Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
    • In anticipation of lodging my court claim next Weds 1 May (14 days after advising P2G that was my deadline for them to settle my claim) I have completed my first draft POC as below: Claim Claim number: xxxxx Reference: P2G MAY 2024   Claimant xxxxx   Defendant Parcel2Go 1A Parklands Lostock Bolton BL6 4SD  Particulars of Claim The defendant has failed to arrange for the safe delivery of the claimant's parcel containing a 8 secondhand golf clubs (valued at £265) that was sent to a UK address using their delivery service (P2G Reference xxxxx). The defendant contracted Evri to deliver the parcel (Evri Reference xxxxx) and refuses to reimburse the claimant on the grounds that the claimant did not purchase their secondary insurance contract. The defendant seeks to exclude their liability in breach of section 57 Consumer Rights Act. The secondary insurance contract is in breach of section 72. The claimant seeks reimbursement of £265, plus P2G fees of £9.10, plus postage costs for two first class letters to P2G of £2.70, plus court fees, plus interest. The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from xxxxx to xxxxxx on £276.80 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £xxxx   Details of claim Amount claimed £276.80 I look forward to your thoughts and comments guys! As ever, many thanks - G59    
    • Hmm, that's strange how they got my email then.  I assume the below is ok to send to DCBL, Nicky?  Hello, I am writing regarding our ongoing dispute and the upcoming court claim reference xxxxxxxx. To ensure fairness and transparency in our communications leading up to the court hearing, I request that you use postal mail exclusively for all further correspondence related to this claim. Please refrain from sending any communication or documents via email. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. If you have any questions or need clarification, please feel free to contact me via postal mail at the address provided above. Yours sincerely, xxxx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3045 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If you pay within 28 days you can get the judgement removed from your credit file of course.

I can find no legislation which says a creditor cannot transfer up a judgement even if there is a stipulated pay by date. Perhaps the transferring up is not regarded as part of the enforcment process, until the writ is issued.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I would be grateful if you could source me the relevant CPR/Legislation on that point HCEO.

 

CPR 40.7 (1) A judgment or order takes effect from the day when it is given or made, or such later date as the court may specify.

 

Therefore if the order states 'forthwith' then this means it is payable immediately. However, this would again apply to defended claims as it will be a Judge that states the 'forthwith' in the order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you pay within 28 days you can get the judgement removed from your credit file of course.

I can find no legislation which says a creditor cannot transfer up a judgement even if there is a stipulated pay by date. Perhaps the transferring up is not regarded as part of the enforcment process, until the writ is issued.

 

A judgment cannot be transferred up unless the sums are due and payable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As already stated most judgments are payable immediately (forthwith).

 

The £111.75 is the execution costs which are £60 court fee for the Writ and £51.75 fee for the instructing solicitor. Some new and inexperienced HCEOs do not understand the £51.75 is only applicable by a solicitor and have been offering it to all creditors in an attempt to have a commercial advantage. If charged correctly, this fee will all be owed.

 

If you paid after the Notice of Enforcement was issued you will also owe the Compliance Stage fee.

 

If you paid after the first visit then you will owe the Enforcement Stage 1 fee and dependant upon what else has happened in the case you may also owe Enforcement Stage 2 fee.

 

Who are the HCEO company?

 

I paid the CCJ a amount only during compliance stage.

Due to the outstanding £111.75 the creditor told the HCE company to continue action to recover (something I was not aware about).

 

 

I have no objection with paying £90 to HCEO company and have already paid the creditor an additional £150 to cover the £111.75 and any interest they wanted to charge.

 

What concerns me mostly is that the HCE company is asking for another £822 for stage 1 and 2

as they visited after I thought this matter was closed.

 

 

For the record I am not saying the HCE company has not fulfilled their obligations and I fully accept they sent me the appropriate paperwork at the appropriate time.

 

The HCE company is High court enforcement group limited

 

@Andy no problem, I completely see how it is relevant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy,

you need to show where this 28 days grace period has come from.

 

 

I have just looked at 3 money orders and none stipulate anything about twenty eight days.

 

You must pay xxxxxx forthwith is on there.

 

If you don't comply then your goods may be taken and sold is on there.

 

If you pay in full in one month you can ask the cancel the entry on the register.

 

That is it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy,

you need to show where this 28 days grace period has come from.

 

 

I have just looked at 3 money orders and none stipulate anything about twenty eight days.

 

You must pay xxxxxx forthwith is on there.

 

If you don't comply then your goods may be taken and sold is on there.

 

If you pay in full in one month you can ask the cancel the entry on the register.

 

That is it.

 

A lot of the judgments vary in the Financial Legal Issues forums...some state a date by which as stated can vary between 16 and 28 days...some state forthwith with no date..this can be on default judgments and defended judgments.

 

Enforcement of a judgment is not automatic.

 

A judgment debt has to be paid within a month of the date of judgment unless the court has made a specific Order that it should be paid by instalments.

 

Enforcement is used where the judgment debtor has failed to pay the judgment debt or failed to pay any instalment due under it.

 

The judgment creditor chooses which method or methods are most appropriate to their particular circumstances.

 

Enforcement applies equally to Judgments and those Court Orders that are able to be enforced.

 

https://www.moneyclaimsuk.co.uk/post-judgment-enforcement.aspx

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot of the judgments vary in the Financial Legal Issues forums...some state a date by which as stated can vary between 16 and 28 days...some state forthwith with no date..this can be on default judgments and defended judgments.

 

Enforcement of a judgment is not automatic.

 

A judgment debt has to be paid within a month of the date of judgment unless the court has made a specific Order that it should be paid by instalments.

 

Enforcement is used where the judgment debtor has failed to pay the judgment debt or failed to pay any instalment due under it.

 

The judgment creditor chooses which method or methods are most appropriate to their particular circumstances.

 

Enforcement applies equally to Judgments and those Court Orders that are able to be enforced.

 

https://www.moneyclaimsuk.co.uk/post-judgment-enforcement.aspx

 

I really wouldn't rely on that site for your info. It was only a week ago that it was full of all sorts of errors regarding HCEOs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

are the fees appropriate for the outstanding balance of £111.75 or are they entitled to work on the original balance of £3,070.46 despite the majority being paid?.

 

The fees should be charged on the 'sums to be recovered'. If at that stage it was only the £111.75 then the fees would not incur the percentage element which is 7.5% of the debt above £1000.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for clearing that up.

 

Can I ask why you did not pay at the Compliance Stage before they visited?

 

Of course. I didn't receive it,

as I said I am sure they sent it so I can't hold them responsible for that.

 

 

Prior to their visit they were made aware by the creditor I had paid the CCJ amount

and the creditor instructed them to carry on with the collection.

 

 

For me I paid the amount I

believed due at the time, could/should the creditor have acted more reasonably and halted proceedings with the HCE

at that stage with the £111.75 owing?

 

 

Is there not a duty of reasonable behaviour on the part of the creditor in this case even if the law says (and it is not clear to me still if it does)

 

 

I still owe the money under the high court writ?

 

 

Further once I was made aware of the additionally money the creditor wanted

 

 

I paid that directly to them (primarily as the HCE company bill has now ballooned to over £900)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fees should be charged on the 'sums to be recovered'. If at that stage it was only the £111.75 then the fees would not incur the percentage element which is 7.5% of the debt above £1000.

 

Thanks for that (and your other replies). If they have additionally charged me interest on the visit paperwork that is based on the original debt amount rather than the amount remaining would that invalidate their paperwork by any stroke of good fortune?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

But that is just the point of concern and discussion here HCEOs ...even forthwith judgments are allowed a grace of 28 days and are not submitted to the Trust Registry until after that period.....so why are they being allowed to transfer it up to HC and execute the judgment prematurely ?

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

 

Think you may find that Registry Trust enter the details as soon as they are notified by the list the Courts provide which may of course be only 24/48 hours after Judgment is made. Giveaway is when some of the "chasers" make contact to say they can help provide the means to pay enabling payment within the 1 month limit when it can then be removed.

Removing judgments: paying within a month

 

If you pay your county court judgment in full within one month of the judgment date, it will be removed from the register. - taken from Registry Trust Online

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The issue I am concerned with, is that the writ appears to have been issued to recover only a dispersement/fee, as the judgement debt had already been paid.

 

This is not allowable under the TCE, as the recovery was not under an enforcment power.

It is the writ which enables section 62 of the act and this could not be issued in any case other than on a judgement(which was setted), not fees due after the judgement and before the enforcement commenced.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

The issue I am concerned with, is that the writ appears to have been issued to recover only a dispersement/fee, as the judgement debt had already been paid.

 

This is not allowable under the TCE, as the recovery was not under an enforcment power.

It is the writ which enables section 62 of the act and this could not be issued in any case other than on a judgement(which was setted), not fees due after the judgement and before the enforcement commenced.

 

They applied for the writ prior to the judgement being paid, writ was issued on 25-Nov I paid judgement debt on 2-Dec

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah OK. unfortunate.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you would be wise to send an SAR (subject access request) to HCE. This will enable you to follow the actions the creditor took both prior and subsequent to the CCJ and writ.. Once you have the full picture it may offer a possibility to seek set aside of the writ.

 

I also had a creditor who was a bit to quick off the mark in instructing Shergroup to enforce a writ almost immediately after judgment. The Judge took a very dim view of their actions and not only was the judgment set aside the creditor ended up with a writ being issued against them for costs both County Court and a RCJ Master had awarded to me!!!.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really wouldn't rely on that site for your info. It was only a week ago that it was full of all sorts of errors regarding HCEOs.

 

I dont rely on any forums for any of my information...it was purely an example generally available on numerous webs in response to GrumpyToSayTheLeast post of asking where it states the grace period and an example of time allowed to pay.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you would be wise to send an SAR (subject access request) to HCE. This will enable you to follow the actions the creditor took both prior and subsequent to the CCJ and writ.. Once you have the full picture it may offer a possibility to seek set aside of the writ.

 

I also had a creditor who was a bit to quick off the mark in instructing Shergroup to enforce a writ almost immediately after judgment. The Judge took a very dim view of their actions and not only was the judgment set aside the creditor ended up with a writ being issued against them for costs both County Court and a RCJ Master had awarded to me!!!.

 

I think that tis is a very good idea.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

" Quote Originally Posted by HCEOs View Post

Hi Andy, Forthwith judgments are just that. There is no 28 days grace at present."

I would be grateful if you could source me the relevant CPR/Legislation on that point HCEO.

 

Apologies Confus3me for this Hijack on your thread but this point is very relevant to your thread

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

CPR 40.7 (1) A judgment or order takes effect from the day when it is given or made, or such later date as the court may specify.

 

Therefore if the order states 'forthwith' then this means it is payable immediately. However, this would again apply to defended claims as it will be a Judge that states the 'forthwith' in the order.

 

CPR 40.7(1) is with regards to when a judgment takes effect from ..not with regards to payment...

 

But how about......

 

Time for complying with a judgment or order

 

CPR 40.11 A party must comply with a judgment or order for the payment of an amount of money (including costs) within 14 days of the date of the judgment or order, unless –

 

(a) the judgment or order specifies a different date for compliance (including specifying payment by instalments);

(b) any of these Rules specifies a different date for compliance; or

© the court has stayed the proceedings or judgment.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Andy and given this, how does this sit with the earlier statement that judgements cannot be taken up oto he high court until they are due and payable.

Does this then mean that as a general rule they cannot be transfered witnhin 14 days of judgement ?

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well thats what the CPR states DB...we are just seeking clarity......if you have 14 days grace then in practice the judgment should not be executed...Its not the HCEO,s fault here they are being instructed by the Judgment Claimant...prematurely in my opinion.

 

Its not something that I normally get involved in ..as execution of this nature are quite rare in Consumer Regulated Agreement Judgments...I have seen and dealt with 100s of judgments which normally progress to AoE or Charging Order type execution.

 

I may split this thread to the Discussion forum shortly as its unfair on the original poster to hijack his thread in this way.....but this does require further discussion.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Andy as am I. It is why I asked the question.

 

As far as enforcment is concerned it is an important point.

If the enforcment is transferred up before they are entitled to do so the enforcment itself may be void, but it needs , as you say clarification.I have looked at a number of HCEO sites and they all say that the debt can be transferred up as soon as the creditor obtained a judgement. The application for the writ, is a different action then the application to the court to transfer up, hence my other question.(although it can be combined)

 

The county court act says this

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/28/section/85

 

85 Execution of judgments or orders for payment of money.

 

(1)[F1Subject to article 8 of the High Court and County Courts Jurisdiction Order 1991,]any sum of money payable under a judgment or order of a county court may be recovered, in case of default or failure of payment, forthwith or at the time or times and in the manner thereby directed, by execution against the goods of the party against whom the judgement or order was obtained.

 

There seems to be alternative views , and to be honest I have not had enough time to reconcile them , perhaps a discussion thread would be the thing.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will split the thread shortly

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will split the thread shortly

 

 

Could I very respectfully ask you don't split please? Unless I'm mistaken I think this could be potentially very relevant to my situation. Fully understand if you'd prefer to split though

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could I very respectfully ask you don't split please? Unless I'm mistaken I think this could be potentially very relevant to my situation. Fully understand if you'd prefer to split though

 

Your wish is my command....as long as you are content with the advise offered so far and happy for the thread to continue in its current form.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...