007

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Kentigern house is full of [removed]

I have already spoken to them and all they said was "If your pension was refused, they must have had a good reason. Just get on with your life"!

Edited by dx100uk
behave - dx
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Podzak

 

I know you say you spoke to them but do you actually have that response in writing?

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

All very nice but...

"The Social Security Act 1973 brought about changes by requiring all pension schemes to preserve pension rights for those who left service after 6th April 1975 having completed at least five years qualifying service, and having attained the age of 26 "

I left on 8/4/1975, was 26 years and 364 days old and had served 11 years 240 days.

 

 

 

 

& we got nothing from the 50/60s unless we had done 18 years or full pension after 22 years, they did that on purpose as prior to 1975 ! = small pay and no benefits.

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Podzak

 

I know you say you spoke to them but do you actually have that response in writing?

Nope.

when you're fobbed off a second time it's not what springs to mind m8.

I never thought i'd need that kind of proof.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Podzak

 

I can appreciate what your saying but don't get fobbed off by them (does the person you spoke to really know and understand all the forces rules and regs for the response you got?) put it in writing to them what your issue is and ask for full clarification. (remember to keep a copy and get free proof of posting from the post office)

 

If you have it in writing it should also refer to the different military regulations which can then be checked against your service.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Podzak

 

I can appreciate what your saying but don't get fobbed off by them (does the person you spoke to really know and understand all the forces rules and regs for the response you got?) put it in writing to them what your issue is and ask for full clarification. (remember to keep a copy and get free proof of posting from the post office)

 

If you have it in writing it should also refer to the different military regulations which can then be checked against your service.

 

Thank you.

I'll try to do that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Podzak

 

Let us know what they say when they get back to you.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi Podzak

 

Have they got back to you yet?

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...