Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks @lolerz. I've attached it to the post. What do you think? What's the organ grinder? NTK.pdf
    • I'm afraid that if the value of the item was under declared then that is probably the best that you can hope for. Also, because the item was incorrectly addressed – even by a single letter, if that because the issue relating to the delivery then that has probably compounded the problem. There is probably very little that can be done. If you are lucky you will get the item back and then you can start again and declare it properly. Undervaluing parcels which are sent by any means is always going to cause a problem if the item is lost or damaged. It may mean that the cost of delivery is slightly less – but at the end of the day the risk becomes yours. When you enter into any kind of contract, effectively you declare it a level of risk to your contracting partner – and they decide to enter into the contract with you based on that level of risk. You have declared a level of risk and £50 – and that's the deal.   Additionally, undervaluing an item which is an internationally has the effect also of evading customs and any VAT system which is in force in that country – and that makes the whole thing a little bit more serious
    • Perfect. Nice and brief and to the point. You don't bother to start telling your life story. Just the way it should be. Send it off. You have probably done enough reading to understand that it won't make any difference don't start drafting your particulars of claim. Open an account with the MoneyClaim County Court system and start preparing. Post your particulars of claim here before you click it off. You may have noticed that at some point you will be asked if you want to go to mediation on this. We used to advise it but now we recommend that you decline mediation and go to trial. Your chances of success are much better than 95%. Going to trial will incur an additional hearing fee but of course you will get that back. However if you go to mediation, they will simply try to penny pinch and to get you to compromise and also they will sign you up to a confidentiality agreement and probably threaten you if you breach it. Not only that, if the mediation fails because you stand your ground, it will add additional delay while they then give you a date to go to trial. The best thing to do is to decline mediation – prepare for court hearing. Pay the extra fee. The chances are that rather than get a judgement against them they will then offer you a full settlement rather than go to court. If they do offer you full settlement then you will be obliged to accept it – but that's what you want. If they don't offer you full settlement then you will go to trial and there will be a judgement against them. Just so that you understand, our first interest is that you get your money back – but a close second is that it does go to trial and there is a judgement which we will then be able to use to help other people. Anyway as you should realise, we will help you all the way.
    • I sent a parcel to Singapore but i spelt the address incorrecltly by 1 letter so the parcel couldnt be delivered and was returned back to the Uk but checking the tracking today the parcel had returned to the UK but is somehow on its way back to Singapore as the tracking says "Item leaving the UK"    Ive spoken ( tweeted) Royal Mail help who confirm that the parcel seems to be going back to Singapore and that if its not " Delivered" by the 29th of April theyll deem it as lost and will accept a claim but i cant remeber when booking what the compensation amount was but i dont think it covers the amount of the item.  As it was my fault that it wasnt delivered in the first place can i trey and claim the full amount back ? i think if i remember correctly it was £50 compensation but the item was £170 So the timeline is thus ...   22nd Of March .    Booked via P2G & dropped off a Post Office.  25th March arrives in Singapore and goes through customs ect ect 26th   Incorrect address and item is flagged as "return to sender" 28th Item leaves Overseas intenational processing centre 15th of April , Item is leaving the Uk (Again)   ?    
    • Post the NTK up here for the regulars to double-check. I highly doubt it's compliant with POFA though. Ignore the deforestation that comes unless it's ever a letter of claim. Any luck with the organ grinder?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Claimform from Hoist / Cohen for Santander Loan


djc1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2869 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks Andy I missed that,

Each party shall deliver to every other party and to the court office, copies of all documents on which they intend to rely upon no later than 14 days before the hearing along with a signed statement of truth.

I guess that the documents I intend to rely upon is a copy of the SB Defence and a signed statement of truth ? there is no mention of preparing a witness statement in the letter.

 

They may refer to it a statement of case or case summary.......but it must be there somewhere...a claim cant continue without parties submitting witness statements.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 115
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Just been through the letter again Andy,

And at the start of the letter it says District Judge Name has considered the statements of case and questionnaires filed and allocated the claim to the small claims track.

 

Then in the Notes it states, If you cannot, or choose not to, attend the hearing, you must write and tell the court at least 7 days before the date of the hearing. The district judge will hear the case in your absence, but will take account of your statement of case and any other documents you have filed.

Defo no information about having to file witness statements, or statements of case, so thank you for the info, bit sneaky of them I think

Link to post
Share on other sites

a 'statement of case' is the particulars of claim/defence. which has already been done.

you'll still need to do a wit statement, with any exhibits. ie what you 'will say' in court.

have a look at other threads for egs of type.

Link to post
Share on other sites

a 'statement of case' is the particulars of claim/defence. which has already been done.

you'll still need to do a wit statement, with any exhibits. ie what you 'will say' in court.

have a look at other threads for egs of type.

 

Quite ...should have stated case summary

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

djc

your post #71. there it is; a 'along with a signed statement of truth.' (ie wit statement) 14 days prior. consistent with cpr.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to inform the court by next monday 28th if settlement has been agreed or if an extention of the stay is required.

I have two questions, is there a template letter anywhere that i can use ? and as i have not heard anything from the mediation service or Cohen, should i say an extention of the stay is not required ?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi All, just a quick up date Its been over a month since i sent off the letter to inform the court that settlement has not been agreed and that I do not want an extention of the stay. I have not heard anything back from the court, so I guess no news is good news.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just working on my witness statement and looking for some pointers as how to do it.

 

Should I just list the particulars of the claim and state something along the lines of the debt is statute barred, and list the last date I made a payment

Link to post
Share on other sites

type in witness statement in the search cag box of the red toolbar.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just working on my witness statement and need some help on what to put in Paragraph 3

 

WITNESS STATEMENT OF xxxxx xxxxxxx

 

 

I make this Witness Statement in support of my defence in the claim and will state as follows;

 

On the xx of December 2015, I received a claims form from the County Court Business Centre, Northampton, for the amount of £xxxx.xx [EXHIBIT A].

 

The particulars of claim state:

 

1. That this claim is for the sum of £xxxx.xx in respect of monies owing pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA) under account no xxxxxx xxxxxxxx.

 

2. The debt was legally assigned by Santander UK PLC to the Claimant and notice has been served.

 

3. The Defendant has failed to make contractual payments under the terms of the agreement. A default notice has been served upon the Defendant pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA.

 

The Claimant claims

1. The sum of £xxxxx.xx

2 Interest pursuant to s69 of the county courticon Act 1984 at a rate of 8.00 percent from the xx/xx/15 to the date hereof 15 days is the sum of £34.12

3. Daily interest at the rate of £2 .27

4. Costs

 

1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

2. Paragraph 2 is noted I have in the past had a contractual relationship with Santander UK PLC. However the Defendant maintains that a Notice of Assignment was never received.

 

3. Paragraph 3 is denied as the Defendant (Any pointers or ideas I can put here)

 

4. Therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

© show and evidence any breach.

 

5.As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

6. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

Statement of Truth

 

I xxxxx xxxxxxx, the Defendant, believe the facts stated within this Witness Statement to be true.

 

 

Signed:

 

Dated:

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a copy of their particulars and a defence...not a witness statement ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a big help, thanks dx 100uk i will get started again on my witness statement, i have a few weeks to draft it and send it off before the deadline, and a little over a month before the court hearing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone go over my witness statement and give any advice please ?

 

IN THE COUNTY COURT Of xxxx xxxx

Claim No. xxxxxxxx

 

BETWEEN:

Hoist Portfolio Holding 2 Ltd Claimant

AND

xxxxx xxxxx Defendant

 

WITNESS STATEMENT OF xxxxx xxxxx

 

1. I xxxxx xxxxx the defendant in this claim appear before the court as a litigant in person make the following statement believing it to be true will state as follows:

 

2. It is admitted that I have in the past had financial dealings with Abbey.

 

3. On the xx June 2009 I made a payment of £xxx.xx by direct debit to my Abbey loan I refer to a copy of this as xxxx.

 

4. On the xx August 2009, I sent a formal request pursuant to s.77(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. Requesting a copy of the credit agreement relating to account No xxxxxx xxxxxx. This was sent by recorded delivery and was delivered to Abbey on xx August 2009. I refer to a copy of this letter and proof of delivery as xxxx.

 

5. I received a letter dated xx September 2009 from Abbey in response to my request It contained a bad photocopy of the loan agreement which in places are illegible and Terms and Conditions relating to February 2003 I refer to a copy of this letter as xxxx.

 

6. On the xx October 2009 I sent an ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE letter to Abbey because I had concerns as to the authenticity of the credit agreement I had received from them which in parts are illegible. This was sent by recorded delivery. I refer to this letter and proof of delivery as xxxx.

 

7. Around mid January 2010 I received a Default Notice from Santander dated xx January 2010. I refer to this notice as xxxx.

 

8. Around mid January 2010 I received a letter from Santander dated xx January 2010 to inform me of their intention to register default information with Credit Reference Agencies. I refer to this letter as xxxx

 

9. On the xx March 2010 I received a letter from Santander confirming termination of my personal loan agreement with santander UK PLC. I refer to this letter as xxxx

 

10. On the xx August 2015. I received a copy of your latest statement from Hoist Portfolio Holdings 2 Limited. I refer to this letter as xxxx

 

11. On the xx August 2015 I also received a copy of your Notice of Sums in Arrears from Hoist Portfolio Holdings 2 Limited. I refer to this letter as xxxx

 

12. On the xx December 2015. I received a Claim Form from the County Court Business Centre, The Claimant being Hoist Portfolio Holdings 2 Limited. I refer to this letter as xxxx

 

13. I will now refer to my defence in this case

 

14. It is my belief that any agreement I may or may not have had with Abbey latterly santander UK PLC is subject to Section 5 of The limitation act 1980.

 

15. To the best of my knowledge my last payment on this account was made on the xx June 2009.

 

16. In excess of six years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach occurred

 

17. It is my opinion that the claimants claim is fanciful and contains no proof, they are totally unaware of the details of the debt they have purchased, and they are expecting judgment/relief be granted relying on the court to base its decision on assumption and basis of probabilities.

 

I believe that the facts stated in this Witness Statement are true.

 

Signed: xxxxx xxxxx

 

Date:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a copy of Hoists witness statement from Cohen solicitors,

Looks like they are saying it is not SB because the cause of action is the loan termination date

which was 30 Jan 2010 and not the last payment date,

 

 

To highlight this point they refer to the court decision made in the case of BMW Financial Services (GB) Limited-V-Hart Case No B2/2012/0849: where it was found that the limitation runs from the point of termination.

 

They have also included a reconstituted copy of the default notice which has several mistakes in it ,

I guess it would not be a good idea to highlight those mistakes here.

 

 

Any advice as to what i should do now would be very welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Statute of limitation runs from the breach not the termination date. If a contract which is governed by English law makes no mention of limitation periods, then the statutory periods provided for by the Limitation Act will apply - usually, six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued for simple contracts, or twelve years if the contract was executed as a deed - to bring an action for breach of contract or tort.

 

Limitation periods are considered as a defence, rather than as a statutory requirement. The court will not take the initiative of time-barring a claim. It is up to the defendant to plead that the time limit has passed as a defence to an action that has been brought after the relevant limitation period has passed.

 

Unless otherwise stipulated in the agreement,(As it was in the case of BMW Financial Services (GB) Limited-V-Hart Case No B2/2012/0849) these time periods begin either on the date on which the breach of contract occurred, or the date the negligent act or omission occurred. This is known as the date of accrual. The limitation period does not run from the date of the contract itself. It is common to refer to actions which fall outside of these statutory time limits as being 'time barred'

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

djc

as andy points, bmw is case specific. which can be distinguished if the facts are different.

what do/did the terms of your agreement say on the matter

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy, very informative info,

Ford, I have been through all my docs, and the ones they have in their witness statement and there is no mention of limitation periods, so i guess as Andy mentions, If a contract which is governed by English law makes no mention of limitation periods, then the statutory periods provided for by the Limitation Act will apply - usually, six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued for simple contracts,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ford,

On my original copy of the agreement there are no sections regarding Termination, Ending The Agreement, or Payments.

In the Terms And Conditions the various sections are headed,

Your Payments,

Application of Payments,

Default,

Bankruptcy etc,

Disclosure of Information,

Settlements of Existing Accounts,

Optional Payment Protection Insurance,

Your Instalments,

Early Settlement,

Personal Agreement,

Extentions of Time etc,

Transfer by Us,

Definitions,

I will go through all again and look for what you mentioned, I will also post up what it says under Your Payments, and Application of Payments,

Link to post
Share on other sites

also, have a look for the term breached as stated in the default notice. if i recall, you said there was a default notice?

 

and what specific terms the claimant refers to in support in their wit statement

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...